A Generalized Rheological Model for Drilling Fluids With Cubic Splines
- Binh Thanh Bui (Colorado School of Mines) | Azra Nur Tutuncu (Colorado School of Mines)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- March 2016
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 26 - 39
- 2015.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- numerical modeling, drilling fluids, rheological model, hydraulics, cubic splines
- 10 in the last 30 days
- 493 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
In drilling-fluid rheological characterization and hydraulics modeling, selecting a proper rheological model and obtaining rheological parameters with viscometers are critically important. Bingham plastic, power law, and yield power law are the most commonly used standard models for drilling-fluid rheology because they are mathematically simple to use. However, because of the complex nature of drilling fluids, these models do not often fit well to the rheological data. This leads to a significant error in drilling-fluid hydraulics modeling. While searching for models that are based on the physical interaction between the various components of the drilling fluid, it is very practical to find simple mathematical functions that best fit to any experimental data obtained from field viscometers. This will improve the accuracy of hydraulics modeling--in particular, for time-dependent drilling fluids. In this research, cubic splines were used to fit the experimental data obtained from field viscometers. A generalized hydraulics model is presented to calculate pressure drop in pipe and concentric annulus with detailed sample calculations. A numerical simulator was also developed to assist the calculations. The results obtained from the model were validated with experimental data to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model. One can implement the model introduced in this paper for any fluids. The main advantage of the model is that it can capture all the complex rheological response of the fluid. Hence, all readings obtained from the viscometers can provide valuable input for the hydraulic model. Also, the numerical solution is stable and straightforward to implement. The model provides drilling engineers a simple and powerful method to accurately predict the pressure distribution along the wellbore. This is highly important in drilling-fluid hydraulics-program optimization and well-control operation, especially in deepwater and Arctic environments.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Aadnoy, S. B. and Ravnoy, M. J. 1991. Improved Pressure Drop/Flow Rate Equation for Non-Newtonian Fluids in Laminar Flow. SPE-23474-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/23474-MS.
Bailey, W. J. and Weir, I. S. 1998. Investigation of Methods for Direct Rheological Model Parameter Estimation. J. Petrol. Sci. & Eng. 21 (1–2): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(98)00040-0.
Bailey, W. J. and Peden, J. M. 2000. A Generalized and Consistent Pressure Drop and Flow Regime Transition Model for Drilling Hydraulics. SPE Drill & Compl 15 (1): 44–56. SPE-62167-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/62167-PA.
Beirute, R. M. and Flumerfelt, R. W. 1977. An Evaluation of the Robertson-Stiff Model Describing Rheological Properties of Drilling Fluids and Cement Slurries. SPE J. 17 (2): 97–100. SPE-6505-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6505-PA.
Bingham, E. C. 1916. An Investigation of the Laws of Plastic Flow. Scientific Papers of Bureau of Standard 13, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Paper 278: 309–353.
Briscoe, B. J., Luckham, P. F., and Ren, S. R. 1996. The Properties of Drilling Muds at High Pressures and High Temperatures. Transaction Royal Society 348 (1687). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1994.0088.
Bui, B. 2012. Determination of Viscoelastic Properties of Drilling Fluids. MSc thesis, University of Tulsa, USA.
Campos, T. D., Steffe, F. J., and Ofoli, Y. R. 1994. Statistical Method to Evaluate the Critical Reynolds Number for Pseudoplastic Fluids in Tubes. J. Food Eng. 23 (1): 21–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0260-8774(94)90121-X.
Carreau, J. P. 1972. Rheological Equations From Molecular Network Theories. Trans., Society of Rheology 16 (1): 99–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1122/1.549276.
Casson, N. 1959. A Flow Equation for Pigment-Oil Suspensions of the Printing Ink Type. In Rheology of Disperse Systems, ed. C. C. Mill, 84–104. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Cross, M. M. 1965. Rheology of Non-Newtonian Fluids: A New Flow Equation for Pseudoplastic Systems. J. Colloid Science 20 (5): 417–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(65)90022-X.
Davison, J. M., Clary, S., Saasen, A. et al. 1999. Rheology of Various Drilling Fluid Systems Under Deepwater Drilling Conditions and the Importance of Accurate Predictions of Downhole Fluid Hydraulics. Presented at the 1999 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, USA, 3–6 October. SPE-56632-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/56632-MS.
de Waele, A. 1923. Viscometry and Plastometry. J. Oil and Colour Chemists Association 6 (38): 33–69.
Elise, A. 1995. An Improved Viscosity Equation to Characterize Shear-Thinning Fluids. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 14–17 February. SPE-28973-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28973-MS.
Eyring, H. 1936. Viscosity, Plasticity, and Diffusion as Examples of Absolute Reaction Rates. J. Chemical Physics 4: 283–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1749836.
Founargiotakis, K., Kelessidis, V. C., and Maglione, R. 2008. Laminar, Transitional, and Turbulent Flow of Herschel-Bulkley Fluids in Concentric Annulus. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 86: 676–683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20074.
Gahleitner, M., Bihlmayer, G., and Sobczak, R. 1991. Modified Carreau Model. Kunststoffe, German Plastics 81 (7): 651–654.
Graves, G. W. and Collins, E. R. 1978. A New Rheological Model for Non-Newtonian Fluids. SPE-7654-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/7654-MS.
