Application of Multirate Well Tests to Scale Management: Part 2--Interpretation of MRTs With Known Produced-Water Origin
- Tore Tjomsland (Statoil ASA) | Bernt Sandøy (Statoil ASA) | Finn H. Fadnes (Statoil ASA) | Ross A. McCartney (Oilfield Water Services)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 327 - 336
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.8 Formation Damage, 3.2.2 Downhole intervention and remediation (including wireline and coiled tubing), 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 4.3.4 Scale
- Well testing, Production logging, Water analysis, Scale management
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 470 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Several multirate separator tests (MRTs) have been undertaken on wells in the Veslefrikk field that are on commingled production from the Brent Group and Intra Dunlin Sand (IDS). During these tests, produced-water (PW) samples were also collected. Integrated analysis of the results of interpretion of the PW analyses and the MRT results has provided a range of information for each production zone, including the nature and composition of the PW, the seawater fraction of these produced waters, the fraction of total water flow being produced, pressure, productivity index, oil and water rates, and water cut. This information can reduce the need for running production-logging tools (PLTs), allows the scaling potential between the deeper and the shallower zones to be evaluated, aids squeeze-treatment design, is beneficial for predicting formation damage from crossflow, and aids water-shutoff decisions.
In an accompanying paper, McCartney et al. (2011) describe how PW analyses from the MRT are interpreted to determine--among other parameters--the amount of water produced from each zone (water allocation) at each of the test rates during an MRT. In this paper, the methods of analyzing these results in combination with separator-test data are described with the aid of a field example to demonstrate how they provide detailed information about the downhole conditions and zone properties of the well. On the basis of the analysis, a set of well interventions was recommended. Following confirmation of the principal MRT results by a PLT, some of the recommended interventions have been performed successfully. Experience from Veslefrikk suggests that MRTs can be considered as a possible replacement for running PLTs or as an additional source of more-frequent data.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Earlougher Jr., R.C. 1977. Advances in Well Test Analysis, Vol. 5.New York: SPE/AIME.
Graham, A.L., Boak, L.S., Neville, A., and Sorbie, K.S. 2005. How MinimumInhibitor Concentration (MIC) and Sub-MIC Concentrations Affect BulkPrecipitation and Surface Scaling Rates. Paper SPE 93311 presented at the SPEInternational Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 2-4 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93311-MS.
Kappa. 2009. Emeraude 2.50 Production Logging Interpretation SoftwareTutorial Manuals. Sophia Antipolis, France: Kappa Petroleum Exploration &Production.
McCartney, R., Tjomsland, T., Sandøy, B., and Fadnes, F.H. 2011. Applicationof Multirate Tests to Scale Management: Part 1--Interpretation ofProduced-Water Analyses. SPE Prod & Oper. SPE-131011-PA (in press;posted 27 July 2011).
Petex. 2009. Integrated Production Modelling (IPM) 7.0 Product Manuals.Houston, Texas: Petroleum Experts.
Petrotech. 2003. MultiScale™ Version 6.1 User Manual. Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia: Petrotech Knowledge AS.
Selle, O.M., Springer, M., Auflem, I.H., et al. 2008. Gelled Scale InhibitorTreatment for Improved Placement in Long Horizontal Wells at Norne and HeidrunFields. Paper SPE 112464 presented at the SPE Symposium and Exhibition onFormation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 13-15 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/112464-MS.
Tjomsland, T., Grotle, M.N., and Vikane, O. 2001. Scale ControlStrategy and Economical Consequences of Scale at Veslefrikk. Paper SPE 68308presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 30-31January. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/68308-MS.
Tjomsland, T., Sæten, J.O., Vikane, O., Zettlitzer, M., and Chen, P.2008. Veslefrikk Scale Control Strategy and Economic Implications: Revisited 7Years Later--Did We Improve? Paper SPE 114086 presented at the SPEInternational Oilfield Scale Conference, Aberdeen, 28-29 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/114086-MS.
Tjomsland, T., Sandoey, B., Fadnes, F.H., and McCartney, R.A. 2010.Application of Multi-Rate Well Tests to Scale Management. Paper SPE 131011presented at the SPE International Conference on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen,26-27 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/131011-MS.