Nanoparticle-Stabilized Carbon Dioxide Foam Used In Enhanced Oil Recovery: Effect of Different Ions and Temperatures
- Jingshan San (Solvay) | Sai Wang (University of North Dakota) | Jianjia Yu (New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology) | Ning Liu (University of Louisiana at Lafayette) | Robert Lee (New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- October 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,416 - 1,423
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Foam mobility, Foam stability, Nanoparticle, CO2 foam
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 443 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
This paper reports the study of the effect of different ions (monovalent, bivalent, and multiple ions) on nanosilica-stabilized carbon dioxide (CO2) foam generation. CO2 foam was generated by coinjecting CO2/5,000 ppm nanosilica dispersion (dispersed in different concentrations of brine) into a sandstone core under 1,500 psi and at different temperatures. A sapphire observation cell was used to determine the foam texture and foam stability. Pressure drop across the core was measured to estimate the foam mobility. The results indicated that more CO2 foam was generated as the sodium chloride (NaCl) concentration increased from 1.0 to 10%. In addition, the foam bubble became smaller and foam stability improved with the increase in NaCl concentration. The CO2-foam mobility decreased from 13.1 to 2.6 md/cp when the NaCl concentration increased from 1 to 10%. For the bivalent ions, the generated CO2-foam mobility decreased from 19.7 to 4.8 md/cp when CaCl2 concentration increased from 0.1 to 1.0%. Synthetic produced water with total dissolved solids (TDS) of 18,583 ppm was prepared to investigate the effect of multiple ions on foam generation. The results showed that stable CO2 foam was generated as the synthetic produced water and nanosilica dispersion/CO2 flowed through a porous medium. The lifetime of the foam was observed to be more than 2 days as the foam stood at room temperature. Mobility of the foam was calculated as 5.2 md/cp.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||8|
Adkins, S., Gohil, D., Dickson, J. L. et al. 2007. Water-in-Carbon Dioxide Emulsions Stabilized with Hydrophobic Silica Particles. PCCP Phys. Chem. Ch. Ph. 9 (48): 6333–6343. https://doi.org/10.1039/B711195A.
Aroonsri, A., Worthen, A. J., Hariz, T. et al. 2013. Conditions for Generating Nanoparticle-Stabilized CO2 Foams in Fracture and Matrix Flow. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166319-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166319-MS.
Binks, B. P. 2002. Particles as Surfactants–Similarities and Differences. Curr. Opin. Colloid In. 7 (1–2): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(02)00008-0.
Binks, B. P. and Horozov, T. S. 2005. Aqueous Foams Stabilized Solely by Silica Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (24): 3722–3725. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200462470.
Binks, B. P., Duncumb, B., and Murakami, R. 2007. Effect of pH and Salt Concentration on the Phase Inversion of Particle-Stabilized Foams. Langmuir 23 (18): 9143–9146. https://doi.org/10.1021/la701393w.
Bond, D. and Holbrook, O. C. 1958. Gas Drive Oil Recovery Process. US Patent No. 2,866,507.
Cervantes Martinez, A., Rio, R., Delon, G. et al. 2008. On the Origin of the Remarkable Stability of Aqueous Foams Stabilised by Nanoparticles: Link with Microscopic Surface Properties. Soft Matter 4 (7): 1531–1535. https://doi.org/10.1039/B804177F.
Chang, S.-H. and Grigg, R. B. 1999. Effects of Foam Quality and Flow Rate on CO2-Foam Behavior at Reservoir Temperature and Pressure. SPE Res Eval & Eng 2 (3): 248–254. SPE-56856-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/56856-PA.
Churaev, N.V. and Derjaguin, B. V. 1985. Inclusion of Structural Forces in the Theory of Stability of Colloids and Films. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 103 (2): 542–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(85)90129-8.
Dickson, J. L., Binks, B. P., and Johnston, K. P. 2004. Stabilization of Carbon Dioxide-in-Water Emulsions with Silica Nanoparticles. Langmuir 20 (19): 7976–7983. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0488102.
