"Squimulation"--Simultaneous Well-Stimulation and Scale-Squeeze Treatments in Deepwater West Africa
- David Patterson (Chevron) | Mike Kendrick (Chevron) | Wade Williams (Chevron) | Myles Martin Jordan (Nalco)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- February 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 55 - 66
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 2 Well Completion, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 3 Production and Well Operations, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 2.4.6 Frac and Pack
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 629 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In a deepwater west African field, the relatively small number of high-cost, highly productive wells, coupled with a high barium sulfate scaling tendency (upon waterflood breakthrough of injected seawater) requires effective scale management along with removal of near-wellbore damage in order to achieve high hydrocarbon recovery.
The nature of the well-completion strategy in the field (frac packs for sand control) had resulted in some wells with higher-than-expected skin values owing to drilling fluid losses, residual fracture gel, fluid loss agents, and fines mobilization within the frac packs.
The paper will present how the challenges of managing impaired completions and inorganic scale forced innovation in terms of when to apply both stimulation and scale-inhibitor packages to deepwater wells. This paper will outline a novel process for non-conventional batch chemical applications where bullhead stimulation treatments have been displaced deep into the formation (> 20 ft) using a scale inhibitor overflush. Not only does this benefit the stimulation by displacing the spent acid and reagents away from the immediate wellbore area, but the combined treatment provides a cost savings with a single mobilization for the combined treatment. The paper will describe the laboratory testing that was performed to qualify the treatments. The four field treatments that were performed demonstrate how these coupled applications have proven very effective at both well stimulation/skin reduction and scale-inhibitor placement before and after seawater breakthrough. The term "squimulation" is used by the local operations team to describe this simultaneous squeeze-and-stimulation process.
Many similar fields are currently being developed in the Campos basin (Gulf of Mexico) and west Africa, and this paper presents a good example of best-practice sharing from another oil basin.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Bertero, L., Chierici, G.L., Gottardi, G. et al. 1988. ChemicalEquilibrium Models: Their Use in Simulating the Injection of IncompatibleWaters. SPE Res Eng 3 (1): 288-294. SPE-14126-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14126-PA.
Børeng, R., Sorbie, K.S., and Yuan, M.D. 1994. TheUnderlying Theory and Modelling of Scale Inhibitor Squeezes in Three OffshoreWells on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Proc., Fifth InternationalOilfield Chemicals Symposium, Geilo, Norway, 20-23 March.
Hinrichsen, C.J. 1998. Preventing Scale Deposition in OilProduction Facilities: An Industry Review. Presented at the NACE InternationalCORROSION 98 53rd Annual Conference and Exposition, San Diego, California, USA,22-27 March. Paper No. NACE-98061.
Jacques, D.F. and Bourland, B.I. 1983. A Study of Solubility ofStrontium Sulfate. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 23 (2): 292-300. SPE-9625-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/9625-PA.
Jordan, M.M., Edgerton, M.C., Cole-Hamilton, J. et al. 1998.The Application of Wax Divertor to Allow Successful Scale Inhibitor SqueezeTreatment to Sub Sea Horizontal Wells, North Sea Basin. Presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27-30 September.SPE-49196-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/49196-MS.
Jordan, M.M., Sjuræther, K., and Collins, I.R. 2004. Scale Control withinNorth Sea Chalk/Limestone Reservoirs: The Challenge of Understanding andOptimizing Chemical Placement Methods and Retention Mechanism: Laboratory toField. Presented at the NACE International CORROSION 2004 59th AnnualConference and Exposition, New Orleans, 28 March-1 April. NACE Paper No.04389.
Jordan, M.M., Sorbie, K.S., Griffin, P. et al. 1995. Scale InhibitorAdsorption/Desorption vs. Precipitation: The Potential for Extending SqueezeLife While Minimising Formation Damage. Presented at the SPE European FormationDamage Conference, The Hague, 15-16 May. SPE-30106-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30106-MS.
Jordan, M.M., Sorbie, K.S., Jiang, P. et al. 1994. The Effectof Clay Minerals, pH, Calcium and Temperature on the Adsorption of PhosphonateScale Inhibitor onto Reservoir Core and Mineral Substrates. Presented at theNACE International CORROSION 94 49th Annual Conference and Exposition,Baltimore, Maryland, 28 February-4 March.
