An Equation-of-State Model To Predict Surfactant/Oil/Brine-Phase Behavior
- Soumyadeep Ghosh (Pennsylvania State University) | Russell T. Johns (Pennsylvania State University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- August 2016
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,106 - 1,125
- 2016.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- High Pressure, Enhanced Oil Recovery, HLD-NAC, Live Oil, Surfactant Oil Brine Phase Behavior
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 577 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Surfactant/polymer (SP) floods have significant potential to recover waterflood residual oil in shallow oil reservoirs. A thorough understanding of surfactant/oil/brine-phase behavior is critical to design SP-flood processes. Current practices involve repetitive laboratory experiments of dead crude at atmospheric pressure in a salinity scan that aims at finding an "optimum formulation" of chemicals for targeted oil reservoirs. Although considerable progress has been made in developing surfactants and polymers that increase the potential of a chemical enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) project, very little progress has been made to predict phase behavior as a function of formulation variables such as pressure, temperature, and oil equivalent alkane carbon number (EACN). The empirical Hand (1930) plot is still used today to model the microemulsion-phase behavior with little predictive capability because these and other formulation variables change. Such models could lead to incorrect recovery predictions and improper SP-flood designs.
In this research, we develop a new predictive-phase-behavior model and introduce a new factor ß to account for pressure changes in the HLD equation. This new HLD equation is coupled with the net-average-curvature (NAC) model to predict phase volumes, solubilization ratios, and microemulsion-phase transitions (Winsor II–, Winsor III, and Winsor II+). The predictions of key parameters are compared with experimental data and are within relative errors of 4% (average 2.35%) for measured optimum salinities and 17% (average 10.55%) for optimum solubilization ratios. This paper is the first to use the HLD/NAC model to predict microemulsion-phase behavior for live crudes, including optimal solubilization ratio and the salinity width of the three-phase Winsor III region at different temperatures and pressures. Although the effect of pressure variations on microemulsion-phase behavior is generally thought to be small compared with temperature-induced changes, we show here that this is not necessarily the case. The predictive approach relies on tuning the model to limited experimental data (such as at atmospheric pressure) similar to what is performed for equation-of-state (EOS) modeling of miscible gasfloods. This new EOS-like model could significantly aid the design of chemical floods where key variables change dynamically, and in screening of potential candidate reservoirs for chemical EOR.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||20|
Acosta, E. J. and Bhakta, A. S. 2009. The HLD-NAC Model for Mixtures of Ionic and Nonionic Surfactants. J. Surfactants Deterg. 12 (1): 7–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11743-008-1092-4.
Acosta, E., Szekeres, E., Sabatini, D. A. et al. 2003. Net-Average Curvature Model for Solubilization and Supersolubilization in Surfactant Microemulsions. Langmuir 19 (1): 186–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la026168a.
Acosta, E. J., Yuan, J. S. and Bhakta, A. S. 2008. The Characteristic Curvature of Ionic Surfactants. J. Surfactants Deterg. 11 (2): 145–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11743-008-1065-7.
Austad, T. and Staurland, G. 1990. Multiphase Behavior of Live Oil using a One-Component Surfactant: Effects of Temperature, Pressure and Salinity. In Situ 14 (4).
Austad, T. and Strand, S. 1996. Chemical Flooding of Oil Reservoirs 4. Effects of Temperature and Pressure on the Middle Phase Solubilization Parameters Close to Optimum Flood Conditions. Colloid. Surface. A 108 (2): 243–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0927-7757(95)03406-4.
Austad, T. and Taugbøl, K. 1995. Chemical Flooding of Oil Reservoirs 2. Dissociative Surfactant-Polymer Interaction with a Negative Effect on Oil Recovery. Colloid. Surface. A 103 (1): 73–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0927-7757(95)03232-3.
Austad, T., Hodne, H. and Staurland, G. 1990. Effects of Pressure, Temperature and Salinity on the Multiphase Behavior of the Surfactant/Methane and n-Decane/NaCl Brine System. In Surfactants and Macromolecules: Self-Assembly at Interfaces and in Bulk, ed. B. Lindman, J. B. Rosenholm, P. Stenius, 296–310. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Austad, T., Hodne, H., Strand, S. et al. 1996. Chemical Flooding of Oil Reservoirs 5. The Multiphase Behavior of Oil/Brine/Surfactant Systems in Relation to Changes in Pressure, Temperature, and Oil Composition. Colloid. Surface. A 108 (2): 253–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0927-7757(95)03405-6.
