Air-Foam-Injection Process: An Improved-Oil-Recovery Technique for Waterflooded Light-Oil Reservoirs
- Xiaohu Dong (China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Huiqing Liu (China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Peng Sun (China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Jiapeng Zheng (Jidong Oilfield Company, CNPC) | Rong Sun (Jidong Oilfield Company, CNPC)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 436 - 444
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 1,254 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
With the intent of solving problems that emerge at the later stage of waterflooded reservoirs, we study the feasibility of air-foam flooding of waterflooded light-oil reservoirs using the method of physical simulation. Through isothermal combustion experiments, the influence of clay mineral and foam on low-temperature-oxidation (LTO) reactions is investigated qualitatively. Then, the quantitative investigation of water saturation on oxidation rate and O2 consumption rate is discussed. After that, some dynamic foam displacement experiments are also performed, including the single-tube displacement experiments of air foam at different water saturations and enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) experiments of air-foam flooding in parallel tubes. In addition, in order to verify the O2 consumption capacity of the sample oil, a slimtube experiment is conducted. The results show that the presence of clay minerals could speed the process of the LTO reaction, while the presence of foam will slow this process. The LTO reaction is not significantly associated with oil viscosity. The concentration of O2 was near zero when the gas breakthrough occurred. Once the oxidation region reached the outlet, the concentration of O2 suddenly increased, and the effect of O2 consumption became worse. G64-38 crude oil performs better in the process of O2 consumption. The injection of air foam could effectively plug the high-permeability tube and restart the low-permeability tube. This paper could be used as a tool for the successful design of air-foam flooding at a later waterflood stage to enhance crude-oil recovery in light-oil reservoirs.
|File Size||704 KB||Number of Pages||9|
Alvarado, V. and Manrique, E. 2010. Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Update Review.Energies 3 (9): 1529-1575. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en3091529.
Burger, J.G. and Sahuquet, B.C. 1972. Chemical Aspects of In-SituCombustion--Heat of Combustion and Kinetics. SPE J. 12 (5):410-422. SPE-3599-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3599-PA.
Clara, C., Durandeau, M., Quenault, G. et al. 2000. Laboratory Studies forLight-Oil Air Injection Projects: Potential Application in Handil Field. SPERes Eval & Eng 3 (3): 239-248. SPE-64272-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/64272-PA.
Earlougher, R.C. Jr., Galloway, J.R., and Parsons, R.W. 1970.Performance of the Fry In-Situ Combustion Project. J Pet Technol 22 (5): 551-557. SPE-2409-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2409-PA.
Faure, P. and Landais, P. 2000. Evidence for clay minerals catalytic effectsduring low-temperature air oxidation of n-alkanes. Fuel 79 (14):1751-1756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-2361(00)00039-9.
Faure, P., Schlepp, L., Burkle-Vitzthum, V. et al. 2003. Low temperature airoxidation of n-alkanes in the presence of Na-smectite. Fuel 82 (14): 1751-1762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-2361(03)00133-9.
Gauglitz, P.A., Friedmann, F., Kam, S.I. et al. 2002. Foam Generation inPorous Media. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa,13-17 April. SPE-75177-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/75177-MS.
Greaves, M., Ren, S.R., and Rathbone, R.R. 1998. Air InjectionTechnique (LTO Process) for IOR from Light Oil Reservoirs: Oxidation Rate andDisplacement Studies. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium,Tulsa, 19-22 April. SPE-40062-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/40062-MS.
Greaves, M., Ren, S.R., Rathbone, R.R. et al. 2000. Improved Residual LightOil Recovery by Air Injection (LTO process). J Can Pet Technol 39 (1): 57-61. JCPT Paper No. 00-01-05. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/00-01-05.
Kok, M.V. and Karacan, C.O. 2000. Behavior and Effect of SARA Fractions ofOil During Combustion. SPE Res Eval & Eng 3 (5):380-385. SPE-66021-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/66021-PA.
Kovscek, A.R. and Bertin, H.J. 2002. Estimation of Foam Mobility inHeterogeneous Porous Media. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil RecoverySymposium, Tulsa, 13-17 April. SPE-75181-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/75181-MS.
Li, D.W. 1991. Current Situation of EOR of Gas Flooding in SovietUnion. World Petroleum Science 42 (5): 58-63.
