Microseismic Clouds: Modeling and Implications
- Ian D. Palmer (Higgs-Palmer Technologies) | Zissis Moschovidis (PCM Technical) | Aaron A. Schaefer (Aetman Engineering)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- April 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 181 - 190
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5.3.4 Integration of geomechanics in models, 3 Production and Well Operations
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 748 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Microseismic measurements provide qualitative information about the location of a fracture stimulation. However, there is also quantitative information to consider, a fact that has largely been neglected. We have developed a geomechanical model to predict the extent of shear failure during fracture stimulation of a well. The model identifies different types of failures, tensile and shear, which will occur on natural fractures or vertical planes of weakness. It is a "screening model," meaning it takes a global perspective where point-by-point details of natural fracture distribution, fluid leakoff, and failure prediction are not emphasized. By matching the model to the extent of the microseismic cloud of shear failure, we obtain an injection permeability and porosity which characterize the volume of the microseismic cloud, which we assume to be a quasi-uniform fracture network with a system permeability enhancement. The model can be applied to any formation in which the microseismic distribution in each fracture stage is widespread, as happens in many tight shales (i.e., not elongated, as in a dominant vertical fracture).
From our modeling studies, a high injection permeability (> 100 md) is required to pressure the formation and achieve failure out as far as the microseismic events extend. Low injection porosity ( < 0.1%) is required for the fracture fluid to leak off that far (this is typically much less than formation porosity of 3-5%). These numbers are symptomatic of fracture-controlled flow. Reports on interference with offset wells support this interpretation. As a case history, the method and results for sequential stimulation of two sister horizontal wells in the Barnett shale are described. The geomechanical model is matched to the composite cloud of all microseismic events measured in that well. Not all wells in a field have microseismic data, but the first few wells usually do, and modeling of these cases can provide useful directives for future wells. For example, the injection permeability can provide information on average fracture spacing and aperture width during injection, and these can be important for tailoring proppant size to acess the fracture network in gas and oil plays in tight shales.
|File Size||721 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Barree, R.D. and Conway, M.W. 2001. Proppant Holdup, Bridging,and Screenout Behavior in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Presented at the SPEProduction and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 24-27 March.SPE-67298-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/67298-MS.
Britt, L.K. and Smith, M.B. 2009. Horizontal Well Completion,Stimulation Optimization, and Risk Mitigation. Presented at the SPE EasternRegional Meeting, Charleston, West Virginia, USA, 23-25 September.SPE-125526-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/125526-MS.
Cipolla, C.L. 2009. Modeling Production and Evaluating FracturePerformance in Unconventional Gas Reservoirs. J Pet Technol 61 (9): 84-90. SPE-118536-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/118536-MS.
Cipolla, C.L., Weng, X., Mack, M.G. et al. 2011. IntegratingMicroseismic Mapping and Complex Fracture Modeling to Characterize HydraulicFracture Complexity. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing TechnologyConference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 24-26 January. SPE-140185-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140185-MS.
Cipolla, C.L., Williams, M.J., Weng, X. et al. 2010. HydraulicFracture Monitoring to Reservoir Simulation: Maximizing Value. Presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19-22September. SPE-133877-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/133877-MS.
Coulter, G.R., Benton, E.G., and Thomson, C.L. 2004. Water Fracs and SandQuality: A Barnett Shale Example. Presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. SPE-90891-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/90891-MS.
Fisher, M.K., Wright, C.A., Davidson, B.M. et al. 2002.Integrating Fracture Mapping Technologies to Optimize Stimulations in theBarnett Shale. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29 September-2 October. SPE-77441-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/77441-MS.
Fredd, C.N., McConnell, S.B., Boney, C.L. et al. 2001.Experimental Study of Fracture Conductivity for Water-Fracturing andConventional Fracturing Applications. SPE J. 6 (3):288-298. SPE-74138-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/74138-PA.
Harpel, J.M., Barker, L.B., Fontenot, J.M. et al. 2012. Case History of theFayetteville Shale Completions. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic FracturingTechnology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 6-8 February. SPE-152621-MS.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/152621-MS.
King, G.E., Haile, L., Shuss, J.A. et al. 2008. IncreasingFracture Path Complexity and Controlling Downward Fracture Growth in theBarnett Shale. Presented at the SPE Shale Gas Production Conference, FortWorth, Texas, USA, 16-18 November. SPE-119896-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119896-MS.
Koning, E.J.L. 1985. Fractured Water Injection Wells - Analytical Modellingof Fracture Propagation. Paper SPE-14684-MS available from SPE, Richardson,Texas.
Koning, E.J.L. 1988. Water flooding under fracturing conditions. PhDdissertation, Technical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
Kovalsky, K. 2007. Evolution of Completions: Transition fromVerticals to Horizontals in the Noel Field. Presented at the SPE-AppliedTechnology Workshop on Tight Gas Completions: Technology Applications and BestPractices, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 12-14 December.
Liu, Y., Gadde, P.B., and Sharma, M.M. 2006. Proppant PlacementUsing Reverse-Hybrid Fracs. Presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium,Calgary, 15-17 May. SPE-99580-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99580-MS.
