A New Foam Model in Pipes for Drilling and Fracturing Application
- Ali Edrisi (Louisiana State University) | Seung I. Kam (Louisiana State University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- August 2014
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 576 - 585
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.2.2 Fluid Modeling, Equations of State, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 1.7.1 Underbalanced Drilling, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.8.1 Tight Gas, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 1.7.7 Cuttings Transport
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 434 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
A series of recent experimental studies revealed that foam flow can berepresented by two distinct flow regimes in general--low quality regime,showing stable plug-flow pattern, and high-quality regime, showing unstableslug-flow pattern. This study, for the first time, presents how to develop acomprehensive foam model that can handle a variety of bubble-size distributionsand both stable and unstable flow patterns with a two-flow-regime concept.Building an improved foam model on the basis of such a new concept canpotentially help to better design and optimize many foam-associated processesincluding tight-gas and shale gas foam fracturing, foam underbalanced drilling,foam liquid unloading, and cuttings transport. Analyzing the experimental dataof surfactant foams and polymer- added foams shows that (i) in the low-qualityregime, foam rheology is governed by bubble slippage at the wall with nosignificant change in its fine foam texture and (ii) in the high-qualityregime, foam rheology is governed by the relative size of free-gas segment tofine-textured foam-slug segment. With these governing mechanisms, this improvedfoam model successfully reproduces foam-flow characteristics as observed in theexperiments, including almost-horizontal pressure contours in the low-qualityregime and inclined pressure contours in the high-quality regime. Although themodel is built with a power-law fluid model, the same procedure can be appliedfor Bingham-plastic or yield-power-law fluids.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Bekkour, K. 1999. Evaluation of Slip Effects in the Capillary Flow of Foams.Appl. Rheol. 9: 10-16.http://dx.doi.org/10.3933/ApplRheol-9-10.
Beyer, A.H., Millhone, R.S., and Foote, R.W. 1972. Flow Behavior of Foam asa Well Circulating Fluid. Paper SPE 3986 presented at the Fall Meeting of theSociety of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, San Antonio, Texas, 8-11 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3986-MS.
Blauer, R.E. and Kohlhaas, C.A. 1974. Formation Fracturing With Foam. PaperSPE 5003 presented at the Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers ofAIME, Houston, Texas, 6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5003-MS.
Bogdanovic, M., Gajbhiye, R.N., and Kam, S.I. 2009. Experimental Study ofFoam Flow in Pipes: Two Distinct Flow Regimes. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Eng. Aspect 344 (1): 56-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.02.019.
Briceno, M.I. and Joseph, D.D. 2003. Self-Lubricated Transport of AqueousFoams in Horizontal Conduits. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 29:1817-1831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2003.10.001.
Calvert, J.R. and Nezhati, K. 1986. A Rheological Model for a Liquid-GasFoam. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 7 (3): 164-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142-727X(86)90016-0.
Capo, J., Yu, M., and Miska, S.Z. 2006. Cuttings Transport With Aqueous Foamat Intermediate Inclined Wells. SPE Drill & Compl 21(2): 99-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89534-PA.
Curtis, J.B. 2002. Fractured Shale-Gas Systems. AAPG Bull. 86 (11): 1921-1938.
Darby, R. 2001. Chemical Engineering Fluid Mechanics, second edition,Revised and Expanded. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
David, A. and Marsden, S.S. Jr. 1969. The Rheology of Foam. Paper SPE 2544presented at the SPE Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 28 September-1 October.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2544-MS.
Edrisi, A.R., Gajbhiye, R.N., and Kam, S.I. 2012. Experimental Study ofPolymer-Free and Polymer-Added Foams for Underbalanced Drilling: Are TwoFoam-Flow Regimes Still There? Paper SPE 162712 presented at the SPE CanadianUnconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Canada, 30 October-1 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/162712-MS.
Enzendorfer, C., Harris, R.A., Valko, P. et al. 1995. Pipe Viscometry ofFoams. J. Rheol. 2: 345-358.
Gajbhiye, R.N. and Kam, S.I. 2011. Characterization of Foam Flow inHorizontal Pipes by Using Two-Flow Regime Concept. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66 (8): 1536-1549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.012.
Gajbhiye, R.N. and Kam, S.I. 2012. The Effect of Inclination Angles on FoamRheology in Pipes. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 86-87: 246-256.
