Effect of Concentration on HPAM Retention in Porous Media
- Guoyin Zhang (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Center) | Randall Seright (New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Center)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2014
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 373 - 380
- 2014.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex)
- Polymer flooding, Chemical flooding, Polymer retention
- 8 in the last 30 days
- 811 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
This paper investigates the effect of hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) polymer concentration on retention in porous media by use of both static and dynamic measurements. Consistent results by use of these two methods show that different polymer-retention behaviors exist in dilute, semidilute, and concentrated regions. In both the dilute and concentrated regions, polymer retention has little dependence on concentration. In contrast, in the semidilute region, polymer retention is concentration dependent. If a porous medium is first contacted sufficiently with dilute polymer solution to satisfy the retention, no significant additional retention occurs during exposure to higher HPAM concentrations. On the basis of the experimental results, a concentration-related retention mechanism is proposed that considers the orientation of the adsorbed polymer molecules and the interaction between molecular coils in solution. By use of this model, we explain why polymer retention does not show much dependence on concentration in the dilute and concentrated regimes. Further, in the semidilute region, we explain how moderate coil interactions lead to mixed adsorbed-polymer orientation and magnitude on rock surfaces, and retention becomes concentration dependent. In field applications of polymer and chemical floods, reduced polymer retention may be achieved by first injecting a low-concentration polymer bank.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||8|
API. 1990. API RP 63 Recommended Practices for Evaluation of Polymers Used in Enhanced Oil Recovery Operations. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C. (June 1990).
Aubert, J. H. and Tirrell M. 1980. Flows of Dilute Polymer Solutions through Packed Porous Chromatographic Columns. Rheol. Acta 19 (4): 452–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01524018.
Broseta, D. Medjahed, F., Lecourtier, J., et al. 1995. Polymer Adsorption/Retention in Porous Media: Effects of Core Wettability and Residual Oil. SPE Advanced Technology Series 3 (1): 103–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24149-PA.
Camilleri, D., Engelsen, S., Lake, L. W., et al. 1987. Description of an Improved Compositional Micellar/Polymer Simulator. SPE Res Eng 2 (4): 427–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13967-PA.
Castagno, R. E., Shupe, R. D., Gregory, M. D., et al. 1987. Method for Laboratory and Field Evaluation of a Proposed Polymer Flood. SPE Res Eng 2 (4): 452–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13124-PA.
Dang, C. T. Q., Chen, Z., Nguyen, N. T. B., et al. 2011. Development of Isotherm Polymer/Surfactant Adsorption Models in Chemical Flooding. Paper SPE 147872 presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, 20–22 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/147872-MS.
Dawson, R., and Lantz, R. B. 1972. Inaccessible Pore Volume in Polymer Flooding. SPE J. 24 (5): 448–452. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3522-PA.
de Gennes, P. G. 1979. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Deng, Y., Dixon, J. B. and White, G. N. 2006. Adsorption of Polyacrylamide on Smectite, Illite, and Kaolinite. Soil Sci. Soc. AM. J. 70 (1): 297–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0200.
Dominguez, J. G. and Willhite, G. P. 1977. Retention and Flow Characteristics of Polymer Solutions in Porous Media. SPE J. 17 (2): 111–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5835-PA.
Espinasse, P., and Siffert, B. 1979. Acetamide and Polyacrylamide Adsorption onto Clays: Influence of the Exchangeable Cations and the Salinity of the Medium. Clay. Clay. Miner. 27 (4): 279–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1979.0270406.
Ferry, J. D. 1948. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymer Solutions. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 41 (1): 53–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01974775.
Gogarty, W. B. 1967. Mobility Control with Polymer Solutions. SPE J. 7 (2): 161–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1566-PA.
Green, D. W., and Willhite, G. P. 1998. Enhanced Oil Recovery, Vol. 6, 107–110. Richardson, Texas: Textbook Series, SPE.
Gupta, S. P. 1978. Micellar Flooding: The Propagation of the Polymer Buffer Bank. SPE J. 18 (1): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6204-PA.
Hirasaki, G. J., and Pope, G. A. 1974. Analysis of Factors Influencing Mobility and Adsorption in the Flow of Polymer Solution through Porous Media. SPE J. 14 (4): 337–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4026-PA.
Huang, Y., and Sobie, K. S. 1993. Scleroglucan Behavior in Flow through Porous Media: Comparison of Adsorption and In-Situ Rheology with Xanthan. Paper SPE 25173 presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2–5 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25173-MS.
