Understanding the Heat-Transfer Mechanism in the Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage (SAGD) Process and Comparing the Conduction and Convection Flux in Bitumen Reservoirs
- Mazda Irani (RPS Energy) | Sahar Ghannadi (University of Alberta)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- January 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 134 - 145
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 1,422 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
SAGD is one successful thermal recovery technique applied in the Athabasca and Peace River reservoirs in central and northern Alberta, Canada. In SAGD, steam is injected into a horizontal injection well and is forced outward, losing its latent heat when it comes into contact with the cold bitumen at the edge of a depletion chamber. As a consequence, the viscosity of the bitumen falls several orders of magnitude, its mobility rises several orders of magnitude, and then it flows under gravity toward a horizontal production well located several meters below and parallel to the injection well. Heat-transfer mechanisms are pivotal to the SAGD process. Though heat energy is transferred from steam to reservoir by conduction and convection, heat transfer by convection is not considered in the classic SAGD mathematical models such as Butler?s. Researchers such as Butler and Stephens (1981), Reis (1992), Akin (2005), Liang (2005), Nukhaev et al. (2006), and Azad and Chalaturnyk (2010) considered conduction from steam to cold reservoir to be the only heat-transfer component. However, because the heat capacity of water is typically two to five times that of bitumen, convection caused by the mobile condensate flow in the reservoir may contradict these studies. Farouq-Ali (1997) was the first to criticize the assumption that there is only a thermal conduction mechanism in the SAGD process. He pointed out that with so much condensate flowing, convection would be expected to be the dominant heat-transfer mechanism, which can be plausible at high temperatures. In response, Edmunds (1999a) stated that on the basis of the associated change in enthalpy, the heat transfer into a cold reservoir because of convection is probably less than 5% of that because of conduction. Ito (1999) challenged Edmunds (1999a) statement, on the basis of Ito and Suzuki (1996, 1999) and Ito et al. (1998), pointing out that "this number, 5%; i.e., ratio between convection to conduction presented by Edmunds (1999a) is unrealistically low, (and) it should be in the range of 50%." This study examined the relative roles of convective and conductive heat transfer at the edge of SAGD steam chambers. In summary, the mathematical model developed in this study considered both conduction and convection, and the resultant output from the model is reasonably consistent with published field data. This study supports the idea that although convection can dominate near the chamber edge in high-water-saturation reservoirs, in bitumen-rich reservoirs, its contribution to heat transfer is less than 1% and can be neglected.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Aherne, A.L. and Maini, B. 2006. Fluid Movement in the SAGD Process: AReview of the Dover Project. Paper CIPC 2006-153 presented at the CanadianInternational Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13-15 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2006-153.
Akin, S., 2005. Mathematical Modeling of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage.SPE Res Eval Eng. 8 (5): 372-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/86963-PA.
Al-Bahlani, A.M. and Babadagli, T. 2009. SAGD Laboratory Experimental andNumerical Simulation Studies: A Review of Current Status and Future Issues.J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 68: 135-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.06.011.
Azad, A. and Chalaturnyk, R.J. 2010. A Mathematical Improvement to SAGDUsing Geomechanical Modelling. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 49 (10):53-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/141303-PA.
Bennion, D.B., Thomas, F.B., Schulmeister, B. et al. 2006. A Correlation ofthe Low and High Temperature Water-Oil Relative Permeability Characteristics ofTypical Western Canadian Unconsolidated Bitumen Producing Formations. Paperpresented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference Calgary, Alberta,13-15 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2006-092.
Birrell, G., 2001. Heat Transfer Ahead of a SAGD Steam Chamber: A Study ofThermocouple Data from Phase B of the Underground Test Facility (DoverProject). Paper 2001-88 presented at the Pet. Soc. of CIM's CanadianInternational Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, 12-14 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71503-MS.
Butler, R.M. and Stephens, D.J., 1981. The Gravity Drainage of Steam-HeatedHeavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 20(2): 90-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/81-02-07.
Butler, R.M. 1985. A New Approach to the Modelling of Steam-Assisted GravityDrainage. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 24 (3): 42-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/85-03-01.
Butler, R.M. 1987. Rise of Interfering Steam Chambers. J. Cdn. Pet.Tech. 26 (3): 70-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87-03-07.
Butler, R.M., 1991. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. EnglewoodCliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Butler, R.M., 1994a. Horizontal Wells for the Recovery of Oil, Gas andBitumen, Petroleum Society Monograph Number 2. Westmount, Quebec, Canada:Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum.
Butler, R.M., 1994b. Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage, Concept, Development,Performance and Future., J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 33 (2): 44-50.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94-02-05.
Clark, H.P., Ascanio, F.A., Van Kruijsdijk, C., et al. 2010. Method toImprove Thermal EOR Performance Using Intelligent Well Technology: Orion SAGDField Trial. Paper SPE 137133 presented at the Canadian UnconventionalResources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,19-21 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/137133-MS.
Das, S.K., 2005. Wellbore Hydraulics in a SAGD Well Pair. SPE/PS-CIM/CHOAInternational Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta,Canada, 1-3 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97922-MS.