Gucuyener, I. H. 1983. A Rheological Model for Drilling Fluids and Cement Slurries. Presented at the Middle East Oil Technology Conference and Exhibition, Bahrain, 14–17 March. SPE-11487-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/11487-MS.
Herschel, W. H. and Bulkley, R. 1926. Measurement of Consistency as Applied to Rubber Benzene Solutions. Proc., 29th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Testing Materials, Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA, 21–25 June. Vol. 26 (82), pp. 621–629.
Houwen, O. H. and Geehan, T. 1986. Rheology of Oil-Base Muds. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, USA, 5–8 October. SPE-15416-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15416-MS.
Hughes, T. L., Jones, T. G., and Houwen, O. H. 1993. Chemical Characterization of CMC and Its Relationship to Drilling-Mud Rheology and Fluid Loss. SPE Drill & Compl 8 (3): 157–164. SPE-20000-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20000-PA.
Kruger, C. J. C. 2002. Constrained Cubic-Spline Interpolation for Chemical Engineering Applications. http://www.korf.co.uk/spline.pdf (accessed June 2013).
Maglione, R., Robotti, G., and Romagnoli, R. 2000. In-situ Rheological Characterization of Drilling Mud. SPE J. 5 (4): 377–386. SPE-66285-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/66285-PA.
Melrose, J. C. and Lilienthal, W. B. 1951. Plastic Flow Properties of Drilling Fluids—Measurement and Application. J Pet Technol 3 (6): 159–164. SPE-951159-G-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/951159-G-PA.
Mezger, G. T. 2006. The Rheology Handbook: For Users of Rotational and Oscillatory Rheometers, second revision edition. Hannover, Germany: Vincentz Network GmBH & Co. KG.
Mitchell, R. and Miska, S. 2011. Fundamental of Drilling Engineering. SPE Textbook Series, Vol. 12. Richardson, Texas, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Nasiri, M. and Ashrafizadeh, S. N. 2010. Novel Equation for the Prediction of Rheological Parameters of Drilling Fluids in an Annulus. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (7): 3374–3385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie9009233.
Okafor, M. N. and Evers, J. F. 1992. Experimental Comparison of Rheology Models for Drilling Fluids. Presented at the Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, USA, 30 March–1 April. SPE 24086-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24086-MS.
Ostwald, W. 1925. Ueber die Geschwindigkeitsfunktion der Viskosität disperser Systeme. I. Kolloid-Zeitschrift 36 (2): 99–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01431449.
Pilehvari, A., Serth, R., and Lagad, V. 2001. General Hydraulics Calculation Method Using Rational Polynomial Model. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, USA, 30 September–3 October. SPE 71403-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71403-MS.
Prandtl, L. 1928. Ein Gedankenmodell zur kinetischen Theorie der festen Körper. ZAMM—J. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 8 (2): 85–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19280080202.
Reiner, M. 1930. In Search for a General Law of the Flow of Matter. J. Rheology 1: 250–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1122/1.2116315.
Robertson, R. E. and Stiff Jr., H. A. 1976. An Improved Mathematical Model for Relating Shear Stress to Shear Rate in Drilling Fluids and Cement Slurries. SPE J. 16 (1): 31–36. SPE-5333-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5333-PA.
Savins, J. G. 1958. Generalized Newtonian (Pseudoplastic) Flow in Stationary Pipes and Annuli. Petroleum Trans., AIME 213: 325–332. SPE-1151-G-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1151-G-PA.
Savins, J. G. 1962. The Characterization of Non-Newtonian Systems by a Dual Differentiation-Integration Method. SPE J. 2(2): 111–119. SPE-163-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/163-PA.
Sisko, A. W. 1958. The Flow of Lubricating Greases. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 50 (12): 1789–1792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie50588a042.
Snyder, H. W. and Castro, P. I. 2002. The Critical Reynolds Number for Rough-Wall Boundary Layers. J. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 90 (1): 41–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00114-3.
Steiner, E. H. 1958. A New Rheological Relationship to Express the Flow Properties of Melted Chocolate. International Chocolade Revue 13 (7): 290–295.
Trinh, K. T. 2011. On the Critical Reynolds Number for Transition From Laminar to Turbulent Flow. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1007/1007.2464.pdf (accessed April 2015).
Tutuncu, A. N. 1988. Rheological Evaluation of Invert Emulsion Muds Under Downhole Temperature and Pressure, MSc thesis. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Vipulanandan, C. and Mohammed, A. S. 2014. Hyperbolic Rheological Model With Shear Stress Limit for Acrylamide Polymer Modified Bentonite Drilling Muds. J. Petrol. Sci. & Eng. 122: 38–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.08.004.
Wang, Z. and Tang, S. 1982. Casson Rheological Model in Drilling Fluid Mechanics. Presented at the International Petroleum Exhibition and Technical Symposium, Beijing, 17–24 March. SPE-10564-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10564-MS.
Wang, G. and Fan, H. H. 2010. Utility Calculation Method of New Four-Parameter Rheological Model for Drilling Hydraulics. Presented at the SPS/SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing, 8–10 June. SPE 130421-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/130421-MS.
Weir, I. S. and Bailey, W. J. 1996. A Statistical Study of Rheological Models for Drilling Fluids. SPE J. 1 (4): 473–486. SPE-36359-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36359-PA.
Wilkinson, W. L. 1960. Non-Newtonian Fluids. New York: Pergamon Press.