Engineering Cementing Solution for Hutubi Underground-Gas-Storage Project
- Xue Jia Zhang (Schlumberger) | Salim Taoutaou (Schlumberger) | Yabin Guo (Schlumberger) | Yong Liang An (Schlumberger) | Shou Ming Zhong (Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina) | Yun Wang (Xibu Drilling and Engineering Company, PetroChina)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- February 2014
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 88 - 97
- 2014.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.14 Casing and Cementing, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 4.6 Natural Gas
- stress analysis, Underground gas storage, Flexible expandable cement system
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 399 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Underground gas storage (UGS) is an important segment in China’s gas market. Because of the supply-and-demand misbalance of natural gas, the gas in underground storage is made available during the peak winter season. In the west of China, the Hutubi dry-gas field is to be used for UGS with a storage capacity of 4.5 x 109 m3. A total of 37 wells will be drilled with 30 natural-gas-injection/- withdrawal wells, five observation wells, and two water-injection wells. UGS relies on proper wellbore construction and the sealing function of the caprock. The selection of the type of cement is crucial to having a healthy well that will last to meet the gas-storage need of 30 years under high-intensity injection. The gas injection and withdrawal will induce different stresses on the cement sheath and may destroy the seal by either debonding (microannulus) or cracking; an effective cement system is required to prevent the leakage of the gas and flow through the caprock. A specialized cement technology was identified as a solution to UGS and was deployed successfully in the Hutubi field with good results. The cement selected had to meet the pressure and temperature challenges associated with UGS, and a methodology was established to qualify the new sealant. Case histories of three wells illustrate the steps taken in cementing UGS wells in the field.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
API RP 10B-2, Recommended Practice for Testing Well Cements, first edition, 2005. Washington, DC: API.
James, S. and Boukhelifa, L. 2006. Zonal Isolation Modeling and Measurements—Past Myths and Today’s Realities. Paper SPE 101310 presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 5–8 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118-MS.
Laidler, A., Taoutaou, S., and Johnson, C.R. 2007. A Risk-Analysis Approach Using Stress Analysis Models to Design for Cement Sheath Integrity in Multilateral Well. Paper IPTC 11059 presented at the International Technology Conference, Dubai, United Arab Emirate, 4–6 December.
Taoutaou, S., Luangkhot-Bonnecaze, A., Dondale, A. et al. 2010. Ensuring Complete Well Integrity for HPHT Wells—Brunei Case Study. Paper SPE 136884-PP presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirate, 1–4 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/136884-PP-MS.
Thiercelin, M.J., Dargaud, B., Baret, J.F. et al. 1997. Cement Design Based on Cement Mechanical Response. Paper SPE 52890 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 5–8 October. http://dx.doiorg/10.2118/52890-MS.