A Material-Balance Equation for Stress-Sensitive Shale-Gas-Condensate Reservoirs
- Daniel Orozco (University of Calgary) | Roberto Aguilera (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- February 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 197 - 214
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Original Gas in Place, Original Condensate in Place, Material Balance Equation, Shale Gas Condensate Reservoirs, Free, Adsorbed and Dissolved Gas
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 455 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
During the last few years, production of liquid hydrocarbons has been reported from the gas-condensate window of the Eagle Ford, Barnett, Niobrara, and Marcellus shale plays in the US. This paper presents a new material-balance equation (MBE) for estimation of original gas in place (OGIP) and original condensate in place (OCIP) in shale-gas-condensate reservoirs. This material-balance methodology allows estimating the critical time for implementing gas injection in those cases in which condensate buildup represents a problem. In addition, the proposed MBE considers the effects of free, adsorbed, and dissolved gas-condensate production, and also takes into account the stress-dependency of porosity and permeability. An extension of the methodology is implemented for estimating the optimum time for hydraulically refracturing shale-condensate reservoirs.
The new MBE applies to shale-gas-condensate reservoirs by incorporating a two-phase gas-deviation factor (Z2) and total cumulative gas production (Gpt) that includes both gas and condensate. If a crossplot of P/Z2 (pressure/Z2) vs. Gpt is prepared for a conventional gas-condensate reservoir, a single straight line is obtained. However, when the single-phase gas-compressibility factor (Z) is used, a deviation from the linear behavior is observed after the reservoir pressure falls below the gas dewpoint. This methodology is applied in this study to unconventional shale-gas condensate. Because there are three characteristic stages of production in a shale-gas reservoir (production of free, adsorbed, and dissolved gas), the location of the aforementioned deviation will provide a hint of the production stage that will be affected by condensate buildup. For example, if the deviation point is in the region where production of free gas is predominant, then the production caused by desorption mechanisms will be negatively affected because condensation will have already occurred in the reservoir, resulting in reduction of effective permeability to gas. This methodology then allows estimating the critical time for implementing gas injection on the basis of the total cumulative gas production. The method also permits estimating the optimum time for refracturing. The refracturing can be of a normal size for a given shale (similar to the original fracturing job), or it can be a superfrac job.
Results are presented as crossplots of (1) P/Z2 vs. Gpt, (2) Gpt vs. time, and (3) gas rate vs. time. It is concluded that estimation of the critical time for implementing gas injection is useful for improving the performance of those shale-gas-condensate reservoirs in which condensate buildup represents a threat that can negatively affect the gas-production rate.
The novelty of this work resides on the fact that the combined effect of free, adsorbed, and dissolved gas-production mechanisms on stress-sensitive shale-gas-condensate reservoirs had not been considered previously in the literature for estimation of OGIP, OCIP, and reservoir performance with an analytical MBE. The inclusion of gas injection and refracturing had not been considered either.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Aguilera, R. 2008. Effect of Fracture Compressibility on Gas-In-Place Calculations of Stress-Sensitive Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng 11 (2). SPE-100451-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/100451-PA.
Aguilera, R. and Harding, T. 2011. GFREE Research Program. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October –2 November. SPE-147282-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/147282-MS.
Aguilera, R. 2014. Flow Units: From Conventional to Tight-Gas to Shale-Gas to Tight-Oil to Shale-Oil Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng 17 (02). SPE-165360-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/165360-PA.
Ahmed, T. 2006. Reservoir Engineering Handbook, third edition. Burlington, Massachusetts: Elsevier.
Altman, R., Fan, L., Sinha, S. et al. 2014. Understanding Mechanisms for Liquid Dropout From Horizontal Shale Gas Condensate Wells. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 27–29 October. SPE-170983-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/170983-MS.
Cabrapán Duarte, J. C., Caliz, E. A., and Ciancaglini, M. 2014. Material Balance Analysis of Naturally or Artificially Fractured Shale Gas Reservoirs to Maximize Final Recovery. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Maracaibo, Venezuela, 21–23 May. SPE-169480-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169480-MS.
Didar, R. and Akkutlu, I. Y. 2013. Pore-Size Dependence of Fluid Phase Behavior and the Impact on Shale Gas Reserves. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, 12–14 August. URTEC-1624453-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/urtec2013-183.
Etminan, S., Javadpour, F., Maini, B. et al. 2014. Measurement of Gas Storage Processes in Shale and of the Molecular Diffusion Coefficient in Kerogen. International Journal of Coal Geology 123: 10–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.10.007.
Fan, L., Martin, R. B., Thompson, J. W. et al. 2011. An Integrated Approach for Understanding Oil and Gas Reserves Potential in Eagle Ford Shale Formation. Paper presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15–17 November. SPE-148751-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/148751-MS.
