Analytical Study of Effects of Flow Rate, Capillarity, and Gravity on CO/Brine Multiphase-Flow System in Horizontal Corefloods
- Chia-Wei Kuo (Stanford University) | Sally M. Benson (Stanford University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- April 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 708 - 720
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.2.3 Rock properties, 4.3.4 Scale, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 410 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
This paper presents an approximate semianalytical solution for predicting the average steady-state saturation during multiphase coreflood experiments across a wide range of capillary and gravity numbers. Recently, the influences of flow rate, gravity, and subcore heterogeneity on brine displacement efficiency have been studied with the 3D simulator TOUGH2 (Kuo et al. 2010). These studies have demonstrated that the average saturation depends on the capillary and gravity numbers in a predictable way.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a simple and approximate semianalytical solution for predicting the average saturation (during two-phase coreflood experiments across a wide range of flow rates) for different average rock properties and fluid pairs. A 2D analysis of the governing equations for the multiphase-flow system at steady state is used to develop the approximate semianalytical solution. We have developed a new criterion to identify the viscous-dominated regime at the core scale. Variations of interfacial tension (IFT), core permeability, and length of the core and the effects of buoyancy, capillary, and viscous forces are all accounted for in the semianalytical solutions. We also have shown that three dimensionless numbers (NB, Ngv, Rl) and two critical gravity numbers (Ngv,c1, Ngv,c2) are required to properly capture the balance of viscous, gravity, and capillary forces. There is good agreement between the average saturations calculated from the 3D simulations and the analytical model. This new model can be used to design and interpret multiphase-flow coreflood experiments, gain better understanding of multiphase-flow displacement efficiency across a wide range of conditions and for different fluid pairs, and perhaps even provide a tool for studying the influence of subgrid-scale multiphase-flow phenomena on reservoir-scale simulations.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Avraam, D.G. and Payatakes, A.C. 1995. Generalized Relative PermeabilityCoefficients During Steady-State Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media, andCorrelation With the Flow Mechanisms. Transp. Porous Med. 20: 135-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00616928.
Buckley, S.E. and Leverett, M.C. 1942. Mechanism of Fluid Displacement inSands. Trans. AIME 146 (1): 107-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/942107-G.
Cinar, Y., Jessen, K., Berenblyum, R. et al. 2006. An Experimental andNumerical Investigation of Crossflow Effects in Two-Phase Displacements. SPEJ. 11 (2): 216-226. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2118/90568-PA.
Fulcher Jr., R.A., Ertekin, T., and Stahl, C.D. 1985. Effect of CapillaryNumber and Its Constituents on Two-Phase Relative Permeability Curves. J.Pet Tech 37 (2): 249-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12170-PA.
Hussain, F., Cinar,Y., and Bedrikovetsky, P. 2012. A Semianalytical Modelfor Two-Phase Immiscible Flow in Porous Media Honoring Capillary Pressure.Transp. Porous Med. 92 (1): 187-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-011-9897-4.
Jonoud, S. and Jackson, M.D. 2008. New Criteria for the Validity ofSteady-State Upscaling. Transp. Porous Med. 71 (1):53-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-007-9111-x.
Kopp, A., Class, H., and Helmig, R. 2009. Investigations on CO2Storage Capacity in Saline Aquifers--Part 1: Dimensional Analysis of FlowProcesses and Reservoir Characteristics. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control3 (3): 263-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.10.002.
Krause, M.H., Perrin, J.-C., and Benson, S.M. 2011. Modeling PermeabilityDistributions in a Sandstone Core for History-Matching Coreflood Experiments.SPE J. 16 (4): 768-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/126340-PA.
Krevor, S.C.M., Pini, R., Li, B. et al. 2011. Capillary HeterogeneityTrapping of CO2 in a Sandstone Rock at Reservoir Conditions.Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 (15): L15401.http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048239.
Kuo, C.-W, Perrin, J.-C., and Benson, S.M. 2010. Effect of Gravity, FlowRate, and Small-Scale Heterogeneity on Multiphase Flow of CO2 andBrine. Paper SPE 132607 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anaheim,California, 27-29 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/132607-MS.
