The Viscosity of Silica Nanoparticle Dispersions in Permeable Media
- Cigdem Metin (University of Texas at Austin) | Roger Bonnecaze (University of Texas at Austin) | Quoc Nguyen (University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- July 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 327 - 332
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 5.6.5 Tracers
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 1,106 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
The potential application of nanoparticle dispersions as formation-stimulation agents, contrast agents, or simply as tracers in the upstream oil and gas industry requires knowledge of the flow properties of these nanoparticles. The modeling of nanoparticle transport in hydrocarbon reservoirs requires a comprehensive understanding of the rheological behavior of these nanofluids. Silica nanoparticles have been commonly used because of their low-cost fabrication and cost-effective surface modification. The aqueous silica-nanoparticle dispersions show Newtonian behavior under steady shear measurements controlled by a rheometer, as discussed by Metin et al. (2011b). The viscosity of nanoparticle dispersions depends strongly on the particle concentration, and that this correlation can be depicted by a unified rheological model (Metin et al. 2011b). In addition, during flow in permeable media, the variation of shear associated with complex pore morphology and the interactions between the nanoparticles and tortuous flow channels can affect the viscosity of nanoparticle dispersion. The latter is particularly important if the concentration of nanoparticles in dispersion may change because of nanoparticle adsorption on mineral/fluid and oil/water interfaces or by mechanical trapping of nanoparticles. In this paper, the flow of silicananoparticle dispersions through different permeable media is investigated. The rheological behaviors of the dispersions are compared with those determined by use of a rheometer. We established a correlation between the nanoparticle concentration and dispersion viscosity in porous media for various nanoparticle sizes. The effects of pore structure and shear rate are also studied. We have confirmed that the concept of effective maximum packing fraction can be applied to describe the viscosity of aqueous nanoparticle dispersions in both bulk flow and flow in porous media with high permeability and regular pore structures, but not at low permeability because of mechanical trapping. Our work provides new insight to engineering nanoparticle rheology for subsurface applications.
|File Size||308 KB||Number of Pages||6|
Biggs, M.J., Humby, S.J., Buts, A., et al. 2003. Explicit NumericalSimulation of Suspension Flow with Deposition in Porous Media: Influence ofLocal Flow Field Variation on Deposition Processes Predicted by TrajectoryMethods. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (7): 1271-1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00555-9.
Caldelas, F., Murphy, M., Huh, C., et al. 2011. Factors Governing Distanceof Nanoparticle Propagation in Porous Media. Paper SPE 142305 paper presentedat SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 27-29March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/142305-MS.
Chong, J.S., Christiansen, E.B. and Baer, A.D. 1971. Rheology ofConcentrated Suspensions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 15 (8): 2007-2021.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.1971.070150818.
Civan, F. 2007. Reservoir Formation Damage: Fundamentals, Modeling,Assessment, and Mitigation. Burlington, Massachusetts: Gulf ProfessionalPublishing.
Gu, C.-Y., Di, Q.-F. and Fang, H.-P. 2007. Slip Velocity Model of PorousWalls Absorbed by Hydrophobic Nanoparticles SiO2. J. Hydrodyn. 19 (3): 365-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(07)60071-7.
Ju, B., Fan, T. and Ma, M. 2006. Enhanced Oil Recovery by Flooding WithHydrophilic Nanoparticles. China Part. 4 (1): 41-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60232-2.
Lake, L.W. 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery. Upper Saddle River, NewJersey: Prentice Hall.
Lazouskaya, V., Jin, Y. and Or, D. 2006. Interfacial Interactions andColloid Retention Under Steady Flows in a Capillary Channel. J. ColloidInterface Sci. 303 (1): 171-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.071.
Lazouskaya, V. and Jin, Y. 2008. Colloid Retention at Air-Water Interface ina Capillary Channel. Colloids Surface A 325 (3): 141-151.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.04.053.
LeCoanet, H.F., Bottero, J-Y. and Wiesner, M.R. 2004. Laboratory Assessmentof the Mobility of Nanomaterials in Porous Media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (19): 5164-5169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0352303.
Metin, C.O., Baran, J.R. Jr., Nguyen, Q.P. 2011a. Adsorption of SurfaceFunctionalized Silica Nanoparticles onto Mineral Surfaces and Decane/WaterInterface, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Pet. Chem. 56(2), ACS conference, Denver.
Metin, C.O., Bonnecaze, R.T. and Nguyen, Q.P. 2011b. Shear Rheology ofSilica Nanoparticle Dispersions. App. Rheol. 21 (1):13146.http://dx.doi.org/10.3933/ApplRheol-21-13146.
Rodriguez, E., Roberts, M.R., Yu, H., et al. 2009. Enhanced Migration ofSurface-Treated Nanoparticles in Sedimentary Rocks. Paper SPE 124418 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana,4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124418-MS.
Sen, T.K., Shanbhag, S. and Khilar, K.C. 2004. Subsurface Colloids inGroundwater Contamination: A Mathematical Model. Colloid Surface A 232 (1): 29-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2003.10.004.
Sun, L., Lin, J-Z. and Bao, F-B. 2006. Numerical Simulation on theDeposition of Nanoparticles Under Laminar Conditions. J. Hydrodyn. 18 (6): 676-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(07)60006-7.
Zhang, T., Espinosa, D.A., Yoon, K. Y., et al. 2011. EngineeredNanoparticles as Harsh-Condition Emulsion and Foam Stabilizers and as NovelSensors. Paper OTC 21212 presented at the Offshore Technology Conference,Houston, Texas, 2-5 May.