- Boolean operators
- This OR that
This AND that
This NOT that
- Must include "This" and "That"
- This That
- Must not include "That"
- This -That
- "This" is optional
- This +That
- Exact phrase "This That"
- "This That"
- (this AND that) OR (that AND other)
- Specifying fields
- publisher:"Publisher Name"
author:(Smith OR Jones)
Hydraulic-Fracture Geomechanics and Microseismic-Source Mechanisms
- Norman R. Warpinski (Pinnacle - A Halliburton Service) | Michael Mayerhofer (Pinnacle - A Halliburton Service) | Karn Agarwal (Pinnacle - A Halliburton Service) | Jing Du (Total E&P Research and Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- May 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 766 - 780
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.1.10 Reservoir geomechanics, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation
- 23 in the last 30 days
- 1,757 since 2007
- Show more detail
Interpretation of microseismic results and attempts to link microseismic-source mechanisms to fracture behavior require an understanding of the geomechanics of the fracturing process. Stress calculations around fractures show that the area normal to the fracture surface is stabilized by a pressurized fracture as a result of increased total stress and decreased shear stress. In this area, microseisms can occur only if leakoff pressurizes natural fractures, bedding planes, or other weakness features, and source mechanisms are thus likely to show a volumetric component that has either opening or closing movement in addition to shear slippage. Conversely, the tip tensile region is destabilized by a reduction in total stress and an increase in shear stress, with the likelihood that microseisms would be generated in this region because of these changes. Such microseisms would not yet be invaded by the fracturing fluid, and events that are mostly shear would be expected. Systems with multiple fractures, such as those that are potentially created in multiperforation-cluster stages, are much more complex, but similar elements can be outlined for those as well.
Source mechanisms can help delineate these different types of microseismic behaviors, but the evaluation of such mechanisms reveals that they provide no significant information about the hydraulic fracture. Whereas it would be valuable if source mechanisms could provide information about the mechanics of the hydraulic fracture (e.g., opening, closing, and proppant), calculations show that both the energy and volume associated with microseismicity are an insignificant fraction of the total energy and volume input into the stimulation. Thus, hydraulic fractures are almost entirely aseismic. The analysis of source mechanisms should concentrate on what those data reveal about the reservoir (e.g., natural fractures and faults). Integrated diagnostic studies provide more value in understanding both the microseismicity and interpretation of the microseismic results.
Agarwal, K., Mayerhofer, M.J., and Warpinski, N.R. 2012. Impact ofGeomechanics on Microseismicity. Paper SPE 152835 presented at the SPE/EAGEEuropean Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria,20-22 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/152835-MS.
Aki, K. and Richards, P.G. 2002. Quantitative Seismology, secondedition. Sausalito, California: University Science Books.
Albright, J.N. and Pearson, C.F. 1982. Acoustic Emissions as a Tool forHydraulic Fracture Location: Experience at the Fenton Hill Hot Dry Rock Site.SPE J. 22 (4): 523-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/9509-PA.
Astakhov, D.K., Roadarmel, W.H., and Nanyakkara, A.S. 2012. A New Method ofCharacterizing the Stimulated Reservoir Volume Using Tiltmeter-Based SurfaceMicrodeformation Measurements. Paper SPE 151017 presented at the SPE HydraulicFracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 6-8 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/151017-MS.
Branagan, P.T., Peterson, R.E., Warpinski, N.R. et al. 1996a.Characterization of a Remotely Intersected Set of Hydraulic Fractures: Resultsof Intersection Well No. 1-B, GRI/DOE Multi-Site Project. Paper SPE 36452presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver,Colorado, 6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36452-MS.
Branagan, P.T., Warpinski, N.R., Engler, B.P. et al. 1996b. Measuring theHydraulic Fracture-Induced Deformation of Reservoirs and Adjacent RocksEmploying a Deeply Buried Inclinometer Array: GRI/DOE Multi-Site Project. PaperSPE 36451 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Denver, Colorado, 6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36451-MS.
Branagan, P.T., Warpinski, N.R., Peterson, R.E. et al. 1997. Propagation ofa Hydraulic Fracture into a Remote Observation Wellbore: Results of C-SandExperimentation at the GRI/DOE M-Site Project. Paper SPE 38574 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 5-8October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38574-MS.
Brune, J.N. 1970. Tectonic Stress and the Spectra of Seismic Shear Wavesfrom Earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 75 (26): 4997-5009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB075i026p04997.
Chudnovsky, A., Fan, J., Shulkin, Y. et al. 1996. A New Hydraulic FractureTip Mechanism in a Statistically Homogeneous Medium. Paper SPE 36442 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 6-9October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36442-MS.
