In-Situ Poisson’s Ratio Determination From Interference Transient Well Test
- Mojtaba P. Shahri (University of Tulsa) | Stefan Z. Miska (University of Tulsa)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- October 2015
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,041 - 1,052
- 2015.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Diffusivity Equation , Interference Transient Well Test, Poisson’s Ratio, Geomechanics
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 354 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Poisson's ratio is usually determined with well logging, fracturing data, and core samples. However, these methods provide us with a Poisson's ratio that is representative of only near-wellbore regions. In this paper, a technique is proposed by extending currently used pressure-transient-testing concepts to include reservoir stresses. More specifically, the interference well test is generalized to find not only conventional flow parameters such as reservoir transmissivity and storage capacity, but also the average in-situ Poisson's ratio. This is accomplished with the generalized diffusivity equation, which takes into account flow-induced stress changes.
First, a generalized diffusivity equation is formulated by considering a deformable porous medium. The main goal of the generalized diffusivity equation is to extend current well-testing methods to include both fluid-flow and rock-mechanics aspects, and to present a way to determine the rock-mechanics-related property, Poisson's ratio, from the interference-well test. The line-source solution to the diffusivity equation is used to modify the current interference well-test technique. A synthetic example is presented to show the main steps of the proposed transient well-testing analysis technique. In addition, application of the proposed method is illustrated with interference-well-test field data. With a Monte Carlo simulation, effects of uncertainty in the input data on the prediction of Poisson's ratio are investigated, as well. In addition, a coupled fluid-flow/geomechanical simulation is performed to show the validity of the proposed formulation and corresponding improvement over the current analytical approach.
One can put in practice an average in-situ value in different applications requiring accurate value of Poisson's ratio on the reservoir scale. Some examples of these include in-situ-stress-field determination, stress distribution and rock-mass deformation, and the next generation of coupled fluid-flow/geomechanical simulators. By use of Poisson's ratio that could capture flow-induced stress changes, we would be able to find the stress distribution caused by production/injection within the reservoir more precisely as well.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Alpak, F. O. 2014. Robust Fully-Coupled Multiphase Flow and Geomechanics Simulation. Presented at the SPE Large-Scale Computing and Big Data Challenges in Reservoir Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Istanbul, Turkey, 15–17 September. SPE-172991-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/172991-MS.
Alvarez, L. L., Alzate, G. A., and Naranjo, A. 2014. Geomechanics Coupled Fluid Flow in Heavy Oil Reservoirs Considering Cold Production. Presented at the SPE Heavy and Extra Heavy Oil Conference: Latin America, Medellín, Colombia, 24–26 September. SPE-171132-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/171132-MS.
Baldwin Jr., D. E. 1969. A Monte Carlo Model for Pressure Transient Analysis. Presented at the Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Denver, USA, 28 September–1 October. SPE-2568-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2568-MS.
Berryman, J. G. 1992. Effective Stress for Transport Properties of Inhomogeneous Porous Rock. J. Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 97 (B12): 17409–17424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/92JB01593.
Biot, M. A. 1941. General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation. J. Applied Science 12 (2): 155–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886.
Biot, M. A. and Willis, D. G. 1957. The Elastic Coefficients of the Theory of Consolidation. J. Applied Mechanics 24: 594–601.
Carroll, M. M. 1980. Mechanical Response of Fluid-Saturated Porous Materials. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 251–262.
Chen, H.-Y. and Teufel, L. W. 2001. Reservoir Stress Changes Induced by Production/Injection. Paper presented at the Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 21–23 May. SPE-71087-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71087-MS.
Dean, R. H., Gai, X., Stone, C. M. et al. 2006. A Comparison of Techniques for Coupling Porous Flow and Geomechanics. SPE J. 11 (1): 132–140. SPE-79709-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/79709-PA.
Deng, H., Chen, Z., Dong, C. et al. 2013. Compositional Simulation of Condensate Banking Coupled With Reservoir Geomechanics. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, USA, 12–14 August. SPE-168671-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/168671-MS.
Detournay, E. and Cheng, A. H.-D. 1988. Poroelastic Response of a Borehole in a Non-hydrostatic Stress Field. International J. Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstract 25 (3): 171–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(88)92299-1.
Detournay, E. and Cheng, A. H-D. 1993. Fundamentals of Poroelasticity. In Comprehensive Rock Engineering Principle, Practice, and Projects, ed. C. Fairhurst, Vol. 2, 113–171. New York: Pergamon.
