New and Improved Methods for Performing Rate-Transient Analysis of Shale Gas Reservoirs
- Morteza Nobakht (Encana Corporation) | Christopher R. Clarkson (University of Calgary) | Danial Kaviani (ConocoPhilips Canada)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- June 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 335 - 350
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 1.10 Drilling Equipment
- 8 in the last 30 days
- 2,553 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Multifractured horizontal wells are currently the most popular method for exploiting low-permeability tight and shale gas reservoirs. Production data analysis is the most widely used tool for analyzing these reservoirs for the purpose of reserves estimation, hydraulic fracture stimulation optimization, and development planning (Ambrose et al. 2011). However, as pointed out by Clarkson et al. (2011), a fundamental problem with the application of conventional production data analysis to ultralow permeability reservoirs is that current methods were derived with the assumption that flow can be described with Darcy's law. This assumption may not be valid for tight/shale gas reservoirs, as they contain a wide distribution of pore sizes, including in some cases nanopores (Loucks et al. 2009). Therefore, the mean-free path of gas molecules may be comparable to or larger than the average effective rock pore throat radius, causing the gas molecules to slip along pore surfaces. This results in slippage non-Darcy flow, which is not accounted for in conventional production data analysis.
Clarkson et al. (2011) modified the pseudovariables used for analyzing gas reservoirs in production data analysis to account for slippage. They demonstrated that if the effect of slippage is not considered, it leads to noticeable errors in reservoir characterization. Clarkson et al. (2011) also mentioned that even after using the modified pseudovariables, the values for permeability and fracture half-length do not exactly match the input data to simulation. In this paper, a methodology to properly analyze the production data from a fractured well in a tight/shale gas reservoir producing under a constant flowing pressure in the presence of desorption and slippage is presented. This method uses a new pseudotime definition instead of the conventional pseudotime currently being used in production data analysis. The method is validated using a number of numerically simulated cases. It is found that the newly developed analytical method results in a more reliable estimate of fracture half-length or contacted matrix surface area, if permeability is known.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||16|
Agarwal, R.G., Gardner, D.C., Kleinsteiber, S.W., and Fussell, D.D. 1999.Analyzing Well Production Data Using Combined-Type-Curve and Decline-CurveAnalysis Concepts. SPE Res Eval & Eng 2 (5): 478-486.SPE-57916-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/57916-PA.
Ambrose, R.J., Clarkson, C.R., Youngblood, J.E., et al. 2011. Life-CycleDecline Curve Estimation for Tight/Shale Reservoirs. Paper SPE 140519 presentedat the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas,USA, 24-26 January. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140519-MS.
Anderson, D.M. and Mattar, L. 2005. An Improved Pseudo-Time for GasReservoirs with Significant Transient Flow. Paper CIPC 2005-114 presented atthe Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 7-9 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2005-114.
Bumb, A.C. and McKee, C.R. 1988. Gas-Well Testing in the Presence ofDesorption for Coalbed Methane and Devonian Shale. SPE Form Eval 3 (1): 179-185. SPE-15227-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15227-PA.
Bello, R.O. and Wattenbarger, R.A. 2008. Rate Transient Analysis inNaturally Fractured Shale Gas Reservoirs. Paper SPE 114591 presented at theCIPC/SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, 16-19 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/114591-MS.
Carslaw, H.S. and Jaeger, J.C. 1959. Conduction of Heat in Solids,second edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Civan, F. 2010. Effective Correlation of Apparent Gas Permeability in TightPorous Media. Transport Porous Media 82 (2): 375-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9432-z.
Clarkson, C.R., Bustin, R.M., and Seidle, J.P. 2007. Production-DataAnalysis of Single-Phase (Gas) Coalbed-Methane Wells. SPE Res Eval &Eng 10 (3): 312-331. SPE-100313-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/100313-PA.
Clarkson, C.R., Nobakht, M., Kaviani, D., and Ertekin, T. 2011. ProductionAnalysis of Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoirs Using the Dynamic-SlippageConcept. Paper SPE 144317 presented at the North American Unconventional GasConference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 14-16 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/144317-MS.
El-Banbi, A.H. and Wattenbarger, R.A. 1998. Analysis of Linear Flow in GasFlow Production. Paper SPE 39972 presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium,Calgary, 15-18 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39972-MS.