Cipolla, C., Maxwell, S., Mack, M. et al. 2011. A Practical Guide toInterpreting Microseismic Measurements. Paper SPE 144067 presented at the NorthAmerican Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas,14-16 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/144067-MS.
Du, J. and Warpinski, N. 2011. Uncertainty in Fault Plane Solutions fromMoment Tensor Inversion. Geophysics 76 (6): WC65-WC75.
Du, J., Zimmer, U., and Warpinski, N. 2011. Fault-Plane Solutions fromMoment Tensor Inversion for Microseismic Events Using Single-Well andMulti-Well Data. CSEG Recorder 36 (8): 22-28.
Dufumier, H. and Rivera, L. 1997. On the Resolution of the IsotropicComponent in Moment Tensor Inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 131(3): 595-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb06601.x.
East, L., Soliman, M.Y., and Augustine, J. 2011. Methods for EnhancingFar-Field Complexity in Fracturing Operations. SPE Prod & Oper 26 (3): 291-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/133380-PA.
Fairhurst, C. and Cornet, F. 1981. Rock Fracture and Fragmentation. Paper81-0021 presented at the 22nd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Cambridge,Massachusetts, 29 June-2 July.
Fehler, M. 1989. Stress Control of Seismicity Patterns Observed duringHydraulic Fracturing Experiments at the Fenton Hill Hot Dry Rock GeothermalEnergy Site, New Mexico. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech.Abstracts 26 (3-4): 211-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(89)91971-2.
Fisher, M.K., Wright, C.A., Davidson, B.M. et al. 2002. Integrating FractureMapping Technologies to Optimize Stimulations in the Barnett Shale. Paper SPE77441 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SanAntonio, Texas, 29 September-2 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/77441-MS.
Gale, J.F.W., Reed, R.M., and Holder, J. 2007. Natural fractures in theBarnett shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments. AAPGBull. 91 (4): 603-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/11010606061.
Gibowicz, S.J., Young, R.P., Talebi, S. et al. 1991. Source Parameters ofSeismic Events at the Underground Research Laboratory in Manitoba, Canada:Scaling Relations for Events with Moment Magnitude Smaller than -2.Bull. Seismolog. Soc. Am. 81 (4): 1157-1182.
Green, A.E. and Sneddon, I.N. 1950. The Distribution of Stress in theNeighbourhood of a Flat Elliptical Crack in an Elastic Solid. Math Proc.Cambridge Phil. Soc. 46 (1): 159-163.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S0305004100025585.
Holley, E.H., Zimmer, U., Mayerhofer, M. et al. 2010. Integrated AnalysisCombining Microseismic Mapping and Fiber-Optic Distributed Temperature Sensing(DTS). Paper CSUG/SPE 136565 presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resourcesand International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 19-21October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/136565-MS.
Huckabee, P. 2009. Optic Fiber Distributed Temperature for FractureStimulation Diagnostics and Well Performance Evaluation. Paper SPE 118831presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands,Texas, 19-21 January. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/118831-MS.
Jechumtálová, Z. and Sileny, J. 2005. Amplitude Ratios for Complete MomentTensor Retrieval. Geophys. Res. Lett. 322 (22):L22303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023967.
Maxwell, S.C. 2011. What Microseismic Does and Does Not Indicate AboutHydraulic Fractures. Paper presented at the 73rd EAGE Conference and ExhibitionIncorporating SPE EUROPEC 2011, Vienna, Austria, 23-26 May.
Maxwell, S.C. and Cipolla, C. 2011. What Does Microseismicity Tell Us AboutHydraulic Fracturing. Paper SPE 146932 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 30 October-2 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/146932-MS.
Mayerhofer, M.J., Stegent, N.A., Barth, J.O. et al. 2011. IntegratingFracture Diagnostics and Engineering Data in the Marcellus Shale. Paper SPE145463 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver,Colorado, 30 October-2 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/145463-MS.
Nolen-Hoeksema, R.C. and Ruff, L.J. 2001. Moment Tensor Inversion ofMicroseisms From the B-Sand Propped Hydrofracture, M-Site, Colorado.Tectonophysics 336 (1): 163-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00100-7.
Nolte, K.G. and Smith, M.B. 1981. Interpretation of Fracturing Pressures.J. Pet Tech 33 (9): 1767-1775. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8297-PA.
Palmer, I.D., Moschovidis, Z.A., and Schaefer, A. 2012. Microseismic Clouds:Modeling and Implications. Paper SPE 154903 presented at the SPE AmericasUnconventional Resources Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 5-7 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/154903-MS.
Perkins, T.K. and Krech, W.W. 1968. The Energy Balance Concept of HydraulicFracturing. SPE J. 8 (1): 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1901-PA.
Roussel, N.P. and Sharma, M.M. 2011. Optimizing Fracture Spacing andSequencing in Horizontal-Well Fracturing. SPE Prod & Oper 26 (2): 173-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/127986-PA.
