Semianalytical Modeling of Steam/Solvent Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil and Bitumen: Unsteady-State Model With Curved Interface
- Moosa Faradonbeh (University of Calgary) | Thomas G. Harding (Nexen Energy) | Jalal Abedi (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- February 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 134 - 148
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Numerical simulation, Mathematical modeling, SA-SAGD
- 42 in the last 30 days
- 138 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Coinjection of solvent with steam in steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) has shown promising results for enhancing oil rates as well as reducing energy and water consumption. Modeling and optimizing hybrid-steam/solvent-recovery processes by use of commercial numerical simulators can be very time-consuming. Semianalytical mathematical models may be used to estimate production rates and thermal efficiency in much less time.
In this study, an unsteady-state semianalytical model was developed to predict the oil-flow rate in the steam/solvent assisted-recovery process. The model assumes a curved interface with transient temperature and solvent distribution in the mobile zone. It also accounts for transverse dispersion and concentration dependent molecular diffusion for solvent distribution. The oil-flow rate and interface profile are predicted at each time in an iterative fashion. The model is validated against the CMG-STARS thermal simulator as well as experimental results for hexane-aided SAGD physical-model tests. The semianalytical model was able to predict oil-production rates by use of different solvents coinjected with steam, in agreement with reported experimental data.
The proposed model accounts for the complex interaction of heat and solvent solubility and diffusion as they affect mobilization and production of viscous oil. This model may be used to estimate the optimal operation parameters for the process over a range of different reservoir qualities and pressures, in a very time-efficient manner. The final outcome may lead to an efficient design of a steam/solvent-recovery process that uses less water and reduces the amount of energy and gas emissions per barrel of oil produced.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||15|
Allen, J. C. and Redford, D. A. 1978. Combination Solvent-Noncondensible Gas Injection Method for Recovering Petroleum from Viscous Petroleum-Containing Formations Including Tar Sand Deposits. US Patent No. 4,109,720.
Ayodele, O. R., Nasr, T. N., Beaulieu, G. et al. 2009. Laboratory Experimental Testing and Development of an Efficient Low Pressure ES-SAGD Process. J Can Pet Technol 48 (9): 54–61. PETSOC-09-09-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/09-09-54.
Azom, N. and Srinivasan, S. 2013. Modeling Coupled Heat Transfer and Multiphase Flow during the Expanding Solvent Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (ES-SAGD) Process. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166357-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/166357-MS.
Butler, R. M. 1985. A New Approach to the Modelling of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. J Can Pet Technol 24 (3): 42–51. PETSOC-85-03-01. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/85-03-01.
Butler, R. M. 1997. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. Calgary: GravDrain.
Butler, R. M. and Mokrys, I. J. 1989. Solvent Analogue Model of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. AOSTRA J. Res. 5 (1): 17–32.
Butler, R. M. and Mokrys, I. J. 1993. Recovery of Heavy Oils Using Vapourized Hydrocarbon Solvents: Further Development of The VAPEX Process. J Can Pet Technol 32 (6): 56–62. PETSOC-93-06-06. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93-06-06.
Butler, R. M. and Stephens, D. J. 1981. The Gravity Drainage of Steam-Heated Heavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells. J Can Pet Technol 20 (2): 90–96. PETSOC-81-02-07. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/81-02-07.
Butler, R. M., McNab, G. S. and Lo, H. Y. 1981. Theoretical Studies on the Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil during In Situ Steam Heating. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 59 (4): 455–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450590407.
Das, S. K. and Butler, R. M. 1995. Extraction of Heavy Oil and Bitumen Using Solvents at Reservoir Pressure. Presented at the Technical Meeting/Petroleum Conference of the South Saskatchewan Section, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, 16–18 October. PETSOC-95-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/95-118.
Das, S. K. and Butler, R. M. 1996. Diffusion Coefficients of Propane and Butane in Peace River Bitumen. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 74 (6): 985–992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450740623.
Das, S. K. and Butler, R. M. 1998. Mechanism of the Vapor Extraction Process for Heavy Oil and Bitumen. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 21 (1): 43–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(98)00002-3.
Dickson, J. L., Dittaro, L. M. and Boone, T. J. 2013. Integrating the Key Learnings from Laboratory, Simulation and Field Tests to Assess the Potential for Solvent Assisted – Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage. Presented at the SPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada, Calgary, 11–13 June. SPE-165485-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/165485-MS.
