Overcoming Environmental and Technical Challenges for Well Cementing: A Global Perspective
- Carl R. Johnson (Schlumberger) | Nikhil Dilip Shindgikar (Schlumberger) | Muriel Martin Beurel (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- February 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 12 - 27
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Well intergrity, Environment, Product development, Green Chemistry, Regulations
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 359 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Globally, there is an increasing focus on hydrocarbon recovery in regions that are new to environmental legislation and regulation; very often, these are offshore environments where well integrity has broad effects. Providing environmentally compliant fluids is becoming a standard, and thus expertise in regulations and “green” chemistry is rapidly being pulled from established regions such as the North Sea. The expectation that both regulations and necessary chemistry can be slotted into the new region’s operations is difficult to achieve because there is no single set or universal set of regulations; therefore, there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution.
This paper addresses numerous distinct challenges for cementing-related fluids and how the changing regulatory stage across different regions can be optimally managed. Indeed, because these regions can be “frontier” or remote in nature, emphasis on cost control from operators is high to minimize the well-construction cost. This may not align with environmental compliance expectations. Particular examples from West Africa will be presented to highlight challenges toward conformity with the aim of discussing the pitfalls and potential solutions available.
Environmental regulations and practices are continually evolving, and they come under increasing scrutiny at the well-planning stage, with heavy emphasis on well integrity and cementing quality. The most-legislated region of offshore exploration and production is the North Sea, and, naturally, governing bodies and operators are adopting North Sea regulatory models elsewhere. Through case histories covering North Sea, French Guiana, and West Africa, a systematic review of the numerous approaches governing the application of cementing fluids for well integrity will be deliberated. An innovative “green” chemistry solution for high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) operations, developed to tackle compliance with Norwegian North Sea regulations, will act as key example of steps taken to safeguard global environmentally sensitive regions and ensure long-term well integrity.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||16|
API RP 10B-2, RP for Testing Well Cements, first edition. 2005. Washington, DC: API.
Arctic Council, Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment Working Group. 2009. Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines, 29 April 2009, http://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/document-archive/category/233-3-energy, document ACSAO-NO04_3_2_Arctic_Offshore_Oil_Gas_Guidelines.pdf (accessed 6 December 2014).
Australian Government Department of Health. 2014. Australia Inventory of Chemical Substances, http://www.nicnas.gov.au/regulation-andcompliance/aics (accessed 6 December 2014).
Cefas. 2014a. Chemical Hazard and Risk Assessment. Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), http://www.cefas.defra.gov.uk/industry-information/offshore-chemical-notification-scheme/hazard-assessment.aspx (accessed 6 December 2014).
Cefas. 2014b. United Kingdom National Plan for the phase-out of substances identified as candidates for substitution. Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), http://www.cefas.defra.gov.uk/media/439806/uk%20national%20(substitution)%20-plan%20(5%20dec%202010).pdf (accessed 6 December 2014).
CLP-Regulation (EC) 1272/2008. 2008. European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/documents/classification/index_en.htm#h2-1 (accessed 6 December 2014).
Directive 67/548/EEC. 2008. Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances. European Agency for Health and Safety at Work, https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/exposure-tochemical-agents-and-chemical-safety/osh-related-aspects/58 (accessed 6 December 2014).
Directive 76/769/EEC. 1976. Council Directive on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Relating to Restrictions on the Marketing and Use of Certain Dangerous Substances and Preparations, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31976L0769&from=EN (accessed 6 December 2014).
Executive Decree 97/14. Angola Ministe´rio dos Petro´leos. 2014. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Legal Office, http://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ang132871.pdf (accessed 6 December 2014).
Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum. 2013. Environmental Risk Assessment of Chemicals used in WA Petroleum Activities Guideline, Version 1a, August 2013, http://www.dmp.wa.gov.au/documents/ENV-PEB-165.pdf (accessed 6 December 2014).
Health and Safety Executive. 2014. What is REACH? http://www.hse.gov.uk/reach/whatisreach.htm (accessed 6 December 2014).
National Energy Board. 2009. Offshore Chemical Selection Guidelines for Drilling & Production Activities on Frontier Lands, Government of Canada Publications, http://www.publications.gc.ca/site/eng/348774/publication.html (accessed 6 December 2014).
OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Section 3: Degradation and Accumulation. http://www.oecd-library.org/environment/oecd-guidelines-for-the-testing-of-chemicals-section-3-degradation-and-accumulation_2074577x (accessed 6 December 2014).
OSPAR Protocols on Methods for the Testing of Chemicals Used in the Offshore Oil Industry. OSPAR Commission, http://www.ospar.org/documents/DBASE/DECRECS/Agreements/05-11ef_protocols%20fish%20toxicity%20testing.doc (accessed 6 December 2014).
OSPAR Recommendation 2006/3 on Environmental Goals for the Discharge by the Offshore Industry of Chemicals that Are, or Which Contain Substances Identified as Candidates for Substitution. OSPAR Commission, http://www.ospar.org/ (accessed 6 December 2014).
Thatcher, M., Robson, M. and Henriquez, L. R. 2005. CHARM Chemical Hazard Assessment and Risk Management for the Use and Discharge of Chemicals Used Offshore, Version 1.4. CHARM Implementation Network, 3 February 2005, http://www.eosca.eu/wpcontent/uploads/CHARM-User-Guide-Version-1.4.pdf (accessed 6 December 2014).
US Geological Survey, 2008. 90 Billion Barrels of Oil and 1,670 Trillion Cubic Feet of Natural Gas Assessed in the Arctic. 23 July 2008, http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1980#.VIORIjHF_wg.