Application of Analytical Proxy Models in Reservoir Estimation for SAGD Process: UTF-Project Case Study
- Ali Azad (University of Alberta) | Richard Chalaturnyk (University of Alberta)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- May 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 219 - 232
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 5.5.8 History Matching
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 568 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) has been used successfully for the last 25 years in Canada. SAGD is a thermal recovery process that was invented to extract highly viscous bitumen from deep Canadian oil-sands reservoirs. To date, the original idea of SAGD has not changed greatly since the first pilot test in 1987. However, field operation and reservoir management have been influenced by recent developments in technology. Advanced drilling techniques, automated production control, and real-time data monitoring are gradually transforming the SAGD process into smart fields. As such, improving current history-matching techniques would support fast decision-making requirements significantly in closed-loop reservoir management. This paper recommends analytical solutions for simulations with medium-to-high levels of uncertainty. This shows how an analytical simulator can be improved effectively to mimic the essential features of a SAGD field for fast history matching. Combined with the analytical model recently proposed by the authors, this paper investigates the methodology to apply uncomplicated analytical/mathematical solutions to practical cases. The two underground test-facility (UTF) pilot-test case studies covered in this paper provide a better understanding of the proposed methodology. History matching results show that the current analytical models are suitable to act as proxy models for optimization purposes.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Awasthi, A., Sankaran, S., Nikolaou, M. et al. 2007. Closingthe Gap Between Reservoir Modeling and Production Optimization. Presented atthe Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 11-12 April.SPE-107463-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/107463-MS.
Azad, A. and Chalaturnyk, R.J. 2011. Numerical study of SAGD:geomechanical-flow coupling for Athabasca oil sand reservoirs. Presented at the45th US Rock Mechanics /Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, 26-29 June.
Azad, A. and Chalaturnyk, R.J. 2012. An improved SAGDanalytical simulator: Circular steam chamber geometry. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 82-83 (0): 27-37. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.01.003.
Azad, A. and Chalaturnyk, R.J. 2010. A Mathematical Improvementto SAGD Using Geomechanical Modelling. J Can Pet Technol 49(10): 53-64. SPE-141303-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/141303-PA.
Butler, R.M. and Stephens, D.J. 1981. The Gravity Drainage ofSteam-Heated Heavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells. J Can Pet Technol 20 (2): 90-96. JCPT Paper No. 81-02-07. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/81-02-07.
Butler, R.M. 1997. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen.Calgary, Alberta: GravDrain Inc.
Butler, R.M., McNab, G.S., and Lo, H.Y. 1981. Theoreticalstudies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during in-situ steam heating.The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 59 (4):455-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450590407.
Chalaturnyk, R.J. 1996. Geomechanics of Steam-AssistedGravity Drainage in Heavy Oil Reservoirs. PhD thesis, Department of Civiland Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Cokar, M., Kallos, M.S., and Gates, I.D. 2011. A NewThermogeomechanical Theory for Gravity Drainage in SAGD. Proc., WorldHeavy Oil Congress 2011, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 14-17 March, Vol. 2,717-722.
Collins, P.M. 1994. Design of the Monitoring Program ForAOSTRA's Underground Test Facility, Phase B Pilot. J Can Pet Technol 33 (3): 46-53. PETSOC-94-03-06. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94-03-06.
Edmunds, N.R., Kovalsky, J.A., Gittins, S.D. et al. 1994.Review of Phase A Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage Test. SPE Res Eng 9 (2): 119-214. SPE-21529-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/21529-PA.
Fetel, E. and Caumon, G. 2008. Reservoir flow uncertaintyassessment using response surface constrained by secondary information. J.Pet. Sci. Eng. 60 (3-4): 170-182. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2007.06.003.
Ito, Y., Suzuki, S., and Yamada, H. 1998. Effect ofReservoir Parameters on Oil Rates and Steam Oil Ratios in SAGD Projects.Presented at the 7th UNITAR International Conference on Heavy Crude and TarSands, Beijing, China, 27-31 October. [author added]
Komery, D.P., Luhning, R.W., Pearce, J.V. et al. 1998. PilotTesting of Post-Steam Bitumen Recovery from Mature SAGD Wells in Canada.Presented at the 7th UNITAR International Conference on Heavy Crude and TarSands, Beijing, China, 27-31 October. Paper No. 1998.214.
Li, P. 2006. Numerical Simulation of the SAGD Process Coupled withGeomechanical Behavior. PhD thesis, The University of Alberta,Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
O'Rourke, J.C., Chambers, J.I., Suggelt, J.C. et al. 1994. UTFProject Status And Commercial Potential An Update, May 1994. Presented at the48th Annual Technical Meeting of the Petroleum Society of CIM, Calgary, 12-15June. PETSOC-94-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94-40.
Queipo, N.V., Pintos, S., Rincón, N. et al. 2002. Surrogatemodeling-based optimization for the integration of static and dynamic data intoa reservoir description. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 35 (3-4):167-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(02)00238-3.
Reis, J.C. 1992. A Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Model ForTar Sands: Linear Geometry. J Can Pet Technol 31 (10):14-20. PETSOC-92-10-01. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/92-10-01.
Sarma, P. and Xie, J. 2011. Efficient and Robust UncertaintyQuantification in Reservoir Simulation with Polynomial Chaos Expansions andNon-intrusive Spectral Projection. Presented at the Reservoir SimulationSymposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 21-23 February. SPE-141963-MS.
Scott, J.D., Proskin, S.A., and Adhikary, D.P. 1994.Volume And Permeability Changes Associated With Steam Stimulation In an OilSands Reservoir. J Can Pet Technol 33 (7): 44-52.PETSOC-94-07-06. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94-07-06.
Settari, A. and Walters, D.A. 2001. Advances in CoupledGeomechanical and Reservoir Modeling With Applications to Reservoir Compaction.SPE J. 6 (3): 334-342. SPE-51927-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/51927-MS.
Silva, P.C., Maschio, C., and Schiozer, D.J. 2008.Application of Neural Network and Global Optimization in History Matching. JCan Pet Technol 47 (11): 22-25. JCPT Paper No. 08-11-22-TN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/08-11-22-TN.
Sun, X. and Mohanty, K.K. 2005. Estimation of Flow FunctionsDuring Drainage Using Genetic Algorithm. SPE J. 10 (4):449-457. SPE-84548-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84548-PA.
Vanegas, J.W.P., Deutsch, C.V., and Cunha, L.B. 2008.Uncertainty Assessment of SAGD Performance Using a Proxy Model Based onButler's Theory. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Denver, 21-24 September. SPE-115662-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/115662-MS.
Williams, G.J.J., Mansfield, M., MacDonald, D.G. et al. 2004.Top-Down Reservoir Modeling. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. SPE-89974-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89974-MS.
Zubarev, D.I. 2009. Pros and Cons of Applying Proxy-Models as aSubstitute for Full Reservoir Simulations. Presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4-7 October. SPE-124815-MS.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124815-MS.