Li, Y. 2009. Study on enhancing oil recovery of continental reservoir bywater drive technology. Acta Petrolei Sincia 30 (3):396-399.
Liu, Y., Liu, Y.F., Chen, Y. et al. 2010. Experimental study on static lowtemperature oxidation of oxidation of light oil with injected air. Spec. OilGas Reservoirs 17 (3): 96-99.
Liu, Y., Sun, L., Sun, L.T. et al. 2008. Study on Low Temperature OxidationKinetics for Light-Oil Air Injection. Appl. Chemical Industry 37 (8): 899-902.
Manrique, E.J., Thomas, C.P., Ravikiran, R. et al. 2010. EOR: Current Statusand Opportunities. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa,24-28 April. SPE-130113-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/130113-MS.
Moore, R.G., Belgrave, J.D.M., Mehta, R. et al. 1992. Some InsightsInto the Low-Temperature and High-Temperature In-Situ Combustion Kinetics.Presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 22-24 April.SPE-24174-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24174-MS.
Moore, R.G., Laureshen, C.J., Ursenbach, M.G. et al. 1999. A CanadianPerspective on In Situ Combustion. J Can Pet Technol 38(13): 1-8. JCPT Paper No. 99-13-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99-13-35.
Pascual, M., Crosta, D., Lacentre, P. et al. 2005. Air Injection Intoa Mature Waterflooded Light Oil Reservoir. Laboratory and Simulation Resultsfor Barrancas Field, Argentina. Presented at the SPE Europec/EAGE AnnualConference, Madrid, Spain, 13-16 June. SPE 94092. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94092-MS.
Ren, S.R., Greaves, M., and Rathbone, R.R. 2002. Air Injection LTOProcess: An IOR Technique for Light-Oil Reservoirs. SPE J. 7 (1): 90-99. SPE-57005-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/57005-PA.
Ren, S.R., Yu, H.M., Zuo, J.L. et al. 2009. EOR technology of profilecontrol and displacement process by air foam injection in Zhongyuan Oilfield.Acta Petrolei Sincia 30 (3): 413-417.
Sarma, H.K. and Das, S.C. 2009. Air Injection Potential in Kenmore Oilfieldin Eromanga Basin, Australia: A Screening Study Through Thermogravimetric andCalorimetric Analyses. Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show andConference, Bahrain, 15-18 March. SPE-120595-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/120595-MS.
Shen, P.P. and Liao, X.W. 2009. The Technology of Carbon Dioxide Storedin Geological Media and Enhanced Oil Recovery (in Chinese). Beijing, China:Petroleum Industry Press.
Stokka, S., Oesthus, A., and Frangeul, J. 2005. Evaluation of AirInjection as an IOR Method for the Giant Ekofisk Chalk Field. Presented at theSPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, KualaLumpur, 5-6 December. SPE-97481-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97481-MS.
Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D., and Seright, R.S. 1997. EOR ScreeningCriteria Revisited—Part 1: Introduction to Screening Criteria and EnhancedRecovery Field Projects. SPE Res Eng 12 (3): 189-198.SPE-35385-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/35385-PA.
Teramoto, T., Uematsu, H., Takabayashi, K. et al. 2006. Air-Injection EOR inHighly Water-Saturated Light-Oil Reservoir. Presented at the SPE Europec/EAGEAnnual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 12-15 June. SPE-100215-MS.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/100215-MS.
Turta, A.T. and Singhal, A.K. 2001. Reservoir Engineering Aspects ofLight-Oil Recovery by Air Injection. SPE Res Eval & Eng 4 (4): 336-344. SPE-72503-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/72503-PA.
Wang, J.X., Zhang, Q., Li, A.S. et al. 2003. Modulation mechanism oflow-pressure pulse jet and modulator working simulation (in Chinese).Journal of the University of Petroleum, China 27 (4):73-75.
Yu, H., Yang, B., Xu, G. et al. 2008. Air Foam Injection for IOR: FromLaboratory to Field Implementation in ZhongYuan Oilfield China. Presented atthe SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 20-23 April.SPE-113913-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/113913-MS.
Yu, H.M., Ren, S.R., Zuo, J.L. et al. 2009. Modulation mechanism oflow-pressure pulse jet and modulator working simulation (in Chinese).Journal of the University of Petroleum, China 33 (2):94-99.