Investigation and Prediction of High-Viscosity Liquid Effect on Two-Phase Slug Length in Horizontal Pipelines
- Eissa M. Al-safran (Kuwait University) | Bahadir Gokcal (ConocoPhillips) | Cem Sarica (University of Tulsa)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- June 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 296 - 305
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 7.4.3 Market analysis /supply and demand forecasting/pricing, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 547 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The recent trend of increasing energy demand led the industry toward the development of heavy oil unconventional resources. However, the production and transportation of such heavy oil is a challenge because of the lack of understanding of two-phase flow behavior under the condition of high-viscosity liquid phase. The objective of this study is to physically understand the effect of liquid viscosity on slug length and develop an empirical two-phase slug-length correlation for high oil viscosity. The developed sluglength correlation can improve the existing two-phase flow models often used in the development and maintenance of heavy-oil fields.
Experimental high-viscosity (0.181-0.589 Pa.s) two-phase air/mineral viscous oil slug-length data is acquired in a horizontal 0.0508-m ID pipe. High-speed recorded flow visualization revealed the effect of liquid-phase viscosity on the scooping and shedding processes at the slug front and back, respectively, and liquid film thickness in the Taylor bubble zone. Data analysis showed a one-third reduction in high viscosity (0.181-0.589 Pa.s) average slug length compared with low viscosity (0.001-0.017 Pa.s) average slug length. Furthermore, analysis of slug-length distributions revealed that as liquid viscosity increases, slug-length distribution deviates from the log-normal distribution to a trancated positively skewed distribution. As a result, the average, the variance, and maximum slug length values vary with liquid viscosity. On the basis of these experimental observations, a physical model is proposed which suggests that the thick liquid film in the Taylor bubble zone and the short slug-mixing zone at the slug front result in a fully developed velocity profile at the slug back, stabilizing the slug at a shorter length. A new dimensional-analysis-based empirical model is proposed to predict dimensionless average slug length for high-viscosity liquid slug flow. A validation and comparison study of the proposed correlation showed the best performance among the existing correlations.
|File Size||841 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Abdul-Majeed, G.H. 2000. Liquid slug holdup in horizontal and slightlyinclined two-phase slug flow. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 27 (1-2):27-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0920-4105(99)00056-X.
Al-Safran, E.M., Sarica, C., Zhang, H.-Q. et al. 2005.Probabilistic/Mechanistic Modeling of Slug-Length Distribution in a HorizontalPipeline. SPE Prod & Oper 20 (2): 160-172.SPE-84230-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84230-PA.
Al-Safran, E.M., Taitel, Y., and Brill, J.P. 2004. Prediction of Slug LengthDistribution Along a Hilly Terrain Pipeline Using Slug Tracking Model. J.Energy Resour. Technol. 126 (1): 54-62.
Barnea, D. and Brauner, N. 1985. Holdup of the liquid slug in two phaseintermittent flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 11 (1): 43-49.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(85)90004-7.
Bethea, R. and Rhinehart, R. 1991. Applied Engineering Statistics.New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
Brandt, I. and Fuchs, P. 1989. Liquid Holdup in Slugs: Some ExperimentalResults from the SINTIF Two-Phase Flow Laboratory. Proc., BHRGMultiphase, Nice, France.
Brauner, N. and Ullmann, A. 2004. Modelling of gas entrainment from Taylorbubbles. Part A: Slug flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 30 (3):239-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2003.11.007.
Brill, J.P., Schmidt, Z., Coberly, W.A. et al. 1981. Analysis of Two-PhaseTests in Large-Diameter Flow Lines in Prudhoe Bay Field. SPE J. 21 (3): 363-378. SPE-8305-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8305-PA.
Colmenares, J., Ortega, P., Padrino, J. et al. 2001. Slug Flow Model for thePrediction of Pressure Drop for High Viscosity Oils in a Horizontal Pipeline.Presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium,Porlamar, Margarita Island, Venezuela, 12-14 March. SPE-71111-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71111-MS.
Dukler, A.E. and Hubbard, M.G. 1975. A Model for Gas-Liquid Slug Flow inHorizontal and Near Horizontal Tubes. Industrial & Engineering ChemistryFundamentals 14 (4): 337-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/i160056a011.
Dukler, A.E., Moalem Maron, D., and Brauner, N. 1985. A physical model forpredicting the minimum stable slug length. Chem. Eng. Sci. 40 (8): 1379-1385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(85)80077-4.
El-Oun, Z. 1990. Gas-liquid Two-phase Flow in Pipelines. Presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 23-26 September.SPE-20645-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20645-MS.
Fabre, J., Grenier, P., and Gadoin, E. 1993. Evolution of Slug Flow in LongPipe. Presented at the Sixth BHRG International Conference on MultiphaseProduction, Cannes, France, 16-18 June.
Gokcal, B., Al-Sarkhi, A., Sarica, C. et al. 2010. Prediction of SlugFrequency for High-Viscosity Oils in Horizontal Pipes. SPE Proj Fac &Const 5 (3): 136-144. SPE-124057-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124057-PA.
Kokal, S. 1987. An Experimental Study of Two-Phase Flow in InclinedPipes. PhD dissertation, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Kora, C., Sarica, C., Zhang, H.-Q. et al. 2011. Effects of High OilViscosity on Slug Liquid Holdup in Horizontal Pipes. Presented at the CanadianUnconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15-17 November.SPE-146954-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/146954-MS.
Kouba, G. 1986. Horizontal slug flow modeling and metering. PhDdissertation, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Marcano, R. 1996. Slug Characteristics for Two-Phase Horizontal Flow.MS thesis, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Nädler, M. and Mewes, D. 1995. Effects of the liquid viscosity on the phasedistributions in horizontal gas-liquid slug flow. Int. J. MultiphaseFlow 21 (2): 253-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(94)00067-T.
Nicholson, M.K., Aziz, K., and Gregory, G.A. 1978. Intermittent two phaseflow in horizontal pipes: Predictive models. The Canadian Journal ofChemical Engineering 56 (6): 653-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450560601.
Norris, L. 1982. Correlation of Prudhoe Bay Liquid Slug Lengths and HoldupsIncluing 1981 Large Diameter Flowline Tests. Internal Report, Exxon ProductionResearch Co., Houston, Texas.
Rothe, P., Crowley, C., and Sam, R. 1986. Investigation of Two-Phase Flow inHorizontal Pipes at large Pipe Size and High Gas Density. PR-172-507, AGA PipeResearch Committee Project.
Scott, S.L. and Kouba, G.E. 1990. Advances in Slug Flow Characterization forHorizontal and Slightly Inclined Pipelines. Presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 23-26 September.SPE-20628-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20628-MS.
Scott, S.L., Shoham, O., and Brill, J.P. 1989. Prediction of Slug Length inHorizontal, Large-Diameter Pipes. SPE Prod Eng 4 (3):335-340. SPE-15103-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15103-PA.
Taitel, Y., Barnea, D., and Duckler, A.E. 1980. Modelling flow patterntransitions for steady upward gas-liquid flow in vertical tubes. AIChEJ. 26 (3): 345-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690260304.
Wallis, G.B. 1969. One Dimensional Two-Phase Flow. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Woods, B.D. and Hanratty, T.J. 1996. Relation of slug stability to sheddingrate. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 22 (5): 809-828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(96)00028-6.