- Boolean operators
- This OR that
This AND that
This NOT that
- Must include "This" and "That"
- This That
- Must not include "That"
- This -That
- "This" is optional
- This +That
- Exact phrase "This That"
- "This That"
- (this AND that) OR (that AND other)
- Specifying fields
- publisher:"Publisher Name"
author:(Smith OR Jones)
Human-Reliability Analysis for the Petroleum Industry: Lessons Learned from Applying SPAR-H
- Koen van de Merwe (DNV GL) | Sandra Hogenboom (DNV GL) | Martin Rasmussen (NTNU) | Karin Laumann (NTNU) | Kristian Gould (Statoil)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Economics & Management
- Publication Date
- October 2014
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 159 - 164
- 2014.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.3.3 Operational Safety, 2.3.2 Safety in Design and Engineering, 3.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty, and Risk Assessment, 3.2.4 Decision-Making Processes, 3.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 2.3 Safety, 3 Management and Information, 2.3.1 Human Factors, 2 Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Social Responsibility
- safety barrier management, human error, operational barriers, human reliability analysis, SPAR-H
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 235 since 2007
- Show more detail
Human error has proved to be a contributor to a number of major accidents in the petroleum industry. However, quantitative risk analysis (QRA) has only to a limited extent taken into account the contribution of human performance to major accident risk. Human-reliability analysis (HRA) has the potential to overcome this by systematically analyzing human performance for safety-critical tasks. A joint effort between industry and academia is under way in Norway to adapt SPAR-H [the standardized-plant-analysis-risk/HRA (SPAR-H) method], an HRA technique from the nuclear industry, to a petroleum setting (PetroHRA). This paper discusses some of the lessons learned so far in directly applying the technique to a petroleum case study. A case study was performed in which the operator's task was to manually activate the platform's depressurization system upon detection of a hydrocarbon leakage. The factors influencing the performance [performance-shaping factors (PSFs)] of the operator were analyzed, indicating the potential contributors to operator failure. The PSFs were time, stress/stressors, complexity, experience/training, procedures, human/machine interface (HMI)/ergonomics, fitness for duty, and work processes. Numerous issues were identified when directly applying SPAR-H. These were challenges in deciding on the multiplier of the PSFs, the potential for overlap between the PSFs, the industry specificity of the HMI/ergonomics PSF description, and the method's tendency to inflate human-error probabilities (HEPs). A first step to improve the definitions and guidance material for a petroleum-specific SPAR-H was taken in a separate literature study performed by two of the authors of this paper (Rasmussen et al., submitted 2013). It was further shown that it is possible and relatively straightforward to directly apply and integrate SPAR-H in QRA in a petroleum context. In addition, the qualitative outcomes provided a structured and meaningful understanding of human performance previously not available to QRA. Ultimately, this effort contributes to a further integration of HRA and QRA and therewith provides valuable insights about how to manage human performance associated with major-accident risk. With the frequency of major accidents and serious incidents not being significantly reduced, HRA can prove to be a valuable tool for improving process safety.
Boring, R.L. and Blackman, H. 2007. The Origins of the SPAR-H Method’s Performance Shaping Factor Multipliers. Proc., Joint 8th IEEE Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants and 13th Annual Workshop on Human Performance/Root Cause/Trending/Operating Experience/Self-Assessment. http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/3772068.pdf
Boring, R.L., Oxstrand, J., and Hildebrandt, M. 2009. Human Reliability Analysis for Control Room Upgrades. Proc., 53rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Antonio, Texas, 53, 1584–1588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/107118109X12524444080477.
Boring, R.L., Tran, T.Q., Gertman, D.L. et al. 2006. A Human Reliability Based Usability Evaluation Method for Safety-Critical Software. Presented at the Fifth International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Controls, and Human Machine Interface Technology, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 5, 1275–1279.
Burgherr, P.E. 2013. Bayesian Data Analysis of Severe Fatal Accident Risk in the Oil Chain. Risk Analysis 33 (1): 146–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01848.x.
Campbell, D.J. 1988. Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis. The Academy of Management Rev. 13: 40–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258353.
DNV. 2013. Enhancing offshore safety and environmental performance. Key levers to further reduce the risk of major offshore accidents. http://www.dnv.com/industry/oil_gas/offshore_safety_position_paper.asp.