Lake, L.W. 1988, Enhanced Oil Recovery. Old Tappan, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
Lenormand, R., Touboul, E., and Zarcone, C. 1988. Numerical Models andExperiments on Immiscible Displacements in Porous Media. J. Fluid Mech. 189 (1): 165-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022112088000953.
Nordbotten, J.M., Celia, M.A., and Bachu, S. 2005. Injection and Storage ofCO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers: Analytical Solution for CO2Plume Evolution During Injection. Transp. Porous Med. 58:339-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-004-0670-9.
Perrin, J.-C. and Benson, S.M. 2010. An Experimental Study on the Influenceof Subcore Scale Heterogeneities on CO2 Distribution in ReservoirRocks. Transp. Porous Med. 82 (1): 93-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9426-x.
Perrin, J.-C., Krause, M., Kuo, C.-W. et al. 2009. Core-Scale ExperimentalStudy of Relative Permeability Properties of CO2 and Brine inReservoir Rocks. Energy Procedia 1 (1): 3515-3522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.144.
Pickup, G.E. and Stephen, K.D. 2000. An Assessment of Steady-State Scale-Upfor Small-Scale Geological Models. Pet. Geosci. 6 (3):203-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.6.3.203.
Pini, R., Krevor, S.C.M., and Benson, S. 2012. Capillary Pressure andHeterogeneity for the CO2/Water System in Sandstone Rocks atReservoir Conditions. Adv. Water Resour. 38: 48-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.12.007.
Pruess, K. 2005. ECO2N: A TOUGH2 Fluid Property Module for Mixtures ofWater, NaCl, and CO2. Report LBNL-57952. Berkeley, California: LawrenceBerkeley National Laboratory.
Pruess, K., Oldenburg, C.M., and Moridis, G.J. 1999. TOUGH2 User's Guide,Version 2.0. LBNL-43134. Berkeley, California: Lawrence Berkeley NationalLaboratory.
Rossen, W.R. and van Duijn, C.J. 2004. Gravity Segregation in Steady-StateHorizontal Flow in Homogeneous Reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 43(1): 99-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2004.01.004.
Shi, J.-Q., Xue, Z., and Durucan, S. 2011. Supercritical CO2 CoreFlooding and Imbibition in Tako Sandstone--Influence of Subcore ScaleHeterogeneity. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 5 (1): 75-87.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.07.003.
Silin, D., Patzek, T., and Benson, S.M. 2009. A Model of Buoyancy-DrivenTwo-Phase Countercurrent Fluid Flow. Transp. Porous Med. 76: 449-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-008-9257-1.
Silin, D., Tomutsa, L., Benson, S.M. et al. 2011. Microtomography andPore-Scale Modeling of Two-Phase Fluid Distribution. Transp. Porous Med. 86 (2): 495-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-010-9636-2.
Skauge, A., Haskjold, G., Thorsen, T. et al. 1997. Accuracy of Gas-OilRelative Permeability From Two-Phase Flow Experiments. Paper SCA-9707 presentedat the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysis, Calgary,Canada, 10-13 September.
Skauge, A. and Poulsen, S. 2000. Rate Effects on Centrifuge DrainageRelative Permeability. Paper SPE 63145 presented at the SPE TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 1-4 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/63145-MS.
Virnovsky, G.A., Friis, H.A., and Lohne, A. 2004. A Steady-State UpscalingApproach for Immiscible Two-Phase Flow. Transp. Porous Med. 54 (2): 167-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026363132351.
Zhang, K., Wu, Y.-S., Ding, C. et al. 2003. TOUGH2_MP: A Parallel Version ofTOUGH2. Paper presented at TOUGH Symposium, Berkeley, California, 12-14May.
Zhou, D., Fayers, F.J., and Orr Jr., F.M. 1994. Scaling of Multiphase Flowin Simple Heterogeneous Porous Media. SPE Res Eng 12 (3):173-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/27833-PA.