Das, S.K. and Butler, R.M., 1996. Countercurrent Extraction of Heavy Oil andBitumen. Paper SPE 37094 presented at the International Conference onHorizontal Well Technology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 18-20 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37094-MS.
Edmunds, N., 1999a On the Difficult Birth of SAGD. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 38 (1): 14-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99-01-DA.
Edmunds, N., 2000. Investigation of SAGD Steam Trap Control in Two and ThreeDimensions. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 39 (1): 30-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/50413-MS.
Edmunds, N.R., Haston, J.A., and Best, D.A. 1989. Analysis andImplementation of the Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Process at the AOSTRAUTF. In the 4th UNITAR/UNDP International Conference on Heavy Crude and TarSands, 7-12 August 1988, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, Vol. 4, pp.223-242.
Edmunds, N.R., Kovalsky, J.A., Gittins, S.D. et al. 1994. Review of Phase ASteam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Test. SPE Res Eval Eng 9(2): 119-124. SPE 21529. http://dx.doi.og/10.2118/21529-PA.
Farouq-Ali, S.M. 1997. Is There Life After SAGD? J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 36 (6): 20-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97-06-DAS.
Ferguson, F.R.S., and Butler, R.M. 1988. Steam Assisted Gravity DrainageModel Incorporating Energy Recovery from a Cooling Steam Chamber. J. Cdn.Pet. Tech. 27 (5): 75-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97-06-DAS.
Gates, I.D., Kenny, J., Hernandez-Hdez, I.L. et al. 2007. Steam-InjectionStrategy and Energetics of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage, SPE Res EvalEng 10 (1): 19-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97742-PA.
Gotawala, D.R., and Gates, I.D., 2008. Steam Fingering at the Edge of aSteam Chamber in a Heavy Oil Reservoir, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 86(6): 1011-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20117.
Ito, Y. 1999. Discussion of "On the Difficult Birth of SAGD." J. Cdn.Pet. Tech. 38 (1): 22-24.
Ito, Y. and Ipek, G. 2005. Steam Fingering Phenomenon During SAGD Process.Paper SPE 97729 presented at the SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International ThermalOperations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1-3 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97729-MS.
Ito, Y. and Suzuki, S. 1996. Numerical Simulation of the SAGD Process in theHangingstone Oil Sands Reservoir. Paper 96-57 presented at the Annual TechnicalMeeting, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 10-12 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/96-57.
Ito, Y. and Suzuki, S. 1999. Numerical Simulation of the SAGD Process in theHangingstone Oil Sands Reservoir. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 38(9): 27-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99-09-02.
Ito, Y., Suzuki, S., and Yamada, H. 1998. Effect of Reservoir Parameter onOil Rates and Steam Oil Ratios in SAGD Projects. Presented at the 7th UNITARInternational Conference on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands, 27-30 October 1998,Beijing, China. Tulsa, Oklahoma: International Center for HeavyHydrocarbons.
Jimenez, J. 2008. The Field Performance of SAGD Projects in Canada. Paperpresented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia, 3-5 December. http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/12860-MS.
Liang, L. 2005. An Analytical Model for Cyclic Steaming of Horizontal Wells,MS thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
McCormack, M., 2002. SAGD Injection Wells—What Your Prof. Never Told You.J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 41 (3): 17-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/02-03-DA.
Mehrotra, A.K., and Svrcek, W.Y. 1986. Viscosity of Compressed AthabascaBitumen. Can. J. Civil Eng. 64: 844-847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450640520.
Nasr, T.N., Law, D.H.S., Golbeck, H., et al. 2000. Counter-Current Aspect ofthe SAGD Process. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 39 (1): 41-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/00-01-03.
Nukhaev, M., Pimenov, V., Shandrygin, A., et al. 2006. A New AnalyticalModel for the SAGD Production Phase. Paper SPE 102084 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24-27September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102084-MS.
O'Rourke, J.C., Begley, A.G., Boyle, H.A., et al. 1999. UTF Project StatusUpdate, May 1997. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 38 (9): 44-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97-08.
O'Rourke, J.C., Chambers, J.I., Suggelt, J.C. et al. 1994. UTF ProjectStatus and Commercial Potential: An Update, May 1994. Paper PETSOC 94-40presented at the Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 12-15June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94-40.
Reis, J.C. 1992. A Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands:Linear Geometry. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 31 (10): 14-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/92-10-01.
Reis, J.C. 1993. A Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands:Radial Geometry. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 32 (8): 43-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93-08-05.
Sharma, J., and Gates, I.D. 2011a. Convection at the Edge of aSteam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Steam Chamber. SPE J. 16(3): 503-512. SPE 142432-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/142432-PA.
Sharma, J., and Gates, I.D. 2011b. Interfacial Stability of In-Situ BitumenThermal Solvent Recovery Processes. SPE J. 16 (1): 55-64.SPE 130050-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/130050-PA.
Shaw, J., and Bedry, M. 2012. SAGD Field Trial for a New Intelligent WellCompletions Strategy to Increase Thermal EOR Recoveries. Paper SPE 150477presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy International, Utrecht, TheNetherlands, 27-29 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/150477-MS.