First Application of Progressing Cavity Pumps for Appraisal Well Testing in the Ugandan Albertine Graben Basin
- Sekhar Sathyamoorthy (Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd) | Andries Steyn (Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd) | Jim McGilvray (Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd) | Heiko Fuchs (Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd) | Benson Ainebyona (Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd) | Pamela Kyomugisha (Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd) | Sekhar Vijapurapu (Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd) | Nana Kagga (Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd) | Robin Rindfuss (Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd) | David Basiima (Ministry of Energy and Minerals Development of Uganda)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- January 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 85 - 94
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3.1.7 Progressing Cavity Pumps, 3.1.2 Electric Submersible Pumps, 3.1.6 Gas Lift, 3 Production and Well Operations, 3.1.3 Hydraulic and Jet Pumps, 3.1.1 Beam and related pumping techniques
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 591 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Over 28 production well tests and two interference tests have been conducted in the Albertine Graben basin in Uganda since the first oil discovery in 2006. The Uganda crude is moderately viscous, and low-gas/oil ratio (GOR), and later discoveries were mostly in shallow lower-energy systems. In addition, Uganda crude has relatively high pour points and wax appearance temperatures (WATs), which result in flow-assurance challenges during production testing operations. Production challenges brought about by the low energy scenario are offset by high formation permeability (mostly in the multidarcy range).
Field X was discovered in 2008 by Well X-1, and subsequently appraised by several wells. Zone 1 of Well X-1 was production tested under natural flow without a rig. Although hydrocarbons were brought to surface successfully during the testing operation, the maximum flow rate achieved was approximately 262 BOPD, and a stable flow rate could not be sustained. Fluid-segregation effects distorted the early-time data. In addition, flow-assurance challenges prevented acquisition of late-time response from the pressure buildup (PBU). Therefore, important dynamic information, particularly in regard to flow barriers, was not obtained.
A change in completion philosophy was proposed after detailed analysis of the test results. Well X-1 was retested with a new completion design incorporating real-time surface-readout (SRO) pressure and temperature monitoring capability, a hydraulically controlled inflow control valve (ICV), a progressing cavity pump (PCP), and a surface-controlled electrical heat trace system. High-quality well-test data was acquired, and the real-time data was used extensively throughout operations to optimize flow and buildup periods and well operating envelopes. Several challenges were faced during the first completion run, leading to the use of the contingent insert PCP system to retest Zone 1.
This paper highlights the first application of a PCP completion in Uganda and describes the challenges faced during the completion and well-testing operation. The experience from Well X-1 has demonstrated that high-quality exploration and appraisal well-test data can be acquired using a PCP completion. Similar well-completion designs will be used in Uganda for appraisal of other discoveries.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Al-Bimani, A.S., Armacanqui, S., Al-Barwani, B. et al. 2008.Electrical Submersible Pumping System: Striving for Sustainable Run-LifeImprovement in Oman Oil Fields. Presented at the International PetroleumTechnology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 3-5 December. IPTC-12601-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/12601-MS.
Arvilla, C.A.R., Sanchez, P.A.A., and Peñaloza Melendez, J.E.2008. Comparative Analysis of Production Method With PCP Systems at RubialesOil Field (Colombia). Presented at the SPE Progressing Cavity Pumps Conference,Houston, 27-29 April. SPE-114191-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/114191-MS.
Bhoendie, K., Let, K.P.M.S., Mohan, A. et al. 2009. Case Studyof the Application of Pressure Transient Testing to Characterize the PumpingWells in the Calcutta Field in Suriname. Presented at the Latin American andCaribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, 31May-3 June. SPE-122924-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/122924-MS.
Lewis, B.K., Daves, D.R., and Skelton, G. 2010. Case History ofa Successful Progressing Cavity Pump Application in an Extremely Low PressureEnvironment. Presented at the SPE Progressing Cavity Pumps Conference, Alberta,Canada, 12-14 September. SPE-136546-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/136546-MS.
Martinez, M.A. and Kessler, J.M.L. 2007. Insertable PC PumpsReduce Operation Costs. Presented at the Latin American & CaribbeanPetroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 15-18 April.SPE-108120-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/108120-MS.
Ramos, M.A., Brown, J.C., Quijada, M. et al. 2008. Experiencesand Best Practices in the use of PCP's in Orinoco Belt Carabobo Area,Venezuela. Presented at the World Heavy Oil Congress, Edmonton, Alberta, 10-12March. Paper 2008-307.
Shukri, M.S.A. and Abou-El-Khair, A.-M. 2009. InnovativeProgressive Cavity Pump Design for Brown Fields in South of Oman. Presented atthe SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium, AlKhobar, Saudi Arabia, 9-11May. SPE-126049-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/126049-MS.