Pressure-Transient Analysis of Bottomhole Pressure and Rate Measurements by Use of System-Identification Techniques
- Mehdi Mansoori (Delft University of Technology; Sharif University of Technology) | Paul Van den Hof (Eindhoven University of Technology) | Jan-Dirk Jansen (Delft University of Technology) | Davood Rashtchian (Sharif University of Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- October 2015
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,005 - 1,027
- 2015.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- pressure transient analysis, system identification, continuous downhole data, well testing
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 392 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This study presents a novel perspective on pressure-transient analysis (PTA) of downhole-pressure and flow-rate data by use of system-identification (SI) techniques as widely used in advanced process engineering. Key features of the paper are that it considers the classic PTA process from a system-theoretical perspective; derives the causal structure of the flow dynamics; proposes a method to deal with continuously varying pressure and flow-rate signals contaminated with correlated noise, which estimates physical reservoir parameters through a systematic matching procedure in the frequency domain; and can cope with arbitrary (i.e., not necessarily piecewise constant) flow-rate signals. To this end, the wellbore and the reservoir are modeled as two distinct two-port power-transmitting systems that are bilaterally coupled at their common boundary. This structure reveals that, from an SI perspective, the wellbore dynamics affect the bottomhole data as a feedback mechanism. Because of this feedback structure, it is necessary to use closed-loop SI techniques, and, because of the presence of sensor noise, the reservoir model cannot be identified solely from the bottomhole measurements. Therefore, an auxiliary signal is needed, for which we choose the surface flow rate, although other signals, such as the bottomhole temperature, could potentially also be used. Then a suitable closed-loop SI technique is the so-called two-stage method. The first stage of the algorithm removes the dynamic effects of the wellbore from the noisy data, and the second stage identifies the reservoir model in terms of rational polynomials. Thereafter, the usual physical reservoir parameters (e.g., averaged permeability and skin factor) are obtained through matching the results of the identified reservoir model and those of typical analytical reservoir models in the frequency domain, as an alternative to classic graphical or numerical type-curve analysis. The method does not rely on a piecewise constant approximation of the flow-rate signal, unlike other known PTA methods such as time-domain deconvolution. Six numerical experiments, by use of a synthetic data set, and one field example, by use of data from a real gas well, illustrate the key aspects of the proposed method.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||23|
Ahn, S. and Horne, R. 2011. The Use of Attenuation and Phase Shift to Estimate Permeability Distributions from Pulse Tests. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-146636-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/146636-MS.
Al-Hussainy, R., Ramey, H. Jr., Crawford, P. et al. 1966. The Flow of Real Gases Through Porous Media. J Pet Technol 18 (5): 624–636. SPE-1243-A-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1243-A-PA.
Athichanagorn, S. 1999. Development of an Interpretation Methodology for Long-Term Pressure Data from Permanent Downhole Gauges. PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, California (June 1999).
Baygü, B., Kuchuk, F. and Arikan, O. 1997. Deconvolution Under Normalized Autocorrelation Constraints. SPE J. 2 (3): 246–253. SPE-28405-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28405-PA.
Bosgra, O. 2010. Physical Modelling for Systems and Control. Delft University of Technology. http://www.pvandenhof.nl/Reportfiles/Bosgra2010.pdf.
Bourgeois, M. and Horne, R. N. 1993. Well Test Model Recognition Using LaPlace Space Type Curves. SPE Form Eval 8 (1): 17–25. SPE-22682-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22682-PA.
Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M. and Reinsel, G. C. 1994. Times Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, third edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Carr, N. L., Kobayashi, R., and Burrows, D. B. 1954. Viscosity of Hydrocarbon Gases Under Pressure. J Pet Technol 6 (10): 47–55. SPE-297-G. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/297-G.
Chaudhry, M. H. 1979. Applied Hydraulic Transients. New York City: Van Nostrand Reinhold Inc.
Cheng, Y., Lee, W. J. and McVay, D. A. 2005. Application of Fast Fourier Transforms to Deconvolution of Multirate Well-Test Data. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9–12 October. SPE-96032-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/96032-MS.
Forssell, U. and Ljung, L. 1999. Closed-Loop Identification Revisited. Automatica 35 (7): 1215–1241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00022-9.
Gringarten, A. 2008. From Straight Lines to Deconvolution: The Evolution of the State of the Art in Well Test Analysis. SPE Res Eval & Eng 11 (1): 41–62. SPE-102079-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102079-PA.