Hughes, D. S., Teeuw D., Cottrell, C. W., et al. 1990. Appraisal of the Use of Polymer Injection to Suppress Aquifer Influx and to Improve Volumetric Sweep in a viscous Oil Reservoir. SPE Res Eng 5 (1): 33–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17400-PA.
Huh, C., Lange, E. A., and Cannella, W. J. 1990. Polymer Retention in Porous Media. Paper SPE 20235 presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 22–25 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20235-MS.
Jennings, R. R., Rogers, J. H. and West, T. J. 1971. Factors Influencing Mobility Control by Polymer Solutions. J. Pet. Tech. 23 (3): 391–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2867-PA.
Lotsch, T., Muller, T., and Pusch, G. 1985. The Effect of Inaccessible Pore Volume on Polymer Core Experiments. Paper SPE 13590 presented at the SPE Oilfield and Geothermal Chemistry Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, 9–11 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13590-MS.
Marker, J. M. 1973. Dependence of Polymer Retention on Flow Rate. J. Pet. Tech. 25 (11): 1307–1308. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4423-PA.
Mezzomo, R. F., Moczydlower, P., Sanmartin, A. N., et al. 2002. A New Approach to the Determination of Polymer Concentration in Reservoir Rock Adsorption Tests. Paper SPE 75204 presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 13–17 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/75204-MS.
Mungan, N. 1969. Rheology and Adsorption of Aqueous Polymer Solutions. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 8 (2): 45–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/69-02-01.
Osterloh, W. T. and Law, E. J. 1998. Polymer Transport and Rheological Properties for Polymer Flooding in the North Sea Captain Field. Paper SPE 39694 presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 19–22 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39694-MS.
Peterson, C. and Kwei, T. K. 1961. The Kinetics of Polymer Adsorption onto Solid Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 65 (8): 1330–1333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100826a013.
Ranjbar, M., Rupp, J. and Pusch, G. 1991. Influence of Pore Radi Distribution on Polymer Retention in Natural Sandstones. Oral presentation given at 6th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Stavanger, Norway, 21–23 May.
Satter, A., Shum, Y. M., Adams, W. T., et al. 1980. Chemical Transport in Porous Media with Dispersion and Rate-controlled Adsorption. SPE J. 20 (3): 99–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6847-PA.
Seright, R. S. 1993. Effect of Rock Permeability on Gel Performance in Fluid-Diversion Applications. In Situ. 17 (4): 363–386.
Seright, R. S., Fan, T., Wavrik, K., et al. 2011. New Insights into Polymer Rheology in Porous Media. SPE J. 16 (1): 35–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/129200-PA.
Seright, R. S., Seheult, M., and Talashek T. 2009. Injectivity Characteristics of EOR Polymers. SPE Res Eval & Eng 12 (5): 783–792. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/115142-PA.
Shah, B. N., Willhite, G. P., and Green, D. W. 1978. The Effect of Inaccessible Pore Volume on the Flow of Polymer and Solvent through Porous Media. Paper SPE 7586 presented at the SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition , Houston, Texas, 1–3 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/7586-MS.
Szabo, M. T. 1979. An Evaluation of Water-Soluble Polymers for Secondary Oil Recovery – Part 2. J. Pet. Tech. 31 (5): 561–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6601-PA.
Szabo, M. T. 1975. Some Aspects of Polymer Retention in Porous Media Using a C14-Tagged Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide. SPE J. 15 (4): 323–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4668-PA.
Vela, S., Peaceman, D. W., and Sandvik, E. I. 1976. Evaluation of Polymer Flooding in a Layered Reservoir with Crossflow, Retention, and Degradation. SPE J. 16 (2): 82–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5102-PA.
Vossoughi, S., Smith, J. E., Green, D. W., et al. 1984. A New Method to Simulate the Effects of Viscous Fingering on Miscible Displacement Processes in Porous Media. SPE J 24 (1): 56–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10970-PA.
Ying, Q., and Chu, B. 1987. Overlap Concentration of Macromolecules in Solution. Macromolecules 20 (2): 362–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma00168a023.
Yuan, C., Delshad, M., and Wheeler, M. F. 2010. Parallel Simulations of Commercial-Scale Polymer Floods. Paper SPE 123441 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anaheim, California, 27–29 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/132441-MS.
Zaitoun, A. and Kohler, N. 1987. The Role of Adsorption in Polymer Propagation through Reservoir Rocks. Paper SPE 16274 presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, San Antonio, Texas, 4–6 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16274-MS.
Zheng, C. G., Gall, B. L., Gao, H. W., et al. 1998. Effects of Polymer Adsorption and Flow Behavior on Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media. Paper SPE 39632 presented at SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 19–22 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39632-MS.