Relative Permeability Characterization for Water-Alternating-Gas Injection in Oil Reservoirs
- Hamidreza Shahverdi (Heriot-Watt University and Isfahan University of Technology) | Mehran Sohrabi (Heriot-Watt University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2016
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 799 - 808
- 2016.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Water-Alternating-Gas, Three-Phase, Relative Permeability, WAG
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 553 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Large quantities of oil usually remain in oil reservoirs after conventional waterfloods. A significant part of this remaining oil can still be economically recovered by water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection. WAG injection involves drainage and imbibition processes taking place sequentially; therefore, the numerical simulation of the WAG process requires reliable knowledge of three-phase relative permeability (kr) accounting for cyclic-hysteresis effects.
In this study, the results of a series of unsteady-state two-phase displacements and WAG coreflood experiments were used to investigate the behavior of three-phase kr and hysteresis effects in the WAG process. The experiments were performed on two different cores with different characteristics and wettability conditions.
An in-house coreflood simulator was developed to obtain three-phase relative permeability values directly from unsteady-state WAG experiments by history matching the measured recovery and differential-pressure profiles. The results show that three-phase gas relative permeability is reduced in consecutive gas-injection cycles and consequently the gas mobility and injectivity drop significantly with successive gas injections during the WAG process, under different rock conditions. The trend of hysteresis in the relative permeabilty of gas (krg) partly contradicts the existing hysteresis models available in the literature. The three-phase water relative permeability (krw) of the water-wet (WW) core does not exhibit considerable hysteresis effect during different water injections, whereas the mixed-wet (MW) core shows slight cyclic hysteresis. This may indicate a slight increase of the water injectivity in the subsequent water injections in the WAG process under MW conditions. Insignificant hysteresis is observed in the oil relative permeability (kro) during different gas-injection cycles for both WW and MW rocks. However, a considerable cyclic-hysteresis effect in kro is observed during water-injection cycles of WAG, which is attributed to the reduction of the residual oil saturation (ROS) during successive water injections. The kro of the WW core exhibits much-more cyclic-hysteresis effect than that of the MW core. No models currently exist in reservoir simulators that can capture the observed cyclic-hysteresis effect in oil relative permeability for the WAG process.
Investigation of relative permeability data obtained from these displacement tests at different rock conditions revealed that there is a significant discrepancy between two-phase and three-phase relative permeability of all fluids. This highlights that not only the three-phase relative permeability of the intermediate phase (oil), but also the three-phase kr of the wetting phase (water) and nonwetting phase (gas) are functions of two independent saturations.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Baker, L. E. 1988. Three-Phase Relative Permeability Correlations. Presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 16–21 April. SPE-17369-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17369-MS.
Blunt, M. J. 2000. An Empirical Model for Three-Phase Relative Permeability. SPE J. 5 (4): 435–445. SPE-67950-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/67950-PA.
Carlson, F. M. 1981. Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis to the Nonwetting Phase. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 4–7 October. SPE-10157-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10157-MS.
Dietrich, J. K. and Bondor, P. L. 1976. Three-Phase Oil Relative Permeability Models. Presented at the SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 3–6 October. SPE-6044-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6044-MS.
Egermann, P., Vizika, O., Dallet, L. et al. 2000. Hysteresis in Three-Phase Flow: Experiments, Modeling and Reservoir Simulations. Presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference. Paris, 24–25 October. SPE-65127-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/65127-MS.
Element, D. J., Masters, J. H. K., Sargent, N. C. et al. 2003. Assessment of Three-Phase Relative Permeability Models Using Laboratory Hysteresis Data. Presented at the SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Kuala Lumpur, 20–21 October. SPE-84903-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84903-MS.
Eleri, O., Graue, A., Skauge, A. et al. 1995. Calculation of Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities From Displacement Experiments With Measurements of In-Situ Saturation. Oral presentation of paper 9509 given at the 1995 Society of Core Analysts Conference Paper, San Francisco, 12–14 September.
Fatemi, S. M., Sohrabi, M., Jamiolahmady, M. et al. 2011. Experimental Investigation of Near-Miscible Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) Injection Performance in Water-Wet and Mixed-Wet Systems. Presented at Offshore Europe, Aberdeen, 6–8 September. SPE-145191-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/145191-MS.
