Please enable JavaScript for this site to function properly.
OnePetro
  • Help
  • About us
  • Contact us
Menu
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Log in / Register

Log in to your subscription

and
Advanced search Show search help
  • Full text
  • Author
  • Company/Institution
  • Publisher
  • Journal
  • Conference
Boolean operators
This OR that
This AND that
This NOT that
Must include "This" and "That"
This That
Must not include "That"
This -That
"This" is optional
This +That
Exact phrase "This That"
"This That"
Grouping
(this AND that) OR (that AND other)
Specifying fields
publisher:"Publisher Name"
author:(Smith OR Jones)

A Semianalytic Solution for Flow in Finite-Conductivity Vertical Fractures by Use of Fractal Theory

Authors
Manuel Cossio (Texas A&M University) | George Moridis (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) | Thomas A Blasingame (Texas A&M University)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/153715-PA
Document ID
SPE-153715-PA
Publisher
Society of Petroleum Engineers
Source
SPE Journal
Volume
18
Issue
01
Publication Date
January 2013
Document Type
Journal Paper
Pages
83 - 96
Language
English
ISSN
1086-055X
Copyright
2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Disciplines
3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 5.8.6 Naturally Fractured Reservoir
Downloads
4 in the last 30 days
934 since 2007
Show more detail
View rights & permissions
SPE Member Price: USD 12.00
SPE Non-Member Price: USD 35.00

Summary

The exploitation of unconventional reservoirs complements the practice of hydraulic fracturing, and with an ever-increasing demand in energy, this practice is set to experience significant growth in the coming years. Sophisticated analytic models are needed to accurately describe fluid flow in a hydraulic fracture, and the problem has been approached from different directions in the past 3 decades--starting with the work of Gringarten et al. (1974) for an infinite-conductivity case, followed by contributions from Cinco-Ley et al. (1978), Lee and Brockenbrough (1986), Ozkan and Raghavan (1991), and Blasingame and Poe (1993) for a finite-conductivity case. This topic remains an active area of research and, for the more-complicated physical scenarios such as multiple transverse fractures in ultratight reservoirs, answers are currently being sought.

Starting with the seminal work of Chang and Yortsos (1990), fractal theory has been successfully applied to pressure-transient testing, although with an emphasis on the effects of natural fractures in pressure/rate behavior. In this paper, we begin by performing a rigorous analytical and numerical study of the fractal diffusivity equation (FDE), and we show that it is more fundamental than the classic linear and radial diffusivity equations. Thus, we combine the FDE with the trilinear flow model (Lee and Brockenbrough 1986), culminating in a new semianalytic solution for flow in a finite-conductivity vertical fracture that we name the "fractal-fracture solution (FFS)." This new solution is instantaneous and comparable in accuracy with the Blasingame and Poe solution (1993). In addition, this is the first time that fractal theory is used in fluid flow in a porous medium to address a problem not related to reservoir heterogeneity. Ultimately, this project is a demonstration of the untapped potential of fractal theory; our approach is flexible, and we believe that the same methodology could be extended to different applications.

One objective of this work is to develop a fast and accurate semianalytical solution for flow in a single vertical fracture that fully penetrates a homogeneous infinite-acting reservoir. This would be the first time that fractal theory is used to study a problem that is not related to naturally fractured reservoirs or reservoir heterogeneity. In addition, as part of the development process, we revisit the fundamentals of fractals in reservoir engineering and show that the underlying FDE possesses some interesting qualities that have not yet been comprehensively addressed in the literature.

File Size  998 KBNumber of Pages   14

References

Abdassah, D. and Ershaghi, I. 1986. Triple Porosity Systems for RepresentingNaturally Fractured Reservoirs. SPE Form Eval  1 (2):113-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13409-PA.

Acuña, J.A., Ershaghi, I., and Yortsos, Y.C. 1995. Practical Application ofFractal Pressure-Transient Analysis in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. SPEForm Eval  10 (3): 173-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24705-PA.

Beier, R.A. 1994. Pressure-Transient Model for a Vertically Fractured Wellin a Fractal Reservoir. SPE Form Eval  9 (2): 122-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20582-PA.

Blasingame, T.A. 2010a. Petroleum Engineering 620—Fluid Flow in PetroleumReservoirs- Reservoir Flow Solutions-Linear Flow Solutions: Infinite andFinite-Acting Reservoir Cases. College Station, Texas: Texas A&MUniversity.

Blasingame, T.A. 2010b. Petroleum Engineering 620—Fluid Flow in PetroleumReservoirs- Reservoir Flow Solutions-Solution of the Radial Flow DiffusivityEquation. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University.

Blasingame, T.A. and Poe, B.D. 1993. Semi-analytic Solutions for a Well witha Single Finite-Conductivity Vertical Fracture. Paper SPE 26424 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 3-6October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/26424-MS.

