Validation of Predicted Cumulative Sand and Sand Rate Against Physical-Model Test
- Hossein Rahmati (University of Alberta) | Alireza Nouri (University of Alberta) | Hans Vaziri (BP America) | Dave Chan (University of Alberta)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- September 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 403 - 410
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 2.2.2 Perforating, 2 Well Completion, 3.2.5 Produced Sand / Solids Management and Control
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 483 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper presents a numerical model to study the onset and rate of sand production and compares its predictions against physical-model testing data on Salt Wash South (SWS) sandstone. A reliable sand-prediction tool is essential in sand-production management. It enables engineers to improve well-completion design, with the aim of maximizing well productivity without compromising well integrity.
A sanding test on a weakly consolidated sandstone sample was numerically simulated using a finite-difference-based numerical model. The model is based on erosional mechanics in which coupling between fluid flow and mechanical deformation captures some of the key mechanisms that are involved in sand production. Sand is assumed to be produced when the material is fully degraded and hydrodynamic forces are high enough to remove the particles.
The outcome of the numerical model shows a reasonable agreement against perforation-test results in terms of the onset and rate of sand production. The model shows that sand production initiates from the perforation tip and propagates to the top and sides of the perforation cavity. The sanding rate increases at higher flow rates. Furthermore, the model predicts external deformations of the sample, which are in close agreement with the experimental observations.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||8|
Bazant, Z.P. and Oh, B.H. 1984. Crack band theory for fracture of concrete.Mater. Struct. 16 (93): 155-177.
Crook, T., Willson, S., Yu, J.G., and Owen, R. 2003. Computational modellingof the localized deformation associated with borehole breakout in quasi-brittlematerials. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 38 (3-4): 177-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0920-4105(03)00031-7.
Das, B.M. 1985. Advanced Soil Mechanics, international edition.London: McGraw-Hill.
Desai, C.S. 2001. Mechanics of Materials and Interfaces: The DisturbedState Concept, 483. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
Detournay, C., Tan, C., and Wu, B. 2006. Modeling the Mechanism andRate of Sand Production Using FLAC. In Numerical Modeling inGeomechanics--2006, ed. R. Hart and P. Varona, Paper No. 08-10.Minneapolis, Minnesota: Itasca Consulting Group.
Elkins, L.F., Morton, D., and Blackwell, W.A. 1972. Experimental Firefloodin a Very Viscous Oil-Unconsolidated Sand Reservoir, S.E. Pauls Valley Field,Oklahoma. Paper SPE 4086 presented at the Fall Meeting of the Society ofPetroleum Engineers of AIME, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 8-11 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4086-MS.
ICG. 2006. FLAC (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in Two Dimensions),Version 5.00. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Itasca Consulting Group (ICG).
Nouri, A. 2004. A Comprehensive Approach to Modelling and EliminatingSanding Problems during Oil Production. PhD dissertation, DalhousieUniversity, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Nouri, A., Kuru, E., and Vaziri, H. 2009. Elastoplastic Modelling of SandProduction Using Fracture Energy Regularization Method. J Can PetTechnol 48 (4): 64-71. PETSOC-09-04-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/09-04-64.
Nouri, A., Vaziri, H., Kuru, E., and Islam, R. 2006. A comparison of twosanding criteria in a physical and numerical modeling of sand production. J.Pet. Sci. Eng. 50 (1): 55-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.10.003.
Papamichos, E., Vardoulakis, I., Tronvoll, J., and Skjærstein, A. 2001.Volumetric sand production model and experiment. Int. J. Numer. Anal.Methods Geomech. 25 (8): 789-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nag.154.
Papamichos, E. and Vardoulakis, I. 2005. Sand erosion with a porositydiffusion law. Comput. Geotech. 32 (1): 47-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.11.005.
Saucier, R.J. 1974. Considerations in Gravel Pack Design. J PetTechnol 26 (2): 205-212. SPE-4030-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4030-PA.
Sulem, J., Vardoulakis, I., Papamichos, E., Oulahna, A., and Tronvoll,J. 1999. Elasto-plastic modelling of Red Wildmoor sandstone. Mechanics ofCohesive-Frictional Materials 4 (3): 215-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199905)4:3<215::AID-CFM61>3.3.CO;2-#.
Tremblay, B., Sedgwick, G., and Vu, D. 1999. CT Imaging of Wormhole GrowthUnder Solution-Gas Drive. SPE Res Eval & Eng 2 (1):37-45. SPE-54658-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/54658-PA.
Vardoulakis, I., Stavropoulou, M., and Papanastasiou, P. 1996.Hydro-mechanical aspects of the sand production problem. Transport PorousMedia 22 (2): 225-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01143517.
Vermeer, P.A. and de Borst, R. 1984. Non-Associated Plasticity for Soils,Concrete and Rock. HERON 29 (3): 3-64.