Hustad, O. S. and Hansen, A. G. 1995. A Consistent Correlation For Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities and Phase Pressure Based on Three Sets of Two Phase Data. Oral presentation given at the 8th European Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Vienna, Austria, 15–17 May.
Killough, J. E. 1976. Reservoir Simulation With History-Dependent Saturation Functions. SPE J. 16 (1): 37–48. SPE-5106-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5106-PA.
Land, C. S. 1968. Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow From Rock Properties. SPE J. 8 (2): 149–156. SPE-1942-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1942-PA.
Larsen, J. A. and Skauge, A. 1998. Methodology for Numerical Simulation With Cycle-Dependent Relative Permeabilities. SPE J. 3 (2): 163–173. SPE-38456-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38456-PA.
Naar, J. and Wygal, R. J. 1961. Three-Phase Imbibition Relative Permeability. SPE J. 1 (4): 254–258. SPE-90-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/90-PA.
Oak, M. J. 1990. Three-Phase Relative Permeability of Water-Wet Berea. Presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 22–25 April. SPE-20183-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20183-MS.
Parrish, D. R. 1966. Flooding Process for Recovery of Oil. US Patent No. 3,244,228.
Shahverdi, H. 2012. Characterization of Three-Phase Flow and WAG Injection in Oil Reservoirs. Department of Petroleum Engineering. PhD dissertation, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK (February 2012).
Shahverdi, H. and Sohrabi, M. 2013. An Improved Three-Phase Relative Permeability and Hysteresis Model for the Simulation of a Water-Alternating-Gas Injection. SPE J. 18 (5): 841–850. SPE-152218-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/152218-PA.
Shahverdi, H. and Sohrabi, M. 2014. Modeling of Cyclic Hysteresis of Three-Phase Relative Permeability During Water-Alternating-Gas Injection. SPE J. 20 (1): 35–48. SPE-166526-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/166526-PA.
Shahverdi, H., Jamiolahmady, M., Sohrabi, M. et al. 2011a. Evaluation of Three-Phase Relative Permeability Models for WAG Injection Using Water-Wet and Mixed-Wet Core Flood Experiments. Presented at the SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 23–26 May. SPE-143030-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143030-MS.
Shahverdi, H., Sohrabi, M., Fatemi, M. et al. 2011b. Three-Phase Relative Permeability and Hysteresis Effect During WAG Process in Mixed Wet and Low IFT Systems. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 78 (34): 732–739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2011.08.010.
Shahverdi, H., Sohrabi, M. and Jamiolahmady, M. 2011c. A New Algorithm for Estimating Three-Phase Relative Permeability from
Unsteady-State Core Experiments. Transport Porous Med. 90 (3): 911–926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-011-9823-9.
Skauge, A. and Larsen, J. A. 1994. Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities and Trapped Gas Measurements Related to WAG Processes. Oral presentation given at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Stavanger, Norway, 12–14 September.
Sohrabi, M., Danesh, A. and Jamiolahmady, M. 2008. Visualisation of Residual Oil Recovery by Near-Miscible Gas and SWAG Injection Using High-Pressure Micromodels. Transport Porous Med. 74 (2): 239–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-007-9193-5.
Sohrabi, M., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D. H. et al. 2008. Microscopic Mechanisms of Oil Recovery By Near-Miscible Gas Injection. Transport Porous Med. 72 (3): 351–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-007-9154-z.
Sohrabi, M., Tehrani, D. and Al-Abri, M. 2007. Performance of Near-Miscible Gas and SWAG Injection in a Mixed-Wet Core. Oral presentation given at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Calgary, 10–13 September.
Spiteri, E. J. 2005. Relative Permeability Hysteresis: A New Model and Impact On Reservoir Simulation. Master’s thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Spiteri, E. J. and Juanes, R. 2004. Impact of Relative Permeability Hysteresis on the Numerical Simulation of WAG Injection. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26–29 September. SPE-89921-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89921-MS.
Stone, H. L. 1970. Probability Model for Estimating Three-Phase Relative Permeability. J Pet Technol 22 (2): 214–218. SPE-2116-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2116-PA.
Stone, H. L. 1973. Estimation of Three-Phase Relative Permeability And Residual Oil Data. J Can Pet Technol 12 (4). PETSOC-73-04-06. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/73-04-06.