Forester, J.A., Dang, V.N., Bye, A. et al. 2012. Conclusions on Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) Methods From the International HRA Empirical Study. ESREL 2012/International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference (PSAM), Helsinki, Finland, 11, 2913–2923.
Gell-Mann, M. 1995. What Is Complexity? Complexity 1 (1): 16–19.
Gertman, D., Blackman, H., Marble, J. et al. 2005. The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method (NUREG/CR-6883). Idaho National Laboratory, Battelle Energy Alliance, Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Gordon, R.P.E. 1998. The Contribution of Human Factors to Accident in the Offshore Oil Industry. Reliability Eng. & System Safety 61 (1): 95–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(98)80003-3.
Gould, K., Ringstad, A.J., and Van de Merwe, G.K. 2012. Human Reliability Analysis in Major Accident Risk Analyses in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry. Proc., 56th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, 2016–2020.
Hickling, E.M. and Bowie, J.E. 2013. Applicability of Human Reliability Assessment Methods to Human-Computer Interfaces. Cognition Technology and Work 15 (1): 19–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10111-012-0215-x.
Howitt, D. 2010. Introduction to Qualitative Methods in Psychology. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.
Kirwan, B. 1987. Human Reliability Analysis of an Offshore Emergency Blowdown System. Applied Ergonomics 18 (1): 23–33.
Laumann, K., Øien, K., Taylor, C. et al. 2014. Analysis of Human Actions As Barriers in Major Accidents in the Petroleum Industry, Applicability of Human Reliability Analysis Methods (Petro-HRA). Paper presented at the 2014 Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Lazzara, E., Pavlas, D., Fiore, S. et al. 2010. A Framework To Develop Task Complexity. Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting, 27 September–1 October, San Francisco, California, 54, 2338–2342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193121005402725.
Li, Y., Cho, J., and Ren, Y. 2014. How Can the Petroleum Industry Benefit From Human Reliability Analysis? Presented at the 2014 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Fort Worth, Texas, 4–6 March. SPE-167983-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/167983-MS.
Lloyd, S. 2001. Measures of Complexity: A Nonexhaustive List. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 21 (4): 7–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2001.939938.
Marsh and McLennan Companies. 2012. The 100 largest losses 1972–2011. Large property damage losses in the hydrocarbon industry, twenty-second edition. https://usa.marsh.com/Portals/9/Documents/100_Largest_Losses2011.pdf.
Meshkati, N. 2007. The Safety and Reliability of Complex Energy Systems. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2 (2): 141–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15567240500400838.
Øie, S., Hogenboom, S., van de Merwe, G.K. et al. 2014. Human Reliability Assessment of Blowdown in a Gas Leakage Scenario on Offshore Production Platforms: Methodological and Practical Experiences. Presented at the 2014 Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.
PSAN. 2004. Granskning av gassutblåsning på Snorre A, brønn 34/7-P31 A 28.11.2004. http://www.ptil.no/getfile.php/z%20Konvertert/Helse,%20milj%C3%B8%20og%20sikkerhet/Tilsyn/Dokumenter/snaendeligrapport_utennavnkomprimert.pdf
PSAN. 2014. RNNP: Risikonivå i norsk petroleumsvirksomhet, Sammendragsrapport. http://www.ptil.no/getfile.php/PDF/RNNP_2013/RNNP2013_sammendrag.pdf#nameddest=kapittel0102
Rasmussen, M., Standal, M.I., and Laumann, K. In press. Task Complexity as a Performance Shaping Factor: A Review and Recommendations in SPAR-H Adaption. J. of Risk Research (submitted November 15, 2013).
Skogdalen, J.E. and Vinnem, J.E. 2011. Quantitative Risk Analysis Offshore—Human and Organizational Factors. Reliability Eng. & System Safety 96 (4): 468–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.013.
Spurgin, A.J. 2009. Human Reliability Assessment: Theory and Practice, CRC Press, NW.
Statoil. 2010. Brønnhendelse på Gullfaks C http://www.statoil.com/en/NewsAndMedia/News/2010/Downloads/5Nov_2010_%20Rapport_broennhendelse_Gullfaks%20C.pdf
Whaley, A.M., Kelly, D.L., Boring, R.L. et al. 2011. SPAR-H Step-by-Step Guidance. Idaho National Laboratory Risk, Reliability, and NRC Programs Department Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Not finding what you're looking for? Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.
The SEG Wiki
The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.