Mechanistic Simulation of Polymer Injectivity in Field Tests
- Mohammad Lotfollahi (University of Texas at Austin) | Rouhi Farajzadeh (Shell Global Solutions International; Delft University of Technology) | Mojdeh Delshad (University of Texas at Austin) | Al-Khalil Al-Abri (Petroleum Development Oman) | Bart M. Wassing (Petroleum Development Oman) | Rifaat Al-Mjeni (Petroleum Development Oman) | Kamran Awan (Petroleum Development Oman) | Pavel Bedrikovetsky (University of Adelaide)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- August 2016
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,178 - 1,191
- 2016.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Polymer Injection, Polymer retention, Polymer Junk, Deep bed filtration, Injectivity
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 786 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Polymer flooding is one of the most widely used chemical enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) methods because of its simplicity and low cost. To achieve high oil recoveries, large quantities of polymer solution are often injected through a small wellbore. Sometimes, the economic success of the project is only feasible when injection rate is high for high-viscosity solution. However, injection of viscous polymer solutions has been a concern for the field application of polymer flooding.
The pressure increase in polymer injectors can be attributed to (1) formation of an oil bank, (2) polymer rheology (shear-thickening behavior near wellbore), and (3) plugging of the reservoir pores by insoluble polymer molecules or suspended particles in the water.
In this paper, a new model to history match field injection-rate/pressure data is proposed. The pertinent equations for deep-bed filtration and external-cake buildup in radial coordinates were coupled to the viscoelastic polymer rheology to capture important mechanisms. Radial coordinates were selected to minimize the velocity/shear-rate errors caused by gridblock size in the Cartesian coordinates.
The filtration theory was used and the field data history matched successfully. Systematic simulations were performed, and the impact of adsorption (retention), shear thickening, deep-bed filtration, and external-cake formation was investigated to explain the well-injectivity behavior of polymer. The simulation results indicate that the gradual increase in bottomhole pressure (BHP) during early times is attributed to the shear-thickening rheology at high velocities experienced by viscoelastic hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) polymers around the wellbore and the permeability reduction caused by polymer adsorption and internal filtration of undissolved polymer. However, the linear impedance during external-cake growth is responsible for the sharper increase in injection pressure at the later times.
One can use the proposed model to calculate the injectivity of the polymer-injection wells, understand the contribution of different phenomena to the pressure rise in the wells, locate the plugging or damage that may be caused by polymer, and accordingly design the chemical stimulation if necessary.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Al-Abduwani, F. A. H., Bedrikovetsky, P., Farajzadeh, R. et al. 2005a. External Filter Cake Erosion: Mathematical Model and Experimental Study. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, Sheveningen, The Netherlands, 25–27 May. SPE-94635-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94635-MS.
Al-Abduwani, F. A. H., Farajzadeh, R., van den Broek, W. et al. 2005b. Filtration of Micron-Sized Particles in Granular Media Revealed by XRay Computed Tomography. Review of Scientific Instruments 76: 103704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2103467.
Bedrikovetsky, P., Fonseca, D. R., da Silva, M. J. et al. 2005. Well-History-Based Prediction of Injectivity Decline in Offshore Waterfloods. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference and Exhibition, Rio de Janeiro, 20–23 June. SPE-93885-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93885-MS.
Carreau, P. J. 1968. Rheological Equations From Molecular Network Theories. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Clemens, T., Deckers, M., Kornberger, M. et al. 2013. Polymer Solution Injection—Near Wellbore Dynamics and Displacement Efficiency, Pilot Test Results, Matzen Field, Austria. Presented at the EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE Europec, London, 10–13 June. SPE-164904-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/164904-MS.
da Silva, M., Bedrikovetsky, P., Van den Broek, W. M. G. T. 2004. A New Method for Injectivity Impairment Characterization From Well and Coreflood Data. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26–29 September. SPE-89885-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89885-MS.
De Paiva, R. O., Bedrikovetsky, P. G., Furtado, C. 2006. A Comprehensive Model for Injectivity Decline Prediction During PWRI. Presented at the SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 12–15 June. SPE-100334-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/100334-MS.
