Nanomechanical Characterization of the Tensile Modulus of Rupture for Kerogen-Rich Shale
- Katherine L. Hull (Aramco Research Center–Houston) | Younane N. Abousleiman (University of Oklahoma) | Yanhui Han (Aramco Research Center–Houston) | Ghaithan A. Al-Muntasheri (Saudi Aramco) | Peter Hosemann (University of California, Berkeley) | S. Scott Parker (University of California, Berkeley) | Cameron B. Howard (University of California, Berkeley)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- August 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,024 - 1,033
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- micromechanics, cantilever beam, hydraulic fracturing, shale, geomechanics
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 353 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In the past decade, chemical, physical, and mechanical characterization of source-rock reservoirs has moved toward micro- and nanoscale testing and analyses. Nanoindentation is now widely used in many industrial and university laboratories to measure stiffness and strength as well as other mechanical properties of shales. However, to date, tensile failures of shales have not been studied at the micro- or nanoscale.
In this work, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) coupled with a focused ion beam (FIB) and a special nanoindenter (NI) testing configuration (SEM-FIB-NI) is used to bring organic-rich shale samples (preserved Woodford shale from a wellsite in Ada, Oklahoma, USA) to failure in tension. Microcantilever beam geometries were milled and loaded to failure in tension while monitoring in situ with SEM. The force-displacement curves were generated while videos recording in-situ real-time displacements and failures were collected simultaneously.
The microcantilever beam tests of this composite natural material demonstrate linear elastic behavior followed by elastic/plastic yield before complete failure. This behavior was clearly observed to correlate with the amount of organic matter (OM) at the fractured surface of the microcantilever beam supports. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyses were conducted along the prepared microbeam samples before loading. In addition, post-failure EDS analysis was performed on the resulting fractured faces of the failed microbeams, and the correlation between tensile behavior and shale OM content was shown. Large tensile moduli of rupture, or moduli of toughness, were associated with high OM, or kerogen, present at the failed supports of the kerogen-rich-shale (KRS) microcantilever beams. The moduli of toughness as a measure of work or energy needed to bring these samples into tensile failure were ten times less when OM was missing or barely present at the support, in terms of shale microbeam volume.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Abousleiman, Y. and Ulm, F.-J. 2003. The GeoGenomeTM Industry Consortium. JIP Institute Report, The PoroMechanics Institute, University of Oklahoma.
Abousleiman, Y., Tran, M., Hoang, S. et al. 2007. Geomechanics Field and Laboratory Characterization of Woodford Shale: The Next Gas Play. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11–14 November. SPE-110120-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/110120-MS.
Abousleiman, Y., Tran, M., Hoang, S. et al. 2009. Geomechanics Field Characterization of the Two Prolific US Mid-West Gas Plays With Advanced Wire-Line Logging Tools. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4–7 October. SPE-124428-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/124428-MS.
Abousleiman, Y., Hull, K., Han, Y. et al. 2016. The Granular and Polymer Nature of Kerogen Rich Shale. Acta Geotechnica 11: 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0435-y.
Bennett, K. C., Berla, L. A., Nix, W. D. et al. 2015. Instrumented Nanoindentation and 3D Mechanistic Modeling of a Shale at Multiple Scales. Acta Geotechnica 10: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0363-7.
Biot, M. A. 1941. General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation. J. Applied Physics 12 (2): 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886.
Bitz, Sister M. C. and Nagy, B. 1966. Ozonolysis of “Polymer-Type” Material in Coal, Kerogen, and in the Orgeuil Meteorite: A Preliminary Report. Chemistry, PNAS 56: 1383–1390.
Chalmers, G. R., Bustin, R. M., and Power, I. M. 2012. Characterization of Gas Shale Pore Systems by Porosimetry, Pycnometry, Surface Area, and Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy/Transmission Electron Microscopy Image Analyses: Examples From the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig Units. AAPG Bull. 96 (6): 1099–1119. http://dx.doi.lorg/10.1306/10171111052.
Curtis, M. E., Ambrose, R. J., Sondergeld, C. H. et al. 2010. Structural Characterization of Gas Shales on the Micro- and Nano-Scales. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 19–21 October. SPE-137693-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/137693-MS.
Davidovits, J. 2015. Geopolymers Chemistry & Applications, fourth edition. 644 pages.
Feng, Y., Van Le Doan, T., and Pomerantz, A. E. 2013. The Chemical Composition of Bitumen in Pyrolyzed Green River Oil Shale: Characterization by 13C NMR Spectroscopy. Energy & Fuels 27: 7314–7323. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef4016685.
