An Estimate of the Near-Term Electricity-Generation Potential of Coproduced Water From Active Oil and Gas Wells
- Chad Augustine (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) | David M. Falkenstern (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2014
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 530 - 541
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 7.4.3 Market analysis / supply and demand forcasting/pricing
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 208 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
This study estimates the near-term market electricity-generation potentialof water produced as a byproduct from active oil and gas operations. Ageographic information system (GIS) was developed to combine oil- and gas-welllocation, depth, and water-production information from 2.5 million wells (halfa million of which were identified as active, producing wells) withgeothermal-resource maps and to estimate the power-generation potential of thecoproduction resource. The study found that the near-term market potential forthe coproduction resource from active oil and gas wells is approximately 300 MWof electrical output (MWe), which is less than suggested in previousstudies.
|File Size||939 KB||Number of Pages||12|
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG). 1994. Geothermal Surveyof North America (GSNA). AAPG Data ROM, Tulsa, Oklahoma:AAPG/Datapages.
Blackwell, D.D. and Richards, M. 2004a. The 2004 Geothermal Map of NorthAmerica: Explanation of Resources and Application. In Geothermal ResourcesCouncil Trans., Vol. 28, 317-320. Geothermal Resources Council AnnualMeeting, Davis, California, 29 August-1 September 2004.
Blackwell, D.D. and Richards, M. 2004b. Calibration of the AAPG GeothermalSurvey of North America BHT Database. Paper 87616 poster presented at the AAPGAnnual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, April.
Blackwell, D., Richards, M., and Stepp, P. 2010. Texas Geothermal Assessmentfor the I35 Corridor East. Final Report for Texas State Energy ConservationOffice, Contract CM709, Southern Methodist University Geothermal Laboratory,Dallas, Texas (29 March).
Curtice, R.J. and Dalrymple, E.D. 2004. Just the Cost of Doing Business?World Oil 225 (10): 77-78.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). 2006. The Future of GeothermalEnergy: Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the21st Century. INL/EXT-06-11746, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT for the IdahoNational Laboratory and the US Department of Energy. Online, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/future_geothermal.html.
McKenna, J., Blackwell, D., Moyes, C. et al. 2005. Geothermal Electric PowerSupply Possible from the Gulf Coast, Midcontinent Oil Field Waters. Oil& Gas J. 103 (33): 34-40.
Pratt & Whitney. 2011a. Pratt & Whitney Power Systems OrganicRankine Cycle Technology. PS-S0022.01.10 Online, http://www.pw.utc.com/media_center/assets/pwps_orc_brochure.pdf(downloaded 1 November 2011).
Pratt & Whitney. 2011b. Model 280 PureCycle Power System. PS-S0030.05.11Online, http://www.pw.utc.com/media_center/assets/model_280_purecycle_power_system.pdf(downloaded 1 November 2011).
Reinhardt, T., Johnson, L.A., and Popovich, N. 2011. Systems for ElectricalPower from Coproduced and Low Temperature Geothermal Resources. Proceedingsof the Thirty-Sixth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, StanfordUniversity, California, 31 January-2 February. Online, http://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2011/reinhardt.pdf.
Veil, J.A. and Clark, C.E. 2009. Produced Water Volumes and ManagementPractices in the United States. ANL/ENS/R-09/1, Environmental Science Division,Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois (1 September). http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1007397.