Rutledge, J.T. and Phillips, W.S. 2003. Hydraulic Stimulation of NaturalFractures as Revealed by Induced Microearthquakes, Carthage Cotton Valley GasField, East Texas. Geophysics 68 (2): 441-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1567212.
Rutledge, J.T., Phillips, W.S., and Mayerhofer, M.J. 2004. Faulting Inducedby Forced Fluid Injection and Fluid Flow Forced by Faulting: An Interpretationof Hydraulic-Fracture Microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field, Texas.Bull. of the Seismolog. Soc. of Am. 94 (5):1817-1830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/012003257.
Shaffner, J., Cheng, A., Simms, S. et al. 2011. The Advantage ofIncorporating Microseismic Data into Fracture Models. Paper CSUG/SPE 148780presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary,Alberta, Canada, 15-17 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/148780-MS.
Sneddon, I.N. 1946. The Distribution of Stress in the Neighbourhood of aCrack in an Elastic Solid. Proc. Royal Soc. London, Ser. A. 187(1009): 229-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1946.0077.
Sneddon, I.N. and Elliott, H.A. 1946. The Opening of a Griffith Crack UnderInternal Pressure. Quart. Appl. Math. 4: 229-267.
Snokes, J.A. 2003. FOCMEC: FOCal MEChanism. Determinations. InInternational Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, ed.W.H.K. Lee, P. Jennings, C. Kisslinger, and H. Kanamori, Chap. 85.12, 29-30.New York: Elsevier.
Vavrycuk, V. 2001. Inversion for Parameters of Tensile Earthquakes. J.Geophys. Res. 106 (B8): 16339-16355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000372.
Vavrycuk, V. 2007. On the retrieval of moment tensors from borehole data.Geophys. Prospecting 55 (3): 381-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00624.x.
Walser, D.W. and Roadarmel, W.H. 2012. Integrating Microseismic with SurfaceMicrodeformation Monitoring to Characterize Induced Fractures in the ImmatureEagle Ford Shale. Paper ARMA 12-594 presented at the 46th U.S. RockMechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Chicago, Illinois, 24-27 June.
Walter, W.R. and Brune, J.N. 1993. Spectra of Seismic Radiation from aTensile Crack. J. Geophys. Res. 98 (B3): 4449-4459.
Warpinski, N. 2009. Microseismic Monitoring: Inside and Out. J. PetTech 61 (11): 80-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/118537-PA.
Warpinski, N.R., Branagan, P.T., Engler, B.P. et al. 1997b. Evaluation of aDownhole Tiltmeter Array for Monitoring Hydraulic Fractures. Int. J. RockMech. Min. Sci. 34 (3-4): 318.e1-318.e13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00071-3.
Warpinski, N.R., Branagan, P.T., Peterson, R.E. et al. 1997a. Microseismicand Deformation Imaging of Hydraulic Fracture Growth and Geometry in the C SandInterval, GRI/DOE M-Site Project. Paper SPE 38573 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 5-8 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38573-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Branagan, P.T., Peterson, R.E. et al. 1998a. MappingHydraulic Fracture Growth and Geometry Using Microseismic Events Detected by aWireline Retrievable Accelerometer Array. Paper SPE 40014 presented at the SPEGas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15-18 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/40014-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Branagan, P.T., Peterson, R.E. et al. 1998b. AnInterpretation of M-Site Hydraulic Fracture Diagnostic Results. Paper SPE 39950presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-Permeability ReservoirsSymposium, Denver, Colorado, 5-8 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39950-MS.
Warpinski, N.R. and Du, J. 2010. Source-Mechanism Studies on MicroseismicityInduced by Hydraulic Fracturing. Paper SPE 135254 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19-22 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/135254-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Du, J., and Zimmer, U. 2012. Measurements ofHydraulic-Fracture-Induced Seismicity in Gas Shales. Paper SPE 151597 presentedat the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas,6-8 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/151597-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Wolhart, S.L., and Wright, C.A. 2004. Analysis andPrediction of Microseismicity Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing. SPE J. 9 (1): 24-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71649-PA.
Warpinski, N.R., Wright, T.B., Uhl, J.E. et al. 1996. MicroseismicMonitoring of the B-Sand Hydraulic Fracture Experiment at the DOE/GRIMulti-Site Project. Paper SPE 36450 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36450-MS.
Zoback, M.D., Kohli, A., Das, I. et al. 2012. The Importance of Slow Slip onFaults During Hydraulic Fracturing Stimulation of Shale Gas Reservoirs. PaperSPE 155476 presented at the SPE Americas Unconventional Resources Conference,Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 5-7 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/155476-MS.
Not finding what you're looking for? Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.
The SEG Wiki
The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.