Frazer, D., Abad, M. D., Krumwiede, D. et al. 2015. Localized Mechanical Property Assessment of Sic/Sic Composite Materials. Composites: Part A 70: 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.008.
Han, Y., Al-Muntasheri, G., Hull, K. et al. 2016. Tensile Mechanical Behavior of Kerogen and Its Potential Implication to Fracture Opening in Kerogen-Rich Shales (KRS). Accepted for presentation at the 50th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, 26–29 June. ARMA 16-86.
Hill, R. 1963. Elastic Properties of Reinforced Solids: Some Theoretical Principles. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11: 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X.
Hosemann, P., Swadener, J. G., Kiener, D. et al. 2008. An Exploratory Study to Determine Applicability of Nano-Hardness and Micro-Compression Measurements for Yield Stress Estimation. Journal of Nuclear Materials 375: 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.11.004.
Hosemann, P., Martos, J. N., Frazer, D. et al. 2013. Mechanical Characteristics of SiC Coating Layer in TRISO Fuel Particles. Journal of Nuclear Materials 442: 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.08.041.
Hull, K. L. and Abousleiman, Y. 2016. Insights on the REV of Source Shale from Nano- and Micromechanics. In New Frontiers in Oil and Gas Exploration, first edition, ed. C. Jin and G. Cusatis, Chapter 10, pp. 335–366, Switzerland: Springer.
Kelemen, S. R., Walters, C. C., Ertas, D. et al. 2006. Petroleum Expulsion Part 2. Organic Matter Type and Maturity Effects on Kerogen Swelling by Solvents and Thermodynamic Parameters for Kerogen From Regular Solution Theory. Energy & Fuels 20: 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0580220.
Kim, D., Lai, H.-T., Chilingar, G. V. et al. 2006. Geopolymer Formation and Its Unique Properties. Environ. Geol. 51: 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0308-z.
Larsen, J. W. and Li, S. 1997. Changes in the Macromolecular Structure of a Type I Kerogen During Maturation. Energy & Fuels 11: 897–901. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef970007a.
Lazar, O. R., Bohc, K. M., Macquaker, J. H. S. et al. 2015. Capturing Key Attributes of Fine-Grained Sedimentary Rocks in Outcrops, Cores, and Thin Sections: Nomenclature andDescriptionGuidelines. Journal of Sedimentary Research 85: 230–246. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2015.11.
Ma, J., Couples, G., Jiang, Z. et al. 2014. A Multi-Scale Framework for Digital Core Analysis of Gas Shale at Millimeter Scales. URTEC-1934450-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2014-1934450.
Maio, D. D. and Roberts, S. G. 2005. Measuring Fracture Toughness of Coatings Using Focused-Ion-Beam-Machined Microbeams. J. Mater. Res. 20: 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2005.0048.
Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M. 1992. An Improved Technique for Determining Hardness and Elastic Modulus Using Load and Displacement Sensing Indentation Experiments. J. Mater. Res. 19: 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.1564.
Passey, Q. R., Bohacs, K.M., Esch,W. L. et al. 2010. From Oil-Prone Source Rock to Gas-Producing Shale Reservoir–Geologic and Petrophysical Characterization of Unconventional Shale-Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the CPS/SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing, 8–10 June. SPE-131350-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/131350-MS.
Schuler, B., Meyer, G., Peña, D. et al. 2015. Unraveling the Molecular Structures of Asphaltenes by Atomic Force Microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137: 9870–9876. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b04056.
Sierra, R., Tran, M. H., Abousleiman, Y. N. et al. 2010. Woodford Shale Mechanical Properties and the Impacts of Lithofacies. Presented at the 44th US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 5th US Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, Salt Lake City, Utah, 27–30 June.
Tegelaar, E. W., De Leeuw, J. W., Derenne, S. et al. 1989. A Reappraisal of Kerogen Formation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 53: 3103–3106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90191-9.
Ulm, J-F. and Abousleiman, Y. 2006. The Nanogranular Nature of Shale. Acta Geotechnica 1 (2): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-006-0009-5.
Wei, Z., Gao, X., Zhang, D. et al. 2005. Assessment of Thermal Evolution of Kerogen Geopolymers With Their Structural Parameters Measured by Solid-State 13C NMR Spectroscopy. Energy & Fuels 19 (1): 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0498566.
Zeszotarski, J. C., Chromik, R. R., Vinci, R. P. et al. 2004. Imaging and Mechanical Property Measurements of Kerogen via Nanoindentation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 68 (20): 4113–4119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2003.11.031.