Bowman, F. 1958. Introduction to Bessel Functions. New York: DoverPublications.

Camacho-Velazquez, R., Fuentes-Cruz, G., and Vasquez-Cruz, M. 2008.Decline-Curve Analysis of Fractured Reservoirs with Fractal Geometry. SPERes Eval & Eng 11 (3): 606-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/104009-PA.

Camacho-Velazquez, R., Vasquez-Cruz, M., Castrejón-Aivar, R. et al. 2005.Pressure-Transient and Decline-Curve Behaviors in Naturally Fractured VuggyCarbonate Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng  8 (2): 95-112.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/77689-PA.

Chang, J., Yortsos, Y., and Yanis, C. 1990. Pressure Transient Analysis ofFractal Reservoirs. SPE Form Eval  5 (1): 31-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18170-PA.

Chapman, S.J. 2008. Fortran 95/2003 for Scientists and Engineers,third edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Cinco-Ley, H. and Meng, H.-Z. 1988. Pressure Transient Analysis of Wellswith Finite Conductivity Vertical Fractures in Dual Porosity Reservoirs. PaperSPE 18172 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Houston, Texas, 2-5 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18172-MS.

Cinco-Ley, H., Samaniego, F., and Dominguez, A. 1978. Transient PressureBehavior for a Well with a Finite-Conductivity Vertical Fracture SPE J. 18 (4): 253-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6014-PA.

Clarkson, C.R., Nobakht, M., Kaviani, D. et al. 2012. Production Analysis ofTight-Gas and Shale-Gas Reservoirs Using the Dynamic-Slippage Concept. SPEJ.  17 (1): 230-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/144317-PA.

Cossio, M. 2012. A Semi-Analytic Solution for Flow in Finite-ConductivityVertical Fractures Using Fractal Theory. MS Thesis, Texas A&M University,College Station, Texas.

Flamenco-Lopez, F. and Camacho-Velazquez, R. 2003. Determination of FractalParameters of Fracture Networks Using Pressure-Transient Data. SPE Res Eval& Eng  6 (1): 39-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/82607-PA.

Franquet, M., Wattenbarger, R.A., Ibrahim, M. et al. 2004. Effect ofPressure-Dependent Permeability in Tight Gas Reservoirs, Transient Radial Flow.Paper PETSOC 2004-089 presented at the Canadian International PetroleumConference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 8-10 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2004-089.

Fuentes-Cruz, G., Camacho-Velazquez, R., and Vasquez-Cruz, M. 2010. AUnified Approach for Falloff and Buildup Tests Analysis Following a ShortInjection/Production Time. Paper SPE 133539 presented at the SPE WesternRegional Meeting, Anaheim, California, 27-29 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/133539-MS.

Gringarten, A.C., Ramey, H.J., and Raghavan, R 1974. Unsteady-State PressureDistributions Created by a Well with a Single Infinite-Conductivity VerticalFracture. SPE J.  14 (4): 347-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4051-PA.

Kong, X.Y., Li, D.L., and Lu, D.T. 2009. Transient Pressure Analysis inPorous and Fractured Fractal Reservoirs. Sci China Ser E Tech Sci 52 (9): 2700-2708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11431-008-0245-z.

Lee, S.-T. and Brockenbrough, J.R. 1986. A New Approximate Analytic Solutionfor Finite-Conductivity Vertical Fractures. SPE Form Eval  1(1): 75-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12013-PA.

Lee, W.J. and Wattenbarger, R.A. 1996. Gas Reservoir Engineering,first edition. Richardson, Texas: textbook series, SPE

Mathematica, version 8.0. 2010. Champaign, Illinois: Wolfram Research,Inc.

Moré, J.J., Garbow, B.S., and Hillstrom, K.E. 1984. The MINPACK Project. InSources and Development of Mathematical Software (Prentice-Hall Series inComputational Mathematics), ed. W.J. Cowell. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.

Ozkan, E. and Raghavan, R. 1991. New Solutions for Well-Test-AnalysisProblems: Part 1-- Analytical Considerations. SPE Form Eval 6 (3): 359-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18615-PA.

Stehfest, H. 1970. Algorithm 368. Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms[D5]. Communications of the ACM  13 (1): 47-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/361953.361969.

TableCurve 2D, version 5.01. 2012. San Jose, California: Systat Software,Inc.

Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J. 1963. The Behavior of Naturally FracturedReservoirs SPE J. 3 (3): 245-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/426-PA.

Yun, M., Yu, B., and Cai, J. 2009. Analysis of Seepage Characters in FractalPorous Media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 52 (13-14): 3272-3278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.01.024. 

    • Issue Preprint
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
Show more

Other Resources

Looking for more? 

Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.


 


PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume  Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the  Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).








The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Copyright © SPE All rights reserved
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Help
  • Terms of use
  • Publishers
  • Content Coverage
  • Privacy
  Administration log in