Evans, M., Hastings, N., and Peacock, B. 2000. Statistical Distributions, third edition, 187–188.
New York: Wiley.
Garagash, I. A., Dubovskaya, A. V., Korneva, D. A. et al. 2014. Coupled Geomechanical and Fluid Flow Simulation of the Oil Field Evolution Induced by Reservoir Production. Presented at the SPE Russian Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Technical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, 14–16 October. SPE-171215-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/171215-MS.
Hart, D. J. and Wang, H. F. 1995. Laboratory Measurements of a Complete Set of Poroelastic Moduli for Berea Sandstone and Indiana Limestone. J.Geophysical Research 100 (B9): 17741–17751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JB01242.
Holt, R. M., Flornes, O., Li, L. et al. 2004. Consequences of Depletion-Induced Stress Changes on Reservoir Compaction and Recovery. Presented at the 6th North America Rock Mechanics Symposium (NARMS), Houston, USA, 5–9 June.
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. 2012. FLAC3D—Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in Three Dimensions, User-Manual, Ver. 5.0. Minneapolis, USA.
Minkoff, S. E., Stone, C. K., Bryant, S. et al. 2003. Coupled Fluid Flow and Geomechanical Deformation Modeling. J. Petrol. Sci. & Eng. 38 (1–2): 37– 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00021-4.
Morillo, A., Moreno, J., Quintero, R. et al. 2014. Development of a Finite Element Computer Simulation Platform for a Coupled Reservoir and Geomechanics System. Presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Maracaibo, Venezuela, 21–23 May. SPE-169431-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169431-MS.
Pan, F., Sepehrnoori, K., and Chin, L. Y. 2007. Development of a Coupled Geomechanics Model for a Parallel Compositional Reservoir Simulator. Presented at the Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11–14 November. SPE-109867-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/109867-MS.
Pan, F., Sepehrnoori, K., and Chin, L. Y. 2009. A New Solution Procedure for a Fully Coupled Geomechanics and Compositional Reservoir Simulator. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2–4 February. SPE-119029-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119029-MS.
Paslay, P. R. 1963. Rock Stresses Induced by Flow of Fluids Into Boreholes. SPE J. 3 (1): 85–94. SPE-482-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/482-PA.
Rudnicki, J. W. 1986. Fluid Mass Sources and Point Forces in Linear Elastic Diffusive Solids. Mechanics of Material 5: 383–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(86)90042-6.
Seth, M. S. and Gray, K. E. 1968a. Transient Stresses and Displacement Around a Wellbore Due to Fluid Flow in Transversely Isotropic, Porous Media: I. Infinite Reservoirs. SPE J. 8 (1): 63–78. SPE-1538-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1538-PA.
Seth, M. S. and Gray, K. E. 1968b. Transient Stresses and Displacement Around a Wellbore Due to Fluid Flow in Transversely Isotropic, Porous Media: II. Finite Reservoirs. SPE J. 8 (1): 79–86. SPE-1722-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1722-PA.
Shahri, M. P. and Miska, S. 2013. Spatio-Temporal Stress Path Prediction Using a Fluid Flow-Geomechanical Modeling. Presented at the Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, USA, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166081-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/166081-MS.
Theis, C. V. 1935. The Relation Between the Lowering of the Piezometric Surface and the Rate and Duration of Discharge of a Well Using Ground Water Storage. Trans., American Geophysical Union 16 (2): 519–524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/TR016i002p00519.
Thompson, L. G., Reynolds, A. C., and Oliver, D. 2007. Pressure Transient Analysis, Lecture/Class, University of Tulsa, Oklahoma (unpublished).
Tran, D., Settari, A., and Nghiem, L. 2004. New Iterative Coupling Between a Reservoir Simulator and a Geomechanics Module. SPE J. 9 (3): 362–369. SPE-78192-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/78192-PA.
Udegbunam, J. E., Aadnoy, B. S., and Fjelde, K. K. 2013. Uncertainty Evaluation of Wellbore Stability Model Predictions. Presented at the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, 7–9 October. SPE-166788-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/166788-MS.
Wang, H. F. 2000. Theory of Linear Poroelasticity With Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrology, Princeton University Press.
Williamson, H. S., Sawaryn, S. J., and Morrison, J. W. 2006. Monte Carlo Techniques Applied to Well Forecasting: Some Pitfalls. SPE Drill & Compl 21 (3): 216–227. SPE-89984-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89984-PA.