Dittaro, L. M., Jaafar, A. E., Perlau, D. L. et al. 2013. Findings from a Solvent-Assisted SAGD Pilot at Cold Lake. Presented at the SPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada, Calgary, 11–13 June. SPE-165434-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/165434-MS.
Dong, L. 2012. Effect of Vapour-Liquid Phase Behaviour of Steam-Light Hydrocarbon Systems on Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Process for Bitumen Recovery. Fuel 95 (May): 159–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.044.
Gupta, S. C. and Gittins, S. D. 2006. Christina Lake Solvent Aided Process Pilot. J Can Pet Technol 45 (9): 15–18. PETSOC-06-09-TN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/06-09-TN.
Gupta, S. C. and Gittins, S. D. 2012. An Investigation into Optimal Solvent Use and Nature of Vapor/Liquid Interface in Solvent-Aided SAGD Process with a Semi-Analytical Approach. SPE J. 17 (4): 1255–1264. SPE-146671-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/146671-PA.
Hosseininejad Mohebati, M., Maini, B. B. and Harding, T. G. 2012. Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Hexane on SAGD Performance at Different Operating Pressures. Presented at SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada, Calgary, 12–14 June. SPE-158498-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/158498-MS.
Jha, R., Kumar, M., Benson, I. et al. 2012. New Insights into Steam-Solvent Co-Injection Process Mechanism. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-159277-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/159277-MS.
Leaute, R. P. and Carey, B. S. 2007. Liquid Addition to Steam for Enhancing Recovery (LASER) of Bitumen with CSS: Results from the First Pilot Cycle. J Can Pet Technol 46 (9): 22–30. PETSOC-07-09-01. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/07-09-01.
Mehrotra, A. K. and Svrcek, W. Y. 1986. Viscosity of Compressed Athabasca Bitumen. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 64 (5): 844–847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450640520.
Nasr, T. N., Beaulieu, G., Golbeck, H. et al. 2002. Novel Expanding Solvent-SAGD Process “ES-SAGD.” Presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 11–13 June. PETSOC-2002-072-EA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2002-072-EA.
Nenniger, E. H. 1979. Hydrocarbon Recovery. Canadian Patent No. 1,059,432.
Peng, D. Y. and Robinson, D. B. 1976. A New Two-Constant Equation of State. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam 15: 59–64.
Rabiei Faradonbeh, M. 2013. Mathematical Modeling of Steam-Solvent Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil and Bitumen in Porous Media. PhD dissertation, University of Calgary, Calgary.
Rabiei Faradonbeh, M., Harding, T. G. and Abedi, J. 2012. Semi-Analytical Modeling of Steam-Solvent Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil and Bitumen, Part 1: Enhanced Flow Rate at Mobile Zone. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-170123-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/170123-MS.
Rabiei Faradonbeh, M., Harding, T. G., Abedi, J. et al. 2015. Stability Analysis of Coupled Heat and Mass Transfer Boundary Layers During Steam–Solvent Oil Recovery Process. Transport Porous Med. 108 (3): 595–615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-015-0490-0.
Redford, D. A. and Hanna, M. R. 1981. Gaseous and Solvent Additives for Steam Injection for Thermal Recovery of Bitumen from Tar Sands. US Patent No. 4,271,905.
Reid, R. C., Prausnitz, J. M. and Sherwood, T. K. 1977. The Properties of Gases and Liquids. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
Reis, J. C. 1992. A Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands: Linear Geometry. J Can Pet Technol 31 (10): 14–20. PETSOC-92-10-01. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/92-10-01.
Sharma, J. and Gates, I. D. 2010. Steam-Solvent Coupling at the Chamber Edge in an in Situ Bitumen Recovery Process. Presented at the SPE Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition, Mumbai, 20–22 January. SPE-128045-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/128045-MS.
Shu, W. R. 1984. A Viscosity Correlation for Mixtures of Heavy Oil, Bitumen, and Petroleum Fractions. SPE J. 24 (3): 277–282. SPE-11280-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/11280-PA.
Stone, H. L. 1970. Probability Model for Estimating Three-Phase Relative Permeability. J Pet Technol 22 (2): 214–218. SPE-2116-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2116-PA.
Yaws, C. L. 2003. Yaws Handbook of Thermodynamic and Physical Properties of Chemical Compounds. New York City: Knovel.