Ertekin, T., King, G.A., and Schwerer, F.C. 1986. Dynamic Gas Slippage: AUnique Dual-Mechanism Approach to the Flow of Gas in Tight Formations. SPEForm Eval 1 (1): 43-52. SPE-12045-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12045-PA.
Fraim, M.L. and Wattenbarger, R.A. 1987. Gas Reservoir Decline CurveAnalysis Using Type Curves with Real Gas Pseudopressure and Normalized Time.SPE Form Eval 2 (4): 671-682. SPE-14238-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14238-PA.
Heid, J.G., McMahon, J.J., Nielsen, R.F., and Yuster, S.T. 1950. Study ofthe Permeability of Rocks to Homogeneous Fluids. API Drilling &Production Practice (1950): 230-246.
Ibrahim, M. and Wattenbarger, R.A. 2005. Rate Dependence of Transient LinearFlow in Tight Gas Wells. Paper CIPC 2005-057 presented at the CanadianInternational Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 7-9 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2005-057.
Ibrahim, M. and Wattenbarger, R.A. 2006. Analysis of Rate Dependence inTransient Linear Flow in Tight Gas Wells. Paper SPE 100836 presented at the AbuDhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 5-8November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/100836-MS.
Javadpour, F. 2009. Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow inMudrocks (Shales and Siltstone). J Can Pet Technol 48 (8):16-21. JCPT Paper No. 09-08-16-DA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/09-08-16-DA.
Jones, F.O. and Owens, W.W. 1980. A Laboratory Study of Low-Permeability GasSands. J Pet Technol 32 (9): 1631-1640. SPE-7551-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/7551-PA.
King, G.R. 1993. Material-Balance Techniques for Coal-Seam and DevonianShale Gas Reservoirs with Limited Water Influx. SPE Res Eng 8 (1): 67-72. SPE-20730-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20730-PA.
Klinkenberg, L.J. 1941. The permeability of porous media to liquids andgases. API Drilling & Production Practice (1941): 200- 213.
Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., Ruppel, S.C., and Jarvie, D.M. 2009. Morphology,Genesis, and Distribution of Nanometer-Scale Pores in Siliceous Mudstones ofthe Mississippian Barnett Shale. J. Sediment. Res. 79 (12):848-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2009.092.
Moghadam, S., Jeje, O., and Mattar, L. 2011. Advanced Gas Material Balancein Simplified Format. J Can Pet Technol 50 (1): 90-98.SPE-139428-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/139428-PA.
Nobakht, M., Mattar, L., Moghadam, S., and Anderson, D.M. 2010. SimplifiedYet Rigorous Forecasting of Tight/Shale Gas Production in Linear Flow. PaperSPE 133615 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anaheim, California,USA, 27-29 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/133615-MS.
Nobakht, M. and Clarkson, C.R. 2011a. A New Analytical Method for AnalyzingProduction Data from Shale Gas Reservoirs Exhibiting Linear Flow: ConstantPressure Production. Paper SPE 143989 presented at the North AmericanUnconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 14-16June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143989-MS.
Nobakht, M. and Clarkson, C.R. 2011b. A New Analytical Method for AnalyzingProduction Data from Shale Gas Reservoirs Exhibiting Linear Flow: Constant RateProduction. Paper SPE 143990 presented at the North American Unconventional GasConference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 14-16 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143990-MS.
Nobakht, M. and Clarkson, C.R. 2011c. Estimation of Contacted and OriginalGas-in-Place for Low Permeability Reservoirs Exhibiting Linear Flow. Paper SPE149398 presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary,01/01/2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/149398-MS.
Sampth , K. and Keighin, C.W. 1982. Factors Affecting Gas Slippage in TightSandstone of Cretaceous Age in Unita Basin. J Pet Technol 34 (11): 2715-2720. SPE-9872-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/9872-PA.
Wattenbarger, R.A., El-Banbi, A.H., Villegas, M.E., and Maggard, J.B. 1998.Production Analysis of Linear Flow Into Fractured Tight Gas Wells. Paper SPE39931 presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-Permeability ReservoirsSymposium, Denver, 5-8 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39931-MS.