Jordan, M.M., Sorbie, K.S., Marulier, M.F. et al. 1997.Implication of Produced Water Chemistry and Formation Mineralogy on InhibitorAdsorption/Desorption in Reservoir Sandstone and their Importance in theCorrect Selection of Scale Squeeze Chemicals. Presented at the 1997 RoyalChemistry Society's Chemistry in the Oil Industry 6th International Symposium,Ambleside, UK, 14-17 April.
King, G.E. and Warden, S.L. 1989. Introductory Work in ScaleInhibitor Squeeze Performance: Core Tests and Field Results. Presented at theSPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 8-10 February.SPE-18485-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18485-MS.
Mackay, E.J. 2003. Predicting in-situ sulphate scale depositionand the impact on produced ion concentrations. Trans IChemE 81 (A): 326-332.
Mackay, E.J. and Jordan, M.M. 2003. SQUEEZE Modelling:Treatment Design and Case Histories. Presented at the SPE European FormationDamage Conference, The Hague, 13-14 May. SPE-82227-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/82227-MS.
Mackay, E.J. and Sorbie, K.S. 2000. Brine Mixing inWaterflooded Reservoirs and the Implications for Scale Prevention. Presented atthe International Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 26-27 May.SPE-60193-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/60193-MS.
Mackay, E.J., Collins, I.R., Jordan, M.M. et al. 2003. PWRI:Scale Formation Risk Assessment and Management. Presented at the InternationalSymposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 29-30 January. SPE-80385-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/80385-MS.
Mackay, E.J., Jordan, M.M., Feasey, N.D. et al. 2004.Integrated Risk Analysis for Scale Management in Deepwater Developments.Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 26-27May. SPE-87459-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87459-MS.
Mackay, E.J., Matharu, A., Sorbie, K.S. et al. 1998. Modellingof Scale Inhibitor Treatments in Horizontal Wells: Application to the AlbaField. Presented at the SPE Formation Damage Control Conference, Lafayette,Louisiana, USA, 18-19 February. SPE-39452-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39452-MS.
Meyers, K.O., Skillman, H.L., and Herring, G.D. 1985.Control of Formation Damage at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, by Inhibitor SqueezeTreatment. J Pet Technol 37 (6): 1019-1034. SPE-12472-PA.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12472-PA.
Oddo, J.E. and Tomson, M.B. 1994. Why Scale Forms and How toPredict It. SPE Prod & Fac 9 (1): 47-54. SPE-21710-PA.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/21710-PA.
Pardue, J.E. 1991. A New Inhibitor for Scale SqueezeApplications. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on OilfieldChemistry, Anaheim, California, USA, 20-22 February. SPE-21023-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/21023-MS.
Patterson, D., Kendrick, M., Riordan, H. et al. 2011. SulfateScale Inhibition Via Stimulation Programs Carried Out During Well Completion,Deepwater, West Africa. Presented at the NACE International CORROSION 2011Annual Conference and Exposition, Houston, 13-17 March. NACE-11347.
Paulo, J. and Mackay, E.J. 2001. Modelling of In-Situ ScaleDeposition. Presented at the 12th International Oil Field Chemistry Symposium,Geilo, Norway, 1-4 April.
Ramstad, K., Tydal, T., Ellersten, E. et al. 1999.Precipitation and Deposition of CaCO3. Laboratory Studies and FieldExperience. Presented at the 1999 NIF Tenth International Oil Field ChemicalsSymposium, Fagernes, Norway, 1-3 March.
Sorbie, K.S. and MacKay, E.J. 2000. Mixing of injected, connateand aquifer brines in waterflooding and its relevance to oilfield scaling.J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 27 (1-2): 85-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(00)00050-4.
Vetter, O.J., Kandarpa, V., and Harouaka, A. 1982.Prediction of Scale Problems Due to Injection of Incompatible Waters. J PetTechnol 34 (2): 273-284. SPE-7794-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/7794-PA.
Vetter, O.J.G. and Phillips, R.C. 1970. Prediction ofDeposition of Calcium Sulfate Scale Under Down-Hole Conditions. J PetTechnol 22 (10): 1299-1308. SPE-2620-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2620-PA.
White, R., Brookley, J., and Menzies, N. 1999. PracticalExperiences of Gel Diversion Technique and an Overview of Scale Management forthe Alba Field. Presented at the SPE Symposium on Oilfield Scale: FieldApplications and Novel Solutions, Aberdeen, Scotland, 27-28 January.