Meyer, B. 2009a. Discrete Fracture Network Methodology. InMeyer Fracturing Simulators User's Guide, seventh edition, Appendix M,887-911. Meyer & Associates, Inc., http://downloads.mfrac.com/pdfs/2009/Meyer%20User%27s%20Guide.pdf.
Meyer, B. 2009b. Mshale. In Meyer Fracturing SimulatorsUser's Guide, seventh edition, Chap. 11, 569-598. Meyer & Associates,Inc., http://downloads.mfrac.com/pdfs/2009/Meyer%20User%27s%20Guide.pdf.
Nagel, N.B., Sanchez, M.A., and Lee, B. 2012. Gas ShaleHydraulic Fracturing: A Numerical Evaluation of the Effect of GeomechanicalParameters. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference,The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 6-8 February. SPE-152192-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/152192-MS.
Olsson, R. and Barton, N. 2001. An improved model forhydromechanical coupling during shearing of rock joints. Int. J. Rock Mech.Min. Sci. 38 (3): 317-329. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00079-4.
Palmer, I. and King, G.E. 2012. Shale Gas Completions, Fracturing andProduction. Society of Petroleum Engineers Training Course (Short Course),offered 2011-2012.
Palmer, I., Cameron, J., Moschovidis, Z. et al. 2009. NaturalFractures Influence Shear Stimulation Direction. Oil Gas J. (23 March/6April 2009): 37-43/45-51.
Palmer, I., Moschovidis, Z., and Cameron, J. 2005. Coal Failureand Consequences for Coalbed Methane Wells. Presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9-12 October. SPE-96872-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/96872-MS.
Palmer, I., Moschovidis, Z., and Cameron, J. 2007. ModelingShear Failure and Stimulation of the Barnett Shale After Hydraulic Fracturing.Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, CollegeStation, Texas, USA, 29-31 January. SPE-106113-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/106113-MS.
Palmer, I.D. and Moschovidis, Z.A. 2010. New Method To Diagnoseand Improve Shale Gas Completions. Presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19-22 September. SPE-134669-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/134669-MS.
Palmer, I.D., Moschovidis, Z.A., and Schaefer, A. 2012. Microseismic Clouds:Modeling and Implications. Presented at the SPE Americas UnconventionalResources Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 5-7 June. SPE-154903-MS.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/154903-MS.
Pearson, M. 2011. Presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October-2 November.
Rahman, M.K., Hossain, M.M., and Rahman, S.S. 2002. A shear-dilation-basedmodel for evaluation of hydraulically stimulated naturally fracturedreservoirs. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 26 (5):469-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nag.208.
Reiss, L.H. 1981. The Reservoir Engineering Aspects ofFractured Formations. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
Roussel, N.P., Manchanda, R., and Sharma, M.M. 2012.Implications of Fracturing Pressure Data Recorded during a HorizontalCompletion on Stage Spacing Design. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic FracturingTechnology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 6-8 February. SPE-152631-MS.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/152631-MS.
University of Texas at Austin. 2012. Rock Fabric Studies. Bureau of EconomicGeology, http://www.beg.utexas.edu/(accessed 2009).
Warpinski, N.R. 2009. Integrating Microseismic Monitoring WithWell Completions, Reservoir Behavior, and Rock Mechanics. Presented at the SPETight Gas Completions Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 15-17 June.SPE-125239-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/125239-MS.
Warpinski, N.R. and Branagan, P.T. 1989. Altered-StressFracturing. J Pet Technol 41 (9): 990-997. SPE-17533-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17533-PA.
Warpinski, N.R., Kramm, R.C., Heinze, J.R. et al. 2005.Comparison of Single- and Dual-Array Microseismic Mapping Techniques in theBarnett Shale. Presented at the SPE Annual Technology Conference andExhibition, Dallas, 9-12 October. SPE 95568. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/95568-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Mayerhofer, M.J., Vincent, M.C. et al. 2008.Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs: Maximizing Network Growth WhileOptimizing Fracture Conductivity. Presented at the SPE UnconventionalReservoirs Conference, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 10-12 February. SPE-114173-MS.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/114173-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Wolhart, S.L., and Wright, C.A. 2004. Analysisand Prediction of Microseismicity Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing. SPEJ. 9 (1): 24-33. SPE-87673-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87673-PA.
Weng, X., Kresse, O., Cohen, C.E. et al. 2011. Modeling ofHydraulic Fracture Network Propagation in a Naturally Fractured Formation.Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands,Texas, USA, 24-26 January. SPE-140253-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140253-MS.
Xu, W., Calvez, J.H.L., and Thiercelin, M.J. 2009b.Characterization of Hydraulically-Induced Fracture Network Using Treatment andMicroseismic Data in a Tight-Gas Sand Formation: A Geomechanical Approach.Presented at the SPE Tight Gas Completions Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA,15-17 June. SPE-125237-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/125237-MS.
Xu, W., Thiercelin, M.J., and Walton, I.C. 2009a.Characterization of Hydraulically-Induced Shale Fracture Network Using AnAnalytical/Semi-Analytical Model. Presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4-7 October. SPE-124697-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124697-MS.
Xu, W., Thiercelin, M.J., Ganguly, U. et al. 2010. Wiremesh: ANovel Shale Fracturing Simulator. Presented at the International Oil and GasConference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, 8-10 June. SPE-132218-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/132218-MS.