Effective Caprock Determination for SAGD Projects
- Patrick M. Collins (Petroleum Geomechanics Incorporated) | Dale A. Walters (Taurus Reservoir Solutions Limited) | Thomas W. Perkins (Ivanhoe Energy Incorporated) | Joseph D. Kuhach (Ivanhoe Energy Incorporated) | Edwin J. Veith (Ivanhoe Energy Incorporated)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- March 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 112 - 119
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 7.1.10 Field Economic Analysis, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 7.1.9 Project Economic Analysis
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 811 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In the oilsands of western Canada, caprock integrity has become a central issue in projects using steam-injection-recovery processes such as steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD). Caprocks contain steam and fluids within the reservoir; therefore, understanding the integrity of the caprock over the life of the operation is critical in order to ensure a safe and economically viable project. A multidisciplinary study was undertaken to evaluate geological facies as potential caprock for Ivanhoe Energy's Tamarack project. This examination of the historical performance of operating SAGD projects correlated the maximum vertical growth of the steam chamber with geology and the steam-injection operating pressure. The study found that SAGD steam chambers are being constrained by geological facies grading upward to poorer reservoir quality, rather than being constrained by shallower, regionally extensive, massive, low-permeability barriers. Geomechanical reservoir simulations of Ivanhoe Energy's proposed Tamarack SAGD project predict that the steam chamber will be constrained similarly as reservoir quality degrades upward. The simulations show the pressure and stress gradients in the formations above the steam chamber as a function of time and operating conditions, allowing for a more accurate assessment of steam containment and the risk for shear and/or tensile failure. The findings are significant because they confirm that the vertical growth of SAGD steam chambers has been halted, in effect, by facies consisting of interbedded sands and mudstones. These effective caprock facies have higher fracture pressures than the regionally extensive low-permeability barriers because these facies are found at greater depths. The higher fracture pressure justifies a higher maximum operating pressure, with its associated higher reservoir temperatures resulting in much lower bitumen viscosities. As a result, SAGD well productivity and project economics are greatly improved, particularly for shallow SAGD projects.
|File Size||811 KB||Number of Pages||8|
Bell, J.S., Price, P.R., and Mclellan, P.J. 2008. In-situ Stress inthe Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. In Geological Atlas of the WesternCanada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), ed. G.D. Mossop and I. Shetsen, Chap. 29.Available online from Alberta Geological Survey, http://www.ags.gov.ab.ca/publications/wcsb_atlas/atlas.html.
ERCB. 2010. ERCB Staff Review and Analysis: Total E&PCanada Ltd. Surface Steam Release of May 18, 2006, Joslyn Creek SAGD ThermalOperation. Unpublished Report, Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board,Calgary, Alberta (11 February 2010).
Gronseth, J.M. and Kry, P.R. 1983. Instantaneous Shut-in Pressure and itsRelationship to the Minimum In Situ Stress. In Hydraulic Fracturing StressMeasurements, M.D. Zoback and B.C. Haimson, 55-63. Washington, DC: NationalAcademic Press.
Settari, A. and Walters, D.A. 2001. Advances in CoupledGeomechanical and Reservoir Modeling With Applications to Reservoir Compaction.SPE J. 6 (3): 334-342. SPE-51927-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/51927-MS.
Settari, A., Ito, Y., Fukushima, N. et al. 1993. Geotechnicalaspects of recovery processes in oil sands. Canadian GeotechnicalJournal 30 (1): 22-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/t93-003.
Suncor Energy. 2010. Suncor MacKay River 2010 ERCB Performance Presentation,Section 3.1.1-Subsurface Issues Related to Resource Evaluation and Recovery.Interim Progress Report, Commercial Scheme Approval No. 8668, Energy ResourcesConservation Board, Calgary, Alberta (20 October 2010), http://www.ercb.ca/oilsands/insitu-presentations/2010AthabascaSuncorMackayRiverSAGD8668.zip.
Walters, D., Settari, A., and J., W. 2010. CaprockIntegrity and stress paths for SAGD reservoirs. Presented at the 21st CanadianRock Mechanics Symposium (RockEng 2012), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 5-9 May.Paper No. 7103.
Walters, D.A., Wang, J., and Settari, A. 2012. AGeomechanical Methodology for Determining Maximum Operating Pressure in SAGDReservoirs. Presented at the SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada, Calgary, 12-14June. SPE-157855-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/157855-MS.