Barakat, Y., Fortney, L. N., LaLanne-Cassou, C. et al. 1983. The Phase Behavior of Simple Salt-Tolerant Sulfonates. SPE J. 23 (6): 913–918. SPE-10679-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10679-PA.
Barnes, J. R., Dirkzwager, H., Smit, J. et al. 2010. Application of Internal Olefin Sulfonates and Other Surfactants to EOR. Part 1: Structure - Performance Relationships for Selection at Different Reservoir Conditions. Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 24–28 April. SPE-129766-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/129766-MS.
Bourrel, M. and Schechter, R. S. 1988. Microemulsions and Related Systems: Formulation, Solvency, and Physical Properties. New York City: Marcel Dekker.
Buijse, M. A., Tandon, K., Jain, S. et al. 2012. Surfactant Optimization for EOR using Advanced Chemical Computational Methods. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 14–18 April. SPE-154212-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/154212-MS.
Cash, L., Cayias, J. L., Fournier, G. et al. 1977. The Application of Low Interfacial Tension Scaling Rules to Binary Hydrocarbon Mixtures. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 59 (1): 39–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(77)90336-8.
De Gennes, P. G. and Taupin, C. 1982. Microemulsions and the Flexibility of Oil/Water Interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 86 (13): 2294–2304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100210a011.
Graciaa, A., Fortrey, L. N., Schechter, R. S. et al. 1982. Criteria for Structuring Surfactants To Maximize Solubilization of Oil and Water: Part 1-Commercial Nonionics. SPE J. 22 (5): 743–749. SPE-9815-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/9815-PA.
Hammond, C. E. and Acosta, E. J. 2012. On the Characteristic Curvature of Alkyl-Polypropylene Oxide Sulfate Extended Surfactants. J. Surfactants Deterg. 15 (2): 157–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11743-011-1303-2.
Hand, D. B. 1930. Dineric Distribution. J. Phys. Chem. 34 (9): 1961–2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j150315a009.
Healy, R. N., Reed, R. L. and Stenmark, D. G. 1976. Multiphase Microemulsion Systems. SPE J. 16 (3): 147–160. SPE-5565-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5565-PA.
Huh, C. 1979. Interfacial Tensions and Solubilizing Ability of a Microemulsion Phase that Coexist with Oil and Brine. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 71 (2): 408–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(79)90249-2.
Jang, S. H., Arachchilage, G. A., Liyanage, P. J. et al. 2014. Microemulsion Phase Behavior Measurements Using Live Oils at High Temperature and Pressure. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 12–16 April. SPE-169169-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169169-MS.
Johns, R. T. and Ghosh, S. 2014. PennSurf Toolkit. Enhanced Oi Recovery Consortium at EMS Energy Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Karlström, G. and Lindman, B. 1992. Phase Behavior of Non-ionic Polymers and Surfactants of the Oxyethylene Type in Water and in Other Polar Solvents. In Organized Solutions: Surfactants in Science and Technology, ed. S.E. Friberg and B. Lindman, Chap. 5, 49–66. New York City: Marcel Dekker.
Márquez, N., Anton, R., Graciaa, A. et al. 1995. Partitioning of Ethoxylated Alkylphenol Surfactants in Microemulsion-Oil-Water Systems. Colloid. Surface. A 100 (25 July): 225–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0927-7757(95)03184-F.
Márquez, N., Graciaa, A., Lachaise, J. et al. 2002. Partitioning of Ethoxylated Alkylphenol Surfactants in Microemulsion_Oil_Water Systems: Influence of Physicochemical Formulation Variables. Langmuir 18 (16): 6021–6024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la020199o.
Nelson, R. 1983. The Effect of Live Crude on Phase Behavior and Oil-Recovery Efficiency of Surfactant Flooding Systems. SPE J. 23 (3): 501–510. SPE-10677-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10677-PA.
Nelson, R. C. and Pope, G. A. 1978. Phase Relationships in Chemical Flooding. SPE J. 18 (5): 325–338. SPE-6773-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6773-PA.
