Optimization of Integrated Template Structures for Arctic Subsea-Production Systems
- Evgeny A. Pribytkov (Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas and University of Stavanger) | Anatoly B. Zolotukhin (Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas and University of Stavanger) | Ove T. Gudmestad (University of Stavanger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Oil and Gas Facilities
- Publication Date
- August 2014
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 47 - 53
- 2014.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Integrated template structures, Marine operations, Subsea, Arctic , Subsea production sytems
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 310 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper analyzes the various selection methods of integrated template structures (ITSs) for use in the Arctic environment. First, an analysis of several actual projects is carried out, with the specific features of each described thoroughly. An important part of the work is devoted to the requirements of ITSs conceived in relevant NORSOK (Norsk Sokkels Konkuranseposisjon), International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and DNV (Det Norske Veritas) standards. The main elements of subsea production modules are examined in this work, along with their specific characteristics and components. Operation and installation of subsea modules in the Barents Sea are also analyzed in this paper. Four scenarios, with differing numbers of ITSs (two, three, four, and six) and differing quantities of well slots in each, are considered. For each scenario, a study of related marine operations (required for installation) is performed, and a program for installation-cost estimates is developed, resulting in the determination of an optimal design for the ITSs. Various parameters affecting the cost of subsea infrastructure are analyzed and studied from different perspectives (e.g., geometrical well-pattern systems, distance between drilling slots, drilling and construction costs). Risk analyses of the threats and consequences involved in the process are performed, and risk-assessment matrices and mitigation actions are established. As a result, a model for selecting an optimal ITS for the Arctic/Sub-Arctic region is created.
|File Size||618 KB||Number of Pages||7|
DNV-RP-H101, Risk Management in Marine and Subsea Operations. 2003. Høvik, Norway: Det Norske Veritas (DNV).
Gudmestad, O.T., Zolotukhin, A.B., Ermakov, A.I. et al. 1999. Basics of Offshore Petroleum Engineering and Development of Marine Facilities with Emphasis on the Arctic Offshore. Moscow: Neft' i Gaz.
Gudmestad, O.T. 2002. Risk Assessment Tools for Use During Fabrication of Offshore Structures and in Marine Operations Projects. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 124 (3): 153–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.1492825.
Grekov, S.V. and Kornienko, O.A. 2007. Optimal selection of subsea production structures lay-out (in Russian). Technical Report, Document no. ??? 622.276/.279.04, VNIIGAS, Moscow, http://www.ogbus.ru/authors/Grekov/Grekov_3.pdf.
IMCA SEL 019 - Guidelines for lifting operations. 2007. London: International Marine Contractors Association (IMCA).
INTECSEA WorleyParsons Group. 2014. Arctic and Cold Climate Capability & Experience, http://www.intecsea.com/images/Publications/CapabilityStatements/Arctic-Cold-Climate.pdf (accessed 2010).
ISO 19900:2002, Petroleum and natural gas industries -- General requirements for offshore structures. 2002. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
ISO 13628-1:2005, Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Design and operation of subsea production systems -- Part 1: General requirements and recommendations. 2005. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
ISO 13628-4:2010, Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Design and operation of subsea production systems -- Part 4: Subsea wellhead and tree equipment. 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
ISO 13628-7:2005, Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Design and operation of subsea production systems -- Part 7: Completion/workover riser systems. 2005. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
NORSOK N-001: Integrity of offshore structures, revision 8. 2012. Stavanger, Norway: Norwegian Oil Industry Association (OLF)/Federation of Norwegian Manufacturing Industries (TBL).
NORSOK N-004: Design of steel structures, revision 3. 2004. Stavanger, Norway: Norwegian Oil Industry Association (OLF)/Federation of Norwegian Manufacturing Industries (TBL).
NORSOK J-003: Marine operations, revision 2. 2003. Stavanger, Norway: Norwegian Oil Industry Association (OLF)/Federation of Norwegian Manufacturing Industries (TBL).
NORSOK R-CR-002: Lifting equipment, revision 1. 1995. Stavanger, Norway: Norwegian Oil Industry Association (OLF)/Federation of Norwegian Manufacturing Industries (TBL).
NORSOK U-001: Subsea production systems, revision 3. 2002. Stavanger, Norway: Norwegian Oil Industry Association (OLF)/Federation of Norwegian Manufacturing Industries (TBL).
Pavlov, D. 2011. Working at Shtokman Field: Challenges and solutions. Presentation at Intsok Seminar. http://intsok.com/style/downloads/DOF%20Su_PDF_021.%20DOF%20Subsea-Work.pdf
Titov, O. and Pedchenko, A. 2009. Modern state and trends in the Barents Sea ecosystem. Report, Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO), Murmansk, Russia.
Trbojevic, V., Gudmestad, O.T., and Rettedal, W.K. 2008. Risk Analysis for Offshore Installation, Modification and Removal Projects. Report, University of Stavanger and Statoil ASA, Stavanger, Norway.
Zakarian, E., Holm, H., Saha, P. et al. 2009. Shtokman: The Management of Flow Assurance Constraints in Remote Arctic Environment. Final Report Presented at the 24th World Gas Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5–9 October. Paper 00705.