Unconventional-Natural-Gas Business: TSR Benchmark and Recommendations for Prudent Management of Shareholder Value
- Ruud Weijermars (Delft University of Technology) | Steve Watson (Ashridge Business School)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Economics & Management
- Publication Date
- October 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 247 - 261
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.8.1 Tight Gas, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 4.3.4 Scale, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 7.1.1 Reserves Replacement, Booking and Auditing, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 4.1.4 Gas Processing, 2 Well Completion, 4.6 Natural Gas
- benchmark unconventional gas business, unconventional gas returns, prudent shareholder value management
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 744 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Stock-listed independents have played a leading role in the development of unconventional natural-gas resources in the United States and Canada. Shareholders have provided up to 57% of the total capital tied up in a representative panel comprising the 20 leading US and Canadian operators. The accumulated equity-financed capital also provided the collateral for the complementary 43% debt financing. Prudent management of shareholder value in unconventional-gas businesses is therefore essential for ensuring security of gas supply, not only in North America, but also in other countries with emergent unconventional gas plays. This study analyzes and benchmarks the working capital cycles in unconventional-gas companies. The working capital and cashflow cycles are compared with those of diversified oil and gas majors. The ability to accumulate retained earnings is generally much lower for unconventional-gas producers than for integrated majors. Unconventional-gas producers tend to grow their share capital by new issues and not from economic value added by profit from business operations. Although little or no asset value is built from economic profit, shareholder returns may still grow for unconventional-gas companies as long as investor expectations remain positive about future earnings. In contrast, shareholder returns in conventional-gas companies come from genuine economic value added in profitable business operations. The root cause of the weakness or absence of operational profits in unconventional-gas operations is a combination of low gas prices and well flow rates that are too modest to pay for the total cost of the unconventional-gas production. The operating margins for unconventional-gas companies are either close to zero or negative, but not for the integrated oil and gas majors, which have impressive cash margins even at globally suppressed gas prices. The benchmarks provided here help one to understand which parameters impact the financial performance of unconventional-natural-gas companies most significantly. Recommendations are formulated to avoid the destruction of shareholder value, and to instead maximize total shareholder returns (TSRs).
|File Size||6 MB||Number of Pages||15|
Andersson, T., Haslam, C., and Lee, E. 2006. Financialized accounts:restructuring and return on capital employed in the S&P 500. AccountingForum 30 (1): 21-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.01.001.
Andersson, T., Haslam, C., Lee, E., and Tsitsianis, N. 2008.Financialization directing strategy. Accounting Forum 32(4): 261-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.08.001.
Berman, A. 2010a. Will shale plays be commercial? Paper presented at theAAPG Geosciences Technology Workshop (GTW), Istanbul, Turkey, 24-26 May.
Berman, A.E. 2010b. Shale Gas--Abundance or Mirage? Why the Marcellus ShaleWill Disappoint Expectations. The Oil Drum (October 28, 2010), http://www.theoildrum.com/node/7075.
Cohen, D. 2009. A Shale Gas Boom? ASPO-USA, http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/06/a-shale-gas-boom/.
Dahl, C.A. 2004. International Energy Markets: Understanding Pricing,Policies, and Profits. Tulsa, Oklahoma: PennWell Corporation.
Dechow, P.M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firmperformance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting andEconomics 18 (1): 3-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90016-7.
Dell, B.P. and Lockshin, N. 2010. Bernstein E&Ps: More pain ahead forthe 45 operators? Report, Bernstein Research, London (June 2010).
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2010a. Key World Energy Statistics 2010.Paris: OECD/IEA.
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2010b. Natural Gas Information 2010.Paris: OECD/IEA.
Jaffe, A.M. 2010. Shale Gas Will Rock the World The Wall StreetJournal (May 10, 2010), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303491304575187880596301668.html.
Knight, H. 2010. Wonderfuel: Welcome to the age of unconventional gas.New Scientist 2764 (17 June 2010): 44-47.
Lewis, R. and Pendrill, D. 1996. Advanced Financial Accounting, fifthedition. London: Pitman Publishing.
Lumby, S. and Jones, C. 2003. Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice,seventh edition. Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning.
Nasta, S. 2010. N. American shale gas output defies breakeven economics:analysts. Platts (12 April 2010), http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/HeadlineNews/NaturalGas/6955265.
Olsen, E., Plaschke, F., and Stelter, D. 2010. Threading the Needle: ValueCreation in a Low-Growth Economy. The 2010 Value Creation Report. BCG Report,The Boston Consulting Group, Boston, Massachusetts (September 2010). http://www.bcg.com/documents/file59590.pdf.
Schaefer, K. 2009. What is the breakeven price for natural gas producers?Resource Investor (30 April 2009), http://www.resourceinvestor.com/News/2009/4/Pages/What-is-the-breakeven-price-for-natural-gas-producers.aspx.
Watson, S. 2010. Developing a shared understanding of value drivers:bridging strategy and finance. 360° - The Ashridge Journal (Summer2010).
Weijermars, R. 2010a. Value chain analysis of the natural gas industry:Lessons from the US regulatory success and opportunities for Europe. J. Nat.Gas Sci. Eng. 2 (2-3): 86-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2010.04.002.
Weijermars, R. 2010b. Bigger is better when it comes to capital markets andoil company liquidity. First Break 28 (6): 37-41. http://fb.eage.org/content.php?section=7&issue=1732&lang=eng.
Weijermars, R. 2010c.Why untenable US natural gas boom may soon needwellhead price-floor regulation for industry survival. First Break28 (9): 33-38.http://fb.eage.org/content.php?section=7&issue=1742&lang=eng.
Weijermars, R. 2011a. Credit Ratings and Cash-Flow Analysis of Oil and GasCompanies: Competitive Disadavantage in Financing Costs for Smaller Companiesin Tight Capital Markets. SPE Econ & Mgmt 3 (2): 54-67.SPE-144489-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/144489-PA.
Weijermars, R. 2011b. Price scenarios may alter gas-to-oil strategy shiftfor US Unconventionals. Oil Gas J. 109 (1): 74-81.
Weijermars, R. 2011c. Security of Supply: Operational Margins at theWellhead and Natural Gas Reserve Maturation. Search and Discovery Article#70106 (2011) adapted from an oral presentation given at the AAPG AnnualConvention and Exhibition, Houston, 10-13 April.
Weijermars, R. 2011d.Critical Drivers of Exploration and ProductionClockspeed. Exploration and Production. Oil & Gas Review 9 (1): 12-17.
Weijermars, R. In press(a). Jumps in Proved Unconventional GasReserves Inventory Present Challenges to Reserves Auditing. SPE Economics& Management (in press; submitted 3 June 2011).
Weijermars, R. In press(b). Underpinning the strategic development ofunconventional gas resources with an instrument for wellhead price-floorregulation (WACORG). Energy Policy (in press; submitted 2011).
Weijermars, R., Drijkoningen, G., Heimovaara, T.J., Rudolph, E.S.J., Weltje,G.J., and Wolf, K.H.A.A. 2011. Unconventional gas research initiative for cleanenergy transition in Europe. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 3 (2):402-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2011.04.002.