New Analytical and Statistical Approach for Estimating and Analyzing Sand Production Through Plain Square-Mesh Screens During a Sand-Retention Test
- Rajesh A. Chanpura (Schlumberger) | Somnath Mondal (University of Texas at Austin) | Jamie S. Andrews (Statoil) | Anne-Mette Mathisen (Statoil) | Joseph A. Ayoub (Schlumberger) | Mehmet Parlar (Schlumberger) | Mukul M. Sharma (University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- March 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 135 - 147
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.4.4 Screen Selection, 3.2.5 Produced Sand / Solids Management and Control, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 559 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
There are two types of sand-retention tests (SRTs) generally used in the industry to evaluate the performance of sand-control screens for standalone-screen (SAS) applications--prepack tests and slurry tests. They represent complete hole collapse and gradual rock failure around the wellbore, respectively. In this paper, we present analytical models and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to estimate sand production in slurry-type SRTs with square-mesh screens while taking into account the full particle- size distribution (PSD) of the formation sand. We also compare the model results with four sets of experimental data and demonstrate that this approach can be used to predict sand production for different sand-size-distribution/screen-size combinations without the need for physical tests (provided that both an accurate representation of the formation-sand PSD and an accurate representation of screen pore sizes are available). This work augments previously published slurry-test models that were limited to wire-wrapped screens (WWSs), and enables the comparison of the performance of square-mesh screens with WWSs. The analytical model and the MC simulations provide a direct and reliable way to estimate the amount of sand that will be produced for a given sand-size distribution and a given screen size. Because the proposed methods are much more quantitative, they represent a significant improvement that surpasses current methods that rely on single design points or rules of thumb for screen selection.
|File Size||934 KB||Number of Pages||13|
Ballard, T. and Beare, S. 2003. Media Sizing for Premium Sand Screens: DutchTwill Weaves. Paper SPE 82244 presented at the SPE European Formation DamageConference, The Hague, The Netherlands, 13-14 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/82244-MS.
Ballard, T. and Beare, S. 2006. Sand Retention Testing: The More You Do, theWorse It Gets. Paper SPE 98308 presented at the International Symposium andExhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 15-17 February.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/98308-MS.
Ballard, T. and Beare, S. 2012. An Investigation of Sand Retention TestingWith a View To Developing Better Guidelines for Screen Selection. Paper SPE151768 presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on FormationDamage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 15-17 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/151768-MS.
Chanpura, R.A., Fidan, S., Mondal, S. et al. 2012. New Analytical andStatistical Approach for Estimating and Analyzing Sand Production ThroughWire-Wrap Screens During a Sand-Retention Test. SPE Drill & Compl 27 (3): 417-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143731-PA.
Chanpura, R.A., Hodge, R.M., Andrews, J.A. et al. 2011. A Review of ScreenSelection for Stand-Alone Applications and a New Methodology. SPE Drill& Compl 26 (1): 84- 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/127931-PA.
Constien, V. and Skidmore, V. 2006. Stand-Alone Screen Selection UsingPerformance Mastercurves. Paper SPE 98363 presented at the InternationalSymposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana,15-17 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/98363-MS.
Gillespie, G., Deem, C.K., and Malbrel, C. 2000. Screen Selection for SandControl Based on Laboratory Tests. Paper SPE 64398 presented at the SPE AsiaPacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia, 16-18October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/64398-MS.
Larsen, O.S., Fjellstad, V., Mathisen, A.M. et al. 2012. New Sand RetentionTest Setup Exhibits No Plugging Tendencies With Various Screen Types UsingNonuniform Test Sand. Paper SPE 151346 presented at the SPE InternationalSymposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana,15-17 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/151346-MS.
Markestad, P., Christie, O., Espedal, Aa. et al. 1996. Selection of ScreenSlot Width to Prevent Plugging and Sand Production. Paper SPE 31087 presentedat the SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium, Lafayette, Louisiana, 14-15February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/31087-MS.
Mathisen, A.M, Aastveit, G.L., and Alterås, E. 2007. Successful Installationof Standalone Sand Screen in More Than 200 Wells--The Importance of ScreenSelection Process and Fluid Qualification. Paper SPE 107539 presented at theEuropean Formation Damage Conference, Scheveningen, The Netherlands, 30 May-1June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/107539-MS.
Mondal, S., Sharma, M.M., Chanpura, R.A. et al. 2011. Numerical Simulationsof Sand-Screen Performance in Standalone Applications. SPE Drill &Compl 26 (4): 472-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/134326-PA.
Mondal, S., Sharma, M.M., Hodge, R.M. et al. 2011. A New Method for theDesign and Selection of Premium/Woven Sand Screens. SPE Drill &Compl 27 (3): 407-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/146656-PA.
Rideal, G.R. 2004. A New Sonic Challenge Test for the Pore SizeMeasurement of Sand Screens, Waverton, Chester, United Kingdom: WhitehouseScientific, Ltd.
Sharma, M.M. and Yortsos, Y.C. 1987. Transport of Particulate Suspensions inPorous Media: Model Formulation. AIChE J. 33 (10):1636-1643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690331007.
Tiffin, D.L., King, G.E., Larese, R.E. et al. 1998. New Criteria for Graveland Screen Selection for Sand Control. Paper SPE 39437 presented at the SPEFormation Damage Control Conference, Lafayette, Louisiana, 18-19 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39437-MS.
Underdown, D.R., Dickerson, R.C., and Vaughan, W. 2001. The NominalSand-Control Screen: A Critical Evaluation of Screen Performance. SPE Drill& Compl 16 (4): 252-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/75326-PA.
Valdes, J.R. and Santamarina, J.C. 2006. Particle Clogging in Radial Flow:Microscale Mechanisms. SPE J. 11 (2): 193-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88819-PA.
Williams, C., Richard, B., and Horner, D. 2006. A New Sizing Criterion forConformable and Nonconformable Sand Screens Based on Uniform Pore Structure.Paper SPE 98235 presented at International Symposium and Exhibition onFormation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 15-17 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/98235-MS.