Puerto, M. C. and Reed, R. L. 1983. A Three-Parameter Representation of Surfactant/Oil/Brine Interaction. SPE J. 23 (4): 669–682. SPE-10678-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10678-PA.
Puerto, M., Hirasaki, G. J., Miller, C. A. et al. 2012. Surfactant Systems for EOR in High-Temperature, High-Salinity Environments. SPE J. 17 (1): 11–19. SPE-129675-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/129675-PA.
Queste, S., Salager, J. L., Strey, R. et al. 2007. The EACN Scale for Oil Classification Revisited Thanks to Fish Diagrams. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 312 (1): 98–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.004.
Robinson, D. B. and Peng, D. Y. 1978. The Characterization of the Heptanes and Heavier Fractions for the GPA Peng-Robinson Programs. Tulsa: Gas Processors Association.
Rosen, M. J. 2004. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, third edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Roshanfekr, M., Johns, R., Pope, G. et al. 2012. Simulation of the Effect of Pressure and Solution Gas on Oil Recovery From Surfactant/Polymer Floods. SPE J. 17 (3): 705–716. SPE-125095-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/125095-PA.
Roshanfekr, M., Johns, R. T., Pope, G. et al. 2013. Modeling of Pressure and Solution Gas for Chemical Floods. SPE J. 18 (3): 428–439. SPE-147473-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/147473-PA.
Salager, J.-L. 1988. Phase Transformation and Emulsion Inversion on the Basis of Catastrophe Theory. In Encyclopedia of Emulsion Technology: Basic Theory, Measurement, Applications, ed. P. Becher, 89–91. New York City: Marcel Dekker.
Salager, J.-L., Antón, R. E., Sabatini, D. A. et al. 2005. Enhancing Solubilization in Microemulsions—State of the Art and Current trends. J. Surfactants Deterg. 8 (1): 3–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11743-005-0328-4.
Salager, J.-L., Márquez, N., Graciaa, A. et al. 2000. Partitioning of Ethoxylated Octylphenol Surfactants in Microemulsion_Oil_Water Systems: Influence of Temperature and Relation between Partitioning Coefficient and Physicochemical Formulation. Langmuir 16 (13): 5534–5539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la9905517.
Salager, J.-L., Morgan, J. C., Schechter, R. S. et al. 1979. Optimum Formulation of Surfactant/Water/Oil Systems for Minimum Interfacial Tension or Phase Behavior. SPE J. 19 (2): 107–115. SPE-7054-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/7054-PA.
Sandersen, S. B., Stenby, E. H. and von Solms, N. 2012. The Effect of Pressure on the Phase Behavior of Surfactant Systems: An Experimental Study. Colloid. Surface. A 415 (5 December): 159–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.006.
Skauge, A. and Fotland, P. 1990. Effect of Pressure and Temperature on the Phase Behavior of Microemulsions. SPE Res Eval & Eng 5 (4): 601–608. SPE-14932-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14932-PA.
Southwick, J., Svec, Y., Chilek, G. et al. 2010. The Effect of Live Crude on Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Formulations: Implications for Final Formulation Design. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-135357-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/135357-MS.
Sun, L. M., Gao, G. Q., Wang, L. S. et al. 2012. Ultra-Low Interfacial Tension and Retention of Internal Olefin Sulfonate (IOS) for EOR. Adv. Mater. Res. 550–553: 36–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.550-553.36.
Tanford, C. 1980. The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes, second edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Trouillaud, A., Patacchini, L., de Loubens, R. et al. 2014. Simulation of Surfactant Flooding in the Presence of Dissolved and Free Gas Accounting for the Dynamic Effect of Pressure and Oil Composition on Microemulsion Phase Behavior. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 12–16 April. SPE-169148-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169148-MS.
Velásquez, J., Scorzza, C., Vejar, F. et al. 2010. Effect of Temperature and Other Variables on the Optimum Formulation of Anionic Extended Surfactant–Alkane–Brine Systems. J. Surfactants Deterg. 13 (1): 69–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11743-009-1142-6.
Winsor, P. A. 1948. Hydrotropy, Solubilization and Related Emulsification Processes. Trans. Faraday Soc. 44: 376–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/TF9484400376.