Effect of Methane Co-Injection in SAGD--Analytical and Simulation Study
- Jyotsna Sharma (University of Calgary) | R. Gordon Moore (University of Calgary) | Sudarshan A. Mehta (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- September 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 687 - 704
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 808 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is a commercially viable recovery method for oil sands of Athabasca used where other methods have been unsuccessful. In one variation of SAGD, a small amount of a noncondensable gas is added to the injected steam to maintain pressure in the chamber while using the energy in place, reducing steam consumption and providing thermal insulation from overburden heat losses. The role of gas during steam-gas co-injection processes, in terms of its effects on chamber development, bitumen flow rates, and heat losses, is not fully understood, and therefore is the main focus of this work.
A new analytical model for gas injection in SAGD is derived, taking into account the three-phase flow of gas, oil, and water in the reservoir. The analytical theory is used to predict the fluid flow rates as well as phase mobility, relative permeability, and saturation profiles in the mobile oil region. The theoretical results are replicated by fine-grid numerical simulations. Methane was used as the noncondensable gas for the purpose of this study because it is the main solution gas in most reservoirs. It is, however, believed that the findings of this study are equally applicable to other noncondensable gases such as nitrogen, air, helium, and others. Fine-grid numerical simulations were performed to gain a visual understanding of gas distribution in a SAGD chamber and its effect on in-situ steam quality, overburden heat losses, phase saturations, and fluid-flow rates. The simulation results support the predictions of the mathematical theory.
The results of the analytical and numerical study reveal that methane co-injection with steam is in general unfavorable in a SAGD operation. The injected methane tends to accumulate at the steam condensation front, which lowers the heat transfer rate of steam to the adjacent oil, resulting in lower oil production rates and slower growth of the chamber.
|File Size||6 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Aherne, A.L. and Birrell, G.E. 2002. Observations Relating to NoncondensableGasses in a Vapour Chamber: Phase B of the Dover Project. Paper SPE 79023presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposiumand International Horizontal Well Technology Conference, Calgary, 4-7 November.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/79023-MS.
Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., and Lightfoot, E.N. 2002. TransportPhenomena, second edition. New York: John Wiley & SonsPublishing.
Butler, R.M. 1985. A new approach to the modeling of steam-assisted gravitydrainage. J Can Pet Technol 24 (3): 42-51.
Butler, R.M. 1987. Rise Of Interfering Steam Chambers. J Can PetTechnol 26 (3): 70-75. Paper No. 87-03-07. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87-03-07.
Butler, R.M. 1997a. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. Calgary,Alberta: GravDrain Inc.
Butler, R.M. 1997b. Steam and Gas Push (SAGP). Paper 97-137 presented at thePetroleum Society's 48th Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, 8-11 June.
Butler, R.M. 1999. The Steam and Gas Push (SAGP). J Can Pet Technol 38 (3): 54-61. JCPT Paper No. 99-03-05. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99-03-05.
Butler, R.M. and Stephens, D.J. 1981. The Gravity Drainage of Steam-HeatedHeavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells. J Can Pet Technol 20 (2): 90-96. JCPT Paper No. 81-02-07. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/81-02-07.
Butler, R.M. and Yee, C.T. 1986. A Theoretical Study of Steam Condensationin the Presence of Noncondensable Gases. AOSTRA Journal of Research 3 (1986): 1.
Butler, R.M., Jiang, Q., and Yee, C.T. 2000a. Steam and Gas Push (SAGP)—2:Mechanism Analysis and Physical Model Testing. J Can Pet Technol 39 (4): 52-61. JCPT Paper No. 00-04-04. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/00-04-04.
Butler, R.M., Jiang, Q., and Yee, C.T. 2000b. Steam and Gas Push (SAGP)—3;Recent Theoretical Developments and Laboratory Results. J Can PetTechnol 39 (8): 51-60. JCPT Paper No. 00-08-04. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/00-08-04.
Butler, R.M., Jiang, Q., and Yee, C.T. 2001. Steam and Gas Push (SAGP)—4;Recent Theoretical Developments and Laboratory Results Using Layered Models.J Can Pet Technol 40 (1): 54-61. JCPT Paper No. 01-01-06.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/01-01-06.
Butler, R.M., McNab, G.S., and Lo, H.Y. 1981. Theoretical studies on thegravity drainage of heavy oil during in situ steam heating. Can. J. Chem.Eng. 59 (4): 455-460.
Carslaw, H.S. and Jaeger, J.C. 1959. Conduction of Heat in Solids,second edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Chung, K.H. and Butler, R.M. 1988. Geometrical Effect of Steam Injection onthe Formation of Emulsion in the Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Process. JCan Pet Technol 27 (1): 36-42. JCPT Paper No. 88-01-02. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88-01-02.
CMG. 2009. STARS User Manual, Version 2009.10. 2009. Calgary, Alberta:Computer Modelling Group (CMG).
Das, S.K. and Butler, R.M. 1996. Diffusion Coefficients of Propane andButane in Peace River Bitumen. The Canadian Journal of ChemicalEngineering 74 (6): 985-992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450740623.
Edmunds, N. 2007. Effect of Solution Gas on 1D Steam Rise in Oil Sands. JCan Pet Technol 46 (1): 56-62. JCPT Paper No. 07-01-07. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/07-01-07.
Edmunds, N.R., Kovalsky, J.A., Gittins, S.D. et al. 1991. Review of thePhase A Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Test to an Underground Test Facility.Paper SPE 21529 presented at the SPE International Thermal OperationsSymposium, Bakersfield, California, USA, 7-8 February.