Delshad, M., Pope, G. A., and Sepehrnoori, K. 1996. A Compositional Simulator for Modeling Surfactant Enhanced Aquifer Remediation. J. Contaminant Hydrology 23: 303–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(95)00106-9.
Delshad, M., Kim, D. H., Magbagbeola, O. A. et al. 2008. Mechanistic Interpretation and Utilization of Viscoelastic Behavior of Polymer Solutions for Improved Polymer-Flood Efficiency. Presented at the SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 20–23 April. SPE-113620-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/113620-MS.
Delshad, M. 2013. The University of Texas Chemical Flooding Simulator, UTCHEM. The University of Texas at Austin.
Farajzadeh, R., Lotfolalhi, M., and Bedrikovetsky, P. 2015. Simultaneous Sorption and Mechanical Entrapment During Polymer Flow Through Porous Media. Presented at SPE Kuwait Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Mishref, Kuwait, 11–14 October. SPE-175380-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/175380-MS.
Gumpenberger, T., Deckers, M., Kornberger, M. et al. 2012. Experiments and Simulation of the Near-Wellbore Dynamics and Displacement Efficiencies of Polymer Injection, Matzen Field, Austria. Presented at the International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, 11–14 November. SPE-161029-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/161029-MS.
Hirasaki, G. J. and Pope, G. A. 1974. Analysis of Factors Influencing Mobility and Adsorption in the Flow of Polymer Solution Through Porous Media. SPE J. 14 (4): 337–346. SPE-4026-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4026-PA.
Kalantariasl, A., Zeinijahromi, A., and Bedrikovetsky, P. 2014. Axi-Symmetric Two-Phase Suspension-Colloidal Flow in Porous Media During Water Injection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (40): 15763–15775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie502312c.
Koh, H. 2015. Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Polymers on Residual Oil Saturation. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Lake, L. W., Johns, R. T., Pope, G. A. et al. 2014. Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Richardson, Texas: SPE.
Li., Z. and Delshad, M. 2014. Development of an Analytical Injectivity Model for Non-Newtonian Polymer Solutions. SPE J. 19 (3): 381–389. SPE-163672-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/163672-PA.
Lin, E. C. 1981. A Study of Micellar/Polymer Flooding Using a Compositional Simulator. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Ochi, J., Detienne, J. L., Rivet, P. et al. 1999. External Filter Cake Properties During Injection of Produced Waters. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, 31 May–1 June. SPE-54773-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/54773-MS.
Pang, S. and Sharma M. M. 1997. A Model for Predicting Injectivity Decline in Water-Injection Wells. SPE Form Eval. 12 (3): 194–201. SPE-28489-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28489-PA.
Sharma, M. M., Pang, S., Wennberg, K. E. et al. 2000. Injectivity Decline in Water-Injection Wells: An Offshore Gulf of Mexico Case Study. SPE Prod & Fac 15 (1): 6–13. SPE-60901-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/60901-PA.
Sharma, A., Delshad, M., Huh, C. et al. 2010. A Practical Method to Calculate Polymer Viscosity Accurately in Numerical Reservoir Simulators. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October–2 November. SPE-147239-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/147239-MS.
Sorbie, K. S. 1991. Polymer-Improved Oil Recovery. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, Inc.
Wennberg, K. E., and Sharma, M. M. 1997. Determination of the Filtration Coefficient and the Transition Time for Water Injection Wells. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, 2–3 June. SPE-38181-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38181-MS.
Wreath, D. G., Pope, G. A., and Sepehrnoori, K. 1990. Dependence of Polymer Apparent Viscosity on the Permeable Media and Flow Conditions. In Situ 14 (3): 263–284.
Yerramilli, S. S., Yerramilli, R. C., and Zitha, P. L. J. 2013. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 5–7 June. SPE-165195-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/165195-MS.
Zechner, M., Clemens, T., Suri, A. et al. 2014. Simulation of Polymer Injection Under Fracturing Conditions—A Field Pilot in the Matzen Field, Austria. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 12–16 April. SPE-169043-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169043-MS.
Zinati, F. F., Farajzadeh, R., Currie, P. K. et al. 2009. Modeling of External Filter Cake Build-Up in Radial Geometry. Petroleum Science and Technology 27: 746–763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916460802105666.