Gardiner B.S., Dlugogorski, B.Z., and Jameson, G.J. 1999. Prediction ofPressure Losses in Pipe Flow of Aqueous Foams. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38: 1099-1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie980385i.
Gupta, D.V.S., Leshchyshyn, T.T., and Hlidek, B.T. 2005. Surfactant GelFoam/Emulsion: History and Field Application in Western Canadian SedimentaryBasin. Paper SPE 97211 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Dallas, Texas, 9-12 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97211-MS.
Harris, P.C. and Heath, S.J. 1996. Rheology of Crosslinked Foams. SPEProd & Fac 11 (2): 113-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28512-PA.
Hill, D.G. and Nelson, C.R. 2000. Gas Productive Fractured Shales--AnOverview and Update. GasTIPS 6 (2): 4-13.
Hutchins, R.D. and Miller, M.J. 2005. A Circulating Foam Loop for EvaluatingFoam at Conditions of Use. SPE Prod & Fac 20 (4):286-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/80242-PA.
Kraynick, A.M. 1988. Foam Flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mechanics 20: 325-357.
Kroezen, A.B.J., Groot, W.J., and Schipper, C.A.C. 1988. The Flow Propertiesof Foam. J. Society of Dyers and Colourists 104 (10):393-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.1998.tb01138.x.
Martins, A.L., Lourenco, A.M.F., and Silva, Jr. V. 2001. Foam RheologyCharacterization as a Tool for Predicting Pressure While Drilling Wells in UBDConditions. Paper SPE/IADC 67691 presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference,Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27 February-1 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/67691-MS.
Mitchell, B.J. 1969. Viscosity of Foam. PhD thesis, University of Oklahoma,USA.
Mooney, M. 1931. Explicit Formulas for Slip and Fluidity. J. Rheol. 2: 210-222.
Neill, G.H., Dobbs, J.B., Pruitt, G.T. et al. 1964. Field and LaboratoryResults of Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen in Well Stimulation. J. Pet Tech 16 (3): 244-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/738-PA.
Newell, R. 2011. Shale Gas and the Outlook for US Natural Gas Markets andGlobal Gas Resources. Presentation to the Organization for Economic Cooperationand Development (OECD), June 21. http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.
Princen, H.M. 1989. Rheology of Foams and Highly Concentrated Emulsions: IV.An Experimental Study of the Shear Viscosity and Yield Stress of ConcentratedEmulsions. J. Colloid and Interface Sci. 128 (1):176-189.
Raza, S.H. and Marsden, S.S. 1967. The Streaming Potential and the Rheologyof Foam. SPE J. 7 (4): 359-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1748-PA.
Reidenbach, V.G., Harris, P.C., Lee, Y.N. et al. 1986. Rheological Study ofFoam Fracturing Fluids Using Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide. SPE Res Eng 1 (1): 31-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12026-PA.
Rojas, Y., Kakadjian, S., Aponte, A. et al. 2001. Stability and RheologicalBehavior of Aqueous Foams for Underbalanced Drilling. Paper SPE 64999 presentedat the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, Texas, 13-16February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/64999-MS.
Saintpere, S., Herzhaft, B., Toure, A. et al. 1999. Rheological Propertiesof Aqueous Foam for Underbalanced Drilling. Paper SPE 56633 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 3-6 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/56633-MS.
Sanghani, V. and Ikoku, C.U. 1983. Rheology of Foam and Implications inDrilling and Cleanout Operations. J. Energy Resource Technol. 105: 362-371.
Sani, A.M., Shah, S.N., and Baldwin. L. 2001. Experimental Investigation ofXanthan Foam Rheology. Paper SPE 67263 presented at the SPE Production andOperations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 24-27 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/67263-MS.
Tisne, P., Aloui, F., and Doubliez, L. 2003. Analysis of Wall Shear Stressin Wet Foam Flows Using the Electrochemical Method. Int. J. MultiphaseFlow 29 (5): 841-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(03)00038-7.
US Energy Information Administration. 2011 Annual Energy Outlook withProjects to 2035.
Zelenev, A.S., Zhou, H., Ellena, L.B. et al. 2010. Microemulsion-AssistedFluid Recovery and Improved Permeability to Gas in Shale Formations. Paper SPE127922 presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on FormationDamager Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 10-12 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/127922-MS.