Gustavsen, B. and Semlyen, A. 1999. Rational Approximation of Frequency Domain Responses by Vector Fitting. IEEE Trans. Power
Deliver. 14 (3): 1052–1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/61.772353.
Hassanzadeh, H. and Pooladi-Darvish, M. 2007. Comparison of Different Numerical Laplace Inversion Methods for Engineering Applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 189 (2): 1966–1981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.12.072.
Kamal, M. M. and Abbaszadeh, M. 2009. Transient Well Testing. Richardson, Texas: Monograph Series, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Kappa Saphir (Ecrin package, evaluation version). 2015. http://www.kappaeng.com/software/saphir. Accessed 2 April 2015.
Kuchuk, F. 1990. Applications of Convolution and Deconvolution to Transient Well Tests. SPE Form Eval 5 (4): 375–384. SPE-16394-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16394-PA.
Kuchuk, F. J., Onur, M. and Hollaender, F. 2010. Pressure Transient Formation and Well Testing: Convolution, Deconvolution and Nonlinear Estimation, Vol. 57. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Kuiper, I. T. J. 2009. Well Testing in the Framework of System Identification–An Exploratory Study. Master’s thesis, Delft University
of Technology, the Netherlands (February 2009).
Levitan, M. 2005. Practical Application of Pressure-Rate Deconvolution to Analysis of Real Well Tests. SPE Res Eval & Eng 8 (2): 113–121. SPE-84290-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84290-PA.
Ljung, L. 1999. System Identification: Theory for the User. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Mansoori, M., Dankers, A. and Van den Hof, P. 2014. Errors-in-Variables Identification in Bilaterally Coupled Systems with Application to Oil Well Testing. Proc., 19th IFAC World Congress, Cape Town, South Africa, 24–29 August, Vol. 1, 4656–4661. http://dx.doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01491.
Mansoori, M., Dankers, A., Van den Hof, P. et al. In press. Underground Reservoir Identification using Generalized Wellbore Data. 17th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, 19–21 October, Beijing, China (submitted February 15, 2015).
MathWorks. 2015. System Identification Toolbox. http://www.mathworks.com/products/sysid/.
Nomura, M. and Horne, R. N. 2009. Data Processing and Interpretation of Well Test Data as a Nonparametric Regression Problem. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, San Jose, California, 24–26 March. SPE-120511-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/120511-MS.
Onur, M. and Reynolds, A. 1998. Well Testing Applications of Numerical Laplace Transformation of Sampled-Data. SPE Res Eval & Eng 1 (3): 268–277. SPE-36554-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36554-PA.
Oppenheim, A. V., Schafer, R. W. and Buck, J. R. 1999. Discrete-Time Signal Processing, Vol. 5. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Pimonov, E., Ayan, C., Onur, M. et al. 2010. A New Pressure/Rate-Deconvolution Algorithm To Analyze Wireline Formation-Tester and Well-Test Data. SPE Res Eval & Eng 13 (4): 603–613. SPE-123982-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/123982-PA.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. et al. 2007. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, third edition, Section 5.12 Padé Approximants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roumboutsos, A. and Stewart, G. 1988. A Direct Deconvolution or Convolution Algorithm for Well Test Analysis. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 2–5 October. SPE-18157-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18157-MS.
Söderström, T. 2007. Errors-in-Variables Methods in System Identification. Automatica 43 (6): 939–958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2006.11.025.
Söderström, T., Wang, L., Pintelon, R. et al. 2013. Can Errors-in-Variables Systems be Identified from Closed-Loop Experiments? Automatica 49 (2): 681–684, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2012.11.017.
Stehfest, H. 1970. Algorithm 368: Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms. Comm. ACM 13 (1): 47–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/361953.361969.
Van den Hof, P. M. J. 1998. Closed-Loop Issues in System Identification. Annu. Rev. Control 22: 173–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5788(98)00016-9.
Van den Hof, P. M. J. and Schrama, R. J. 1993. An Indirect Method for Transfer Function Estimation from Closed Loop Data. Automatica 29 (6): 1523–1527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(93)90015-L.
von Schroeter, T., Hollaender, F. and Gringarten, A. C. 2004. Deconvolution of Well-Test Data as a Nonlinear Total Least-Squares Problem. SPE J. 9 (4): 375–390. SPE-77688-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/77688-PA.