Farouq-Ali, S.M. 1997. Is There Life After SAGD? J Can Pet Technol 36 (6): 20-23. PETSOC-97-06-DAS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97-06-DAS.
Fu, C.T., Puttagunta, V.R., and Vilcsak, G. 1988. Gas Solubility Of MethaneAnd Ethane In Cold Lake Bitumen At In Situ Conditions. J Can Pet Technol 27 (4): 79-85. PETSOC-88-04-06. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88-04-06.
Gotawala, D.R. and Gates, I.D. 2008. Steam fingering at the edge of a steamchamber in a heavy oil reservoir. The Canadian Journal of ChemicalEngineering 86 (6): 1011-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20117.
Ito, Y. and Suzuki, S. 1996. Numerical simulation of the SAGD process in theHangingstone Oil Sands Reservoir. Proc., 47th ATM of the PetroleumSociety of CIM, Calgary, 10-12 June, Vol. 1, CIM 96-57.
Ito, Y., Ichikawa, M., and Hirata, T. 2001. The Effect of Gas Injection onOil Recovery During SAGD Projects. J Can Pet Technol 40(1): 47-53. JCPT Paper No. 01-01-03. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/01-01-03.
Jamialahmadi, M., Emadi, M., and Müller-Steinhagen, H. 2006. Diffusioncoefficients of methane in liquid hydrocarbons at high pressure andtemperature. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 53 (1-2): 47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.011.
Jensen, M.K. 1988. Condensation with Noncondensables and in MulticomponentMixtures. In Heat Transfer Equipment Design, ed. R.K. Shah, E.C.Subbarao, and R.A. Mashelkar, 497-512. New York: Advanced Study Institute Book,Hemisphere Publishing/Taylor & Frances.
Jiang, Q., Butler, R., and Yee, C.T. 1998. Steam and Gas Push (SAGP)--2:Mechanism Analysis and Physical Model Testing. Paper 98-43 presented at thePetroleum Society's 49th Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, 8-10 June.
Kisman, K.E. and Yeung, K.C. 1995. Numerical Study of the SAGD Process inthe Burnt Lake Oil Sands Lease. Paper SPE 30276 presented at the SPEInternational Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 19-21 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30276-MS.
Maheshwari, N.K., Patel, A.G., Vijayan, P.K. et al. 2004. Evaluation of FreeConvective Condensation Modelling in the Presence of Noncondensable Gas. Paperpresented at the 5th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Yokohama,Japan, 30 May-4 June.
Naar, J. and Wygal, R.J. 1961. Three-Phase Imbibition Relative Permeability.In Transactions of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of the AmericanInstitute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., ed.Volume 222, SPE-90-PA, 254-258. Dallas, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers(SPE).
Naar, J., Wygal, R.J., and Henderson, J.H. 1962. Imbibition RelativePermeability in Unconsolidated Porous Media. SPE J. 2 (1):13-17. SPE-213-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/213-PA.
Othmer, D.F. 1929. The Condensation of Steam. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21 (6): 576-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie50234a018.
Perkins, T.K. and Johnston, O.C. 1963. A Review of Diffusion and Dispersionin Porous Media. SPE J. 3 (1): 70-84. SPE-480-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/480-PA.
Reid, R.C., Prausnitz, J.M., and Sherwood, T.K. 1977. The Properties ofGases and Liquids, third edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sasaki, K., Akibayashi, S., Yazawa, N. et al. 2001. Experimental Modeling ofthe Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process-Enhancing SAGD Performance withPeriodic Stimulation of the Horizontal Producer. SPE J. 6(1): 89-97. SPE-69742-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/69742-PA.
Sharma, J. and Gates, I.D. 2011. Convection at the Edge of aSteam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Steam Chamber. SPE J. 16(3): 503-512. SPE-142432-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/142432-PA.
Sharma, J. and Gates, I.D. 2010a. Multiphase Flow at the Edge of a SteamChamber. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 88(4): 312-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20280.
Sharma, J. and Gates, I.D. 2010b. Steam-Solvent Coupling at the Chamber Edgein an In Situ Bitumen Recovery Process. Paper SPE 128045 presented at the SPEOil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition, Mumbai, India, 20-22 January http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/128045-MS.
Siddique, M., Golay, M.W., and Kazimi, M.S. 1993. Local heat transfercoefficients for forced-convection condensation of steam in a vertical tube inthe presence of a noncondensable gas. Nucl. Technol. 102(3): 386-402. OSTI ID 6552658.
Thimm, H.F. 2000. A General Theory of Gas Production in SAGD Operations.Paper PETSOC-2000-017 presented at the Canadian International PetroleumConference, Calgary, 4-8 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2000-017.
Vierow, K. 1990. Behaviour of Steam-Air Systems Condensing in CocurrentVertical Downflow. MSc thesis, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley,California.
Wilke, C.R. and Chang, P. 1955. Correlation of diffusion coefficients indilute solutions. AIChE J. 1 (2): 264-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690010222.
Yee, C.-T. and Spargo, P. 2001. Wind-Down of a Mature SAGD Chamber at theDover Project (formerly UTF). Paper presented at the 8th SPE/CIM One-DayConference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, 7 November.
Yuan, J.-Y., Law, D.H.S., and Nasr, T.N. 2006. Impact of Gas on SAGD:History Matching of Lab Scale Tests. J Can Pet Technol 45(1): 27-32. JCPT Paper No. 06-01-01. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/06-01-01.