Biotreatment of Hydrate-Inhibitor-Containing Produced Waters at Low pH
- Arnold Janson (ConocoPhillips Global Water Sustainability Center) | Ana Santos (ConocoPhillips Global Water Sustainability Center) | Altaf Hussain (ConocoPhillips Global Water Sustainability Center) | Simon Judd (Qatar University/Cranfield University) | Ana Soares (Cranfield University) | Samer Adham (ConocoPhillips Global Water Sustainability Center)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- December 2015
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,254 - 1,260
- 2015.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- low pH, KHI, MEG, hydrate inhibitor, produced water
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 227 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
With proper treatment to remove organics and inorganics, one can use the produced water (PW) generated during oil-and-gas extraction as process water. Biotreatment is generally regarded as the most cost-effective method for organics removal, and although widely used in industrial wastewater treatment, PW biotreatment installations are limited.
This paper follows up to an earlier paper published in the SPE Journal (Janson et al. 2014). Although the earlier paper assessed the biotreatability of PW from a Qatari gas field from the summer season, this paper focuses on assessing the biotreatability of PW during the winter season [i.e., containing the thermodynamic hydrate inhibitor monoethylene glycol (MEG) and a kinetic hydrate inhibitor (KHI)]. Tests were conducted in batch and continuous reactors under aerobic mixed-culture conditions without pH control during 31 weeks.
The results indicated that one could remove >80% of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total organic carbon (TOC) through biological treatment of PW with 1.5% MEG added. In contrast, biotreatment can remove only ≈43% of COD and TOC present in PW when 1.5% KHI was added as a hydrate inhibitor; 2-butoxyethanol, a solvent in KHI, is extremely biodegradable; it was reduced in concentration from >5000 to <10 mg/L by biotreatment; the KHI polymer though was only partially biodegradable. Cloudpoint tests conducted on PW with 1.5% KHI added showed only an 8°C increase in cloudpoint temperature (from 35 to 43°C). The target cloudpoint temperature of >60°C was not achieved.
Although the feed to the reactors (PW with either KHI or MEG) was at pH 4.5, the reactors stabilized at a pH of 2.6, considered extremely acidic for aerobic bioactivity. The successful operation of an aerobic biological process for an extended period of time at a pH of 2.6 was unexpected, and published reports of bioactivity at that pH are limited. After extensive analytical tests, it was concluded that the pH decrease was caused by the production of an inorganic acid. A mechanism by which hydrochloric acid could be produced biologically was proposed; however, further research in this area by the academic community is recommended.
|File Size||602 KB||Number of Pages||7|
APHA. 2005. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF): Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, twenty-first edition.
Awad, M. F. and Kraume, M. 2011. Fungal Diversity in Activated Sludge From Membrane Bioreactors in Berlin. Can J Microbiol. 57 (8): 693–698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/w11-056.
Dopson, M. and Johnson, D. B. 2012. Biodiversity, Metabolism and Applications of Acidophilic Sulfur-Metabolizing Microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol. 14 (10): 2620–2631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.02749.x.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Alam, M. Z., Idris, A. et al. 2002. Domestic Wastewater Biosolids Accumulation by Liquid State Bioconversion Process for Rapid Composting. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 37 (8): 1533–1543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120013275.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Pendashteh, A., Abdullah, L. C. et al. 2009. Review of Technologies for Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment. J. Hazardous Materials 170: 530–551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044.
Freire, D. D. C., Cammarota, M. C., and Sant’Anna, G. L. 2001. Biological Treatment of Oil Field Wastewater in a Sequencing Batch Reactor. Environ. Technol. 22: 1125–1135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593332208618203.
Hanapi, N. H. M., Alam, M. Z., and Karim, M. I. A. 2011. Optimization of Process Parameters for the Production of Citric Acid Using Sewage Sludge as Major Fermentation Media. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10 (81): 18807–18810. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2757.
Isobe, K., Inoue, I., Takamatsu, Y. et al. 2006. Production of Catalase by Fungi Growing at Low pH and High Temperature. J. Biosci. & Bioeng. 101 (1): 73–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.101.73.
Janson, A., Santos, A., Katebah, M. et al. 2014. Assessing the Biotreatability of Produced Water From a Qatari Gas Field. SPE J. SPE-173188-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173188-PA (in press; posted 3 December 2014).
Kose, B., Ozgun, H., Ersahin, M. E. et al. 2012. Performance Evaluation of a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of Brackish Oil and Natural Gas Field Produced Water. Desalination 285: 295–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.016.
Macalady, J. L., Jones, D. S., and Lyon, E. H. 2007. Extremely Acidic, Pendulous Cave Wall Biofilms From the Frasassi Cave System, Italy. Environ. Microbiol. 9: 1402–1414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01256.x.
Mannan, S., Fakhru'l-Razi, A., and Alam, M. Z. 2005. Use of Fungi To Improve Bioconversion of Activated Sludge. Water Res. 39 (13): 2935–2943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.074.
Matos, M., Pereira, M. A., Nicolau, A. et al. 2012. Influence of the Organic Loading Rate on the Growth of Galactomyces Geotrichum in Activated Sludge. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 47 (4): 565–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2012.650563.
Metcalf and Eddy. 2004. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, fourth edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pendashteh, A. R., Abdullaha, L. C., Fakhru’l-Razi, A. et al. 2012. Evaluation of Membrane Bioreactor for Hypersaline Oily Wastewater Treatment. Process Safety & Environ. Protection 90: 4555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.07.006.
Pendashteh, A. R., Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Chuah, T. G. et al. 2010. Biological Treatment of Produced Water in a Sequencing Batch Reactor by a Consortium of Isolated Halophilic Microorganisms. Environ. Technol. 31 (11): 1229–1239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593331003646612.
Sharghi, E. A., Bonakdarpour, B., Roustazade, P. et al. 2013. The Biological Treatment of High Salinity Synthetic Oilfield Produced Water in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Using a Halophilic Bacterial Consortium. J. Chemical Technol. Biotechnol. 88: 2016–2026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4061.
Tellez, G. T., Nirmalakhandan, N., and Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. 2005. Kinetic Evaluation of a Field-Scale Activated Sludge System for Removing Petroleum Hydrocarbons From Oilfield-Produced Water. Environ. Progress 24 (1): 96–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.10042.
Thunderhouse Instruments. http://thunderhouse4-yuri.blogspot.com/2012/05/geotrichum-candidum (accessed 16 February 2014).