Stimulated-Rock Characteristics and Behavior in Multistage Hydraulic-Fracturing Treatment
- Avi Lin (Halliburton) | Jianfu Ma (Halliburton)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- August 2015
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 784 - 789
- 2015.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- stimulated reservoir, SRV, Microseismics
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 477 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper presents a mathematical integration process through which all the important useful information and data related to stimulated rock are properly extracted and embedded so that the total effects of the hydraulic-fracturing stimulation are properly presented by the microseismic data detected and collected during the hydraulic-fracturing process. A multistage hydraulic-fracturing strategy is often used to help maximize the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV). The current analysis is based on chaining the stage results one-by-one. At each stage, the 3D SRV is constructed on the basis of its observed microseismic events with an enhanced convex-hull approach. This algorithm offers both a mathematical approximation of 3D volume and a 3D visualization of the SRV geophysical shape(s). More-detailed geometric characteristics are calculated further from the ellipsoid that best fits the constructed SRV, which relies on the acquired microseismic events. The characteristics include length, width, height, and orientation azimuth of the stimulated rock. Moreover, it forms the basis for calculating the overall SRV with the stage-by-stage approach.
In the advanced phase, this algorithm offers characteristics related to the interaction between multiple stages. The accurate 3D geophysical geometry of the overlapping volume between multiple stages is extracted and is calculated, and the percentage of overlapping volume over the SRV is estimated at each stage. These volume-overlapping quantities reveal the potential communication between these stages, indicating the efficiency of hydraulic-fracturing efforts and implying the loss of treatment fluid. This algorithm provides the field engineers with several useful aspects: an essential, reliable, and direct compound tool to dynamically visualize the stimulated reservoir geometry and treatment-field evolution; a real-time evaluation of the efficiency of a hydraulic-fracturing treatment; and parameters to help increase the production of a stimulated reservoir.
|File Size||659 KB||Number of Pages||6|
Agarwal, K., Mayerhofer, M.J., and Warpinski, N.R. 2012. Impact of Geomechanics on Microseismicity. Presented at the SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 20–22 March. SPE-152835-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/152835-MS.
Cheng, Y. 2012. Impacts of the Number of Perforation Clusters and Cluster Spacing on Production Performance of Horizontal Shale-Gas Wells. SPE Res Eval & Eng 15 (1): 31–40. SPE-138843-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/138843-PA.
Cipolla, C.L., Williams, M.J., Weng, X. et al. 2010. Hydraulic Fracture Monitoring to Reservoir Simulation: Maximizing Value. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-133877-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/133877-MS.
Craig D.P. 2010. Using Maps of Microseismic Events to Define Reservoir Discontinuities. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-135290-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/135290-MS.
Dasseault, M. and McLennan, J. 2011. Massive Multi-Stage Hydraulic Fracturing: Where are We? ARMA e-Newsletter, 45th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, California, USA, 26 June–29 June.
Ma, J. and Lin, A. 2013. Identifying Fracture Planes From Microseismic Data. US Patent No. 20,140,098,638.
Ma, J., Lin, A., and Walters, H.G. 2013. Identifying a Stimulated Reservoir Volume From Microseismic Data. US Patent 13,975,985.
Ma, J. and Williams, K. 2011. Systems and Methods for Hydraulic Fracture Characterization Using Microseismic Event Data. PCT WO2012141720A1.
Maxwell, S.C., Cho, D., Pope, T. et al. 2011. Enhanced Reservoir Characterization Using Hydraulic Fracture Microseismicity. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 24–26 January. SPE-140442-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140442-MS.
Mayerhofer, M.J., Lolon, E.P., Warpinski, N.R. et al. 2010. What Is Stimulated Reservoir? SPE Prod & Oper 25 (1): 89–98. SPE-119890-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119890-PA.
Warpinski, N.R. 2009. Microseismic Monitoring: Inside and Out. J Pet Technol 61 (11): 80–85. SPE-118537-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/118537-PA.
Zimmer, U. 2011. Calculating Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV) With Consideration of Uncertainties in Microseismic-Event Locations. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15–17 November. CSUG/SPE-148610-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/148610-MS.