Produced-Water-Reinjection Design and Uncertainties Assessment
- Jalel Ochi (Total E&P France) | Dominique Dexheimer (Total E&P France) | P. Vincent Corpel (Total E&P France)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2014
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 192 - 203
- 2014.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal
- water quality and injection pressure specifications, produced water reinjection, design, modeling, uncertainties assessment
- 12 in the last 30 days
- 600 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Produced-water reinjection (PWRI) is an important strategy for deriving value from waste water (Abou Sayed et al. 2005), but its implementation can face challenges related to injectivity and safety issues. Reinjection in fracturing regime is often the only option to guarantee the sustainability of injectivity (Detienne et al. 2005), but it can present some risks to be anticipated early in the design phase. The first objective of a PWRI-design study is to supply water-quality specifications to petroleum architects (in terms of solid and oil contents) to allow for the design of water-treatment facilities. The second objective is to supply injection-pressure specifications for the design of injection pumps and an injection network. These specifications must allow for sustaining well injectivity over the life of the field, while preventing any risk of caprock failure. The water-quality specification is of prime importance because a maximum of contaminant injection is sought to minimize the cost related to water treatment, but at the same time, it must prevent any injectivity loss or excessive increase of pressure beyond which fracture confinement is no longer possible. Water quality and injection pressure are thus linked to each other. They are deduced by simulation on a case-by-case basis. The modeling approach used by Total was presented in previous publications (Detienne et al. 1998, 2005; Ochi et al. 2007). The objective of this paper is to detail the manner in which the two parameters are deduced when uncertainties on input data are considered. Indeed, a workflow for uncertainty management based on experimental design and Monte Carlo theories was implemented to combine the simultaneous effect of a relatively large number of uncertain parameters, each of them being characterized by its own probabilistic distribution. Two-thousand simulations were run systematically, and water-quality and injection-pressure specifications were supplied with a probabilistic value (P10, P50, and P90). Application of this approach to real-design examples is detailed and discussed in this paper.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Abou Sayed A.S., Zaki, K.S., Wang, G. et al. 2007. Produced Water Management Strategy Water-Injection Best Practices: Design, Performance, Monitoring. SPE Prod & Oper 22 (1) 59–68. SPE-108238-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/108238-PA.
Abou-Sayed, A.S., Zaki, K.S., Wang, G.G. et al. 2005. A Mechanistic Model for Formation Damage and Fracture Propagation During Water Injection. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, Sheveningen, The Netherlands, 25–27 May. SPE-94606-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94606-MS.
Bachman, R.C., Harding, T.G., Settari, A. et al. 2003. Coupled Simulation of Reservoir Flow, Geomechanics, and Formation Plugging With Application to High-Rate Produced Water Reinjection. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Symposium, Houston, 3–5 February. SPE-79695-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/79695-MS.
Barkman, J.H. and Davidson, D.H. 1972. Measuring Water Quality and Predicting Well Impairment. J Pet Technol 24 (7): 865–873. SPE-3543-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3543-PA.
Buret, S., Nabzar, L., and Jada, A. 2010. Water Quality and Well Injectivity: Do Residual Oil-in-Water Emulsions Matter? SPE J. 15 (2): 557-568. SPE-122060-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/122060-PA.
Charles, T., Guemene, J.M., Corre, B. et al. 2001. Experience with the Quantification of Subsurface Uncertainties. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia 17-19 April. SPE-68703-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/68703-MS.
Corre, B., Thore, P., de Feraudy, V. et al. 2000. Integrated Uncertainty Assessment For Project Evaluation and Risk Analysis. Presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference, Paris, France 24-25 October. SPE-65205-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/65205-MS.
de Souza, A.L.S., Fernandes, P.D., Mendes, R. et al. 2005. The Impact of Fracture Propagation on Sweep Efficiency During a Waterflooding Process. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20-23 June. SPE-94704-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94704-MS.
Detienne, J.-L., Creusol, M., Kessler, N. et al. 1998. Thermally Induced Fractures: A Field-Proven Analytical Model. SPE Res Eval & Eng 1 (1): 30-35. SPE-30777-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30777-PA.
Detienne, J.L., Ochi, J., and Rivet, P. 2005. A Simulator for Produced Water Re-injection in Thermally Fractured Wells. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, Scheveningen, The Netherlands, 25–27 May. SPE-95021-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/95021-MS.
Eylander, J.G.R. 1988. Suspended Solids Specifications for Water Injection From Coreflood Tests. SPE Res Eng 3 (4): 1,287-1,294. SPE-16256-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16256-PA.
Hofsaess, T. and Kleinitz, W. 2003. 30 Years of Predicting Injectivity after Barkman & Davidson: Where are we today? Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, 13–14 May. SPE-82231-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/82231-MS.
Ochi, J., Detienne, J.-L., and Rivet, P. 2007. Internal formation damage properties and oil deposition profile. Presented at the European Formation Damage Conference, Scheveningen, The Netherlands 30 May-1 June. SPE-108010-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/108010-MS.
Onaisi, A., Ochi, J., Mainguy, M. et al. 2011. Modelling Non-Matrix Flow And Seals Integrity In Soft Sand Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, Noordwijk, The Netherlands 7-10 June. SPE-144801-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/144801-MS.
Pang, S. and Sharma, M.M. 1995. Evaluating the Performance of Open-Hole, Perforated and Fractured Water Injection Wells. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, 15-16 May. SPE-30127-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30127-MS.
Simonson, E.R., Abou-Sayed, A.S., and Clifton, R.J. 1978. Containment of Massive Hydraulic Fractures. SPE J. 18 (1): 27–32. SPE-6089-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6089-PA.
van den Hoek, P.J., Matsuura, T., de Kroon, M. et al. 1996. Simulation of Produced Water Re-Injection Under Fracturing Conditions. Presented at the European Petroleum Conference, Milan, Italy, 22–24 October. SPE-36846-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36846-MS.
Yuan, H., Nielsen, S.M., Shapiro, A.A. et al. 2012. A New Comprehensive Approach for Predicting Injectivity Decline During Waterflooding. Presented at the SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4-7 June. SPE-154509-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/154509-MS.