Emrani, A. S. and Nasr-El-Din, H. A. 2015. Stabilizing CO2-Foam using Nanoparticles. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition, Budapest, Hungary, 3–5 June. SPE-174254-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174254-MS.
Espinoza, D. A., Caldelas, F. M., Johnston, K. P. et al. 2010. Nanoparticle-Stabilized Supercritical CO2 Foams for Potential Mobility Control Applications. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 24–28 April. SPE-129925-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/129925-MS.
Farajzadeh, R., Krastev, R., and Zitha, P. L. J. 2009. Gas Permeability of Foam Films Stabilized by an a-Olefin Sulfonate Surfactant. Langmuir 25 (5): 2881–2886. https://doi.org/10.1021/la803599z.
Fried, A. N. 1961. Foam Drive Process for Increasing the Recovery of Oil. Report RI-5866, US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC.
Johnston, K. P. and da Rocha, S. R. P. 2009. Colloids in Supercritical Fluids Over the Last 20 Years and Future Directions. J. Supercrit. Fluid. 47 (3): 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2008.10.024.
Kapetas, L., Vincent Bonnieu, S., Danelis, S. et al. 2016. Effect of Temperature on Foam Flow in Porous Media. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 36 (25 April): 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.02.001.
Kostakis, T., Ettelaie, R., and Murray, B. S. 2006. Effect of High Salt Concentrations on the Stabilization of Bubbles by Silica Particles. Langmuir 22 (3): 1273–1280. https://doi.org/10.1021/la052193f.
Lee, H. and Heller, J. 1988. Carbon Dioxide—Foam Mobility Measurements at High Pressure. In Surfactant-Based Mobility Control, ed. D. H. Smith, Vol. 373, Chap. 19, 375–386. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Mo, D., Yu, J., Liu, N. et al. 2012. Study of the Effect of Different Factors on Nanoparticle-Stablized CO2 Foam for Mobility Control. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-159282-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/159282-MS.
Saint-Jalmes, A. 2006. Physical Chemistry in Foam Drainage and Coarsening. Soft Matter 2 (10): 836–849. https://doi.org/10.1039/B606780H.
Sharma, M. K., Shah, D. O., and Brigham, W. E. 1985. The Influence of Temperature on Surface and Microscopic Properties of Surfactant Solutions in Relation to Fluid Displacement Efficiency in Porous Media. AIChE J. 31 (2): 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690310208.
Singh, R. and Mohanty, K. K. 2014. Foams Stabilized by In-Situ Surface-Activated Nanoparticles in Bulk and Porous Media. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 27–29 October. SPE-170942-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170942-MS.
Wellington, S. L. and Vinegar, H. J. 1988. Surfactant-Induced Mobility Control for Carbon Dioxide Studied with Computerized Tomography. In Surfactant-Based Mobility Control, ed. D. H. Smith, Vol. 373, Chap. 17, 344–358. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Worthen, A., Bagaria, H., Chen, Y. et al. 2012. Nanoparticle Stabilized Carbon Dioxide in Water Foams for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 14–18 April. SPE-154285-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/154285-MS.
Worthen, A., Taghavy, A., Aroonsri, A. et al. 2015. Multi-Scale Evaluation of Nanoparticle-Stabilized CO2-in-Water Foams: From the Benchtop to the Field. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 28–30 September. SPE-175065-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175065-MS.
Worthen, A. J., Bryant, S. L., Huh, C. et al. 2013. Carbon Dioxide-in-Water Foams Stabilized With Nanoparticles and Surfactant Acting in Synergy. AIChE J. 59 (9): 3490–3501. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14124.
Yu, J., An, C., Mo, D. et al. 2012. Foam Mobility Control for Nanoparticle-Stabilized Supercritical CO2 Foam. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 14–18 April. SPE-153336-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/153336-MS.