Hunter, W., Turner, M., Villalobos, J. et al. 2015. Systematic Candidate Selection Improves Haynesville Refracturing Economics. World Oil Magazine 236 (12).
Ismail, M. and Horne, R. 2014. An Investigation of Gas-Condensate Flow in Liquid-Rich Shales. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference–USA, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 1–3 April. SPE-169021-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169021-MS.
Javadpour, F., Fisher, D., and Unsworth, M. 2007. Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments. J Can Pet Technol 46 (10). PETSOC-07-10-06. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/07-10-06.
Javadpour, F. 2009. Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow in Mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone). J Can Pet Technol 48 (8). PETSOC-09-08-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/09-08-16.
Jones, F.O. 1975. A Laboratory Study of the Effects of Confining Pressure on Fracture Flow and Storage Capacity in Carbonate Rocks. J Pet Technol 27 (1). SPE-4569-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4569-PA.
Joshi, S. 1991. Horizontal Well Technology. Tulsa: PennWell Books.
Lopez, B. and Aguilera, R. 2013. Evaluation of Quintuple Porosity in Shale Petroleum Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 20–22 August. SPE-165681-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/165681-MS.
Lopez, B. and Aguilera, R. 2014. Petrophysical Quantification of Multiple Porosities in Shale Petroleum Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference–Canada, Calgary, 30 September–2 October. SPE-171638-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/171638-MS.
Lopez, B. and Aguilera, R. 2015. Sorption-Dependent Permeability of Shales. Presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 20–22 October. SPE-175922-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/175922-MS.
Lopez, B., Piedrahita, J., and Aguilera, R. 2015. Estimates of Stress Dependent Properties in Tight Reservoirs From Drill Cuttings Data. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Quito, Ecuador, 18–20 November. SPE-177189-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/177189-MS.
McCain, W. 1990. The Properties of Petroleum Fluids, second edition. Tulsa: PennWell Books.
Meisenhelder, J. 2013. Shale 2.0: From Efficient to Effective Shale Development. J Pet Technol 65 (7): 18–21. SPE-0713-0018-JPT. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0713-0018-JPT.
Orozco, D. and Aguilera, R. 2015. A Material Balance Equation for Stress-Sensitive Shale Gas Reservoirs Considering the Contribution of Free, Adsorbed and Dissolved Gas. Presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 20–22 October. SPE-175964-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/175964-MS.
Oruganti, Y., Mittal, R., McBurney, C. et al. 2015. Re-Fracturing in Eagle Ford and Bakken to Increase Reserves and Generate Incremental NPV—Field Study. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 3–5 February. SPE-173340-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173340-MS.
Raghavan, R., Chun Chu, W., and Jones, J. R. 1999. Practical Considerations in the Analysis of Gas-Condensate Well Tests. SPE Res Eval & Eng 2 (3): 288–295. SPE-56837-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/56837-PA.
Ramirez, J. and Aguilera, R. 2016. Factors Controlling Fluid Migration and Distribution in the Eagle Ford Shale. SPE Res Eng. SPE-171626-PA (in press; posted 16 June 2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/171626-PA.
Rayes, D., Piper, L., and McCain, W. 1992. Two-Phase Compressibility Factors for Retrograde Gases. SPE Form Eval 7 (1): 87–92. SPE-20055-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20055-PA.
Rojas, G. 2003. Ingeniería de Yacimientos de Gas Condensado. Universidad de Oriente. Puerto La Cruz, Venezuela.
Schilthuis, R. 1936. Active Oil and Reservoir Energy. In Transactions of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Vol. 118, Part 1, 33–52, SPE-936033-G. Richardson, Texas: SPE. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/936033-G.
Swami, V., Settari, A. (Tony), and Javadpour, F. 2013. A Numerical Model for Multi-mechanism Flow in Shale Gas Reservoirs With Application to Laboratory Scale Testing. Presented at the EAGE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE Europec, London, 10–13 June. SPE-164840-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/164840-MS.
Walser, D. 2016. Leveraging Subsurface Insight, Screening, and Diversion Technology in Refracturing. J Pet Technol 68 (1): 25–27. SPE-0116-0025-JPT. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0116-0025-JPT.
Walsh, J. B. 1981. Effect of Pore Pressure and Confining Pressure on Fracture Permeability. International Journal of Rock Mechanics, Minerals, Science & Geomechanics 18 (5): 429–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(81)90006-1.
Wang, Y. 2015. Controlling Factors on Condensate Production From the Eagle Ford Shale. MSc thesis, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary (June).
Wu, P. and Aguilera, R. 2012. Investigation of Gas Shales at Nanoscale Using Scan Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-159887-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/159887-MS.