Stability Analysis of Pipe With Connectors in Horizontal Wells
- Guohua Gao (Shell) | Qinfeng Di (Shanghai University) | Stefan Miska (University of Tulsa) | Wenchang Wang (Shanghai University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- September 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 931 - 941
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3.1.1 Beam and related pumping techniques, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 1.10 Drilling Equipment
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 368 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Except for coiled tubing, most tubular goods used for downhole operations (such as drillpipe and sucker rod) have connectors. Because a connector and the pipe body have different outer radii, the deformation and buckling behavior of a pipe with connectors constrained in a wellbore is much more complicated. However, most buckling models were established by neglecting the existence and effects of connectors.
In this paper, buckling equations of a pipe with connectors in horizontal wells were derived with application of elastic-beam theory. The axis of an unbuckled pipe is a 2D curve in the vertical plane and has three configurations--no contact, point contact, and wrap contact. We derived the two critical distances between connectors, Lc1 and Lc2, beyond which a pipe changes its configuration from one to another. The authors proposed an algorithm to determine the critical force (Fcrs) of buckling by numerically solving the buckling equations using the fourth-order Ronge-Kuta method.
Both the distance between two adjacent connectors (Lc) and the radius difference between a connector and the pipe body (?rc) have significant impact on the critical force, in addition to net clearance between a pipe and wellbore (r0), bending stiffness (EI), and weight per unit length (w) of pipe. When Lc is small, radial deflection is negligible. Fcrs increases as ?rc increases. However, when Lc is close to Lc1, effects of radial displacement become significant, and Fcrs decreases dramatically as ?rc increases. Fcrs decreases as Lc increases when Lc < Lc1, and it reaches its minimum at Lc = Lc1. When Lc > Lc1, Fcrs fluctuates as Lc increases. Some curves of Lc1, Lc2, and Fcrs, all in dimensionless forms, were calculated and presented in this paper for practical applications.
Our numerical results show that the critical force may reduce by 20 to 60% for commonly used drillpipes and sucker rods with centralizers, which indicates that a pipe string designed without considering the effects of connectors may be risky. The results presented in this paper may provide some practical guidance for optimal design of centralizers for sucker-rod strings, or may avoid some risks because of improper design of drillpipe strings.
|File Size||642 KB||Number of Pages||11|
Butcher, J.C. 2003. Numerical Methods for Ordinary DifferentialEquations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, Y.-C., Lin, Y.-H., and Cheatham, J.B. 1990. Tubular and CasingBuckling in Horizontal Wells. J Pet Technol 42 (2): 140-141, 191.SPE-19176-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/19176-PA.
Cunha, J.C. 2004. Buckling of Tubulars Inside Wellbores: A Review on RecentTheoretical and Experimental Works. SPE Drill & Compl 19 (1):13-19. SPE-87895-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87895-PA.
Dawson, R. and Paslay, P.R. 1984. Drill Pipe Buckling in Inclined Holes.J Pet Technol 36 (10): 1734-1738. SPE-11167-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/11167-PA.
Duman, O.B., Miska, S., and Kuru, E. 2003. Effect of Tool Joints on ContactForce and Axial Force Transfer in Horizontal Wellbores. SPE Drill &Compl 18 (3): 267-274. SPE-85775-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/85775-PA.
Deli, G., Liu, F., and Xu, B. 1998. An Analysis of Helical Buckling of LongTubulars in Horizontal Wells. Paper SPE 50931 presented at the SPEInternational Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China,2-6 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/50931-MS.
Gao, G. et al. 1994. Sinusoidal Buckling of Pipes in Horizontal Boreholes(in Chinese). Journal of Xi'an Petroleum Institute 9 (2):37-40.
Gao, G. 1996. Buckling and Bifurcation of Oil Well Tubular (inChinese). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press.
Gao, G. and Miska, S. 2009a. Effects of Boundary Conditions and Friction onStatic Buckling of Pipe in a Horizontal Well. SPE J. 14 (4):782-796. SPE-111511-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/111511-PA.
Gao, G. and Miska, S. 2009b. Effects of Friction on Post-Buckling Behaviorand Axial Load Transfer in a Horizontal Well. Paper SPE 120084 presented at theSPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 4-8April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/120084-MS.
He, X., Halsey, G.W., and Kyllingstad, A. 1995. Interactions Between Torqueand Helical Buckling in Drilling. Paper SPE 30521 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 22-25 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30521-MS.
He, X. and Kyllingstad, A. 1995. Helical Buckling and Lock-Up Conditions forCoiled Tubing in Curved Wells. SPE Drill & Compl 10 (1):10-15. SPE-25370-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25370-PA.
Kuru, E., Martinez, A., Miska, S., and Qui, W. 1999. The Buckling Behaviorof Pipes and Its Influence on the Axial Force Transfer in Directional Wells.Paper SPE 52840 presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 9-11March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/52840-MS.
Kyllingstad, A. 1995. Buckling of tubular strings in curved wells. J.Pet. Sci. Eng. 12 (3): 209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0920-4105(94)00046-7.
Lubinski, A. 1950. A study of the buckling of rotary drilling strings.API Drilling and Production Practice (1950): 178-214.
Lubinski, A., Althouse, W.S., and Logan, J.L. 1962. Helical Buckling ofTubing Sealed in Packers. J Pet Technol 14 (6): 655-670.SPE-178-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/178-PA.
Menand, S., Isambourg, P., Sellami, H., Simon, C., and Bouguecha, A. 2009.Axial Force Transfer of Buckled Drill Pipe in Deviated Wells. Paper SPE 119861presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 17-19March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119861-MS.
Miska, S., Qiu, W., Volk, L., and Cunha, J.C. 1996. An Improved Analysis ofAxial Force Along Coiled Tubing in Inclined/Horizontal Wellbores. Paper SPE37056 presented at the International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology,Calgary, 18-20 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37056-MS.
Mitchell, R.F. 1988. New Concepts for Helical Buckling. SPE Drill Eng3 (3): 303-310. SPE-15470-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15470-PA.
Mitchell, R.F. 1997. Effects of Well Deviation on Helical Buckling. SPEDrill & Compl 12 (1): 63-70. SPE-29462-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/29462-PA.
Mitchell, R.F. 1999. Helical Buckling of Pipe With Connectors. Paper SPE52847 presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 9-11 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/52847-MS.
Mitchell, R.F. 2002. Exact Analytical Solutions for Pipe Buckling inVertical and Horizontal Wells. SPE J. 7 (4): 373-390.SPE-72079-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/72079-PA.
Mitchell, R.F. 2003a. Lateral Buckling of Pipe With Connectors in HorizontalWells. SPE J. 8 (2): 124-137. SPE-84950-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84950-PA.
Mitchell, R.F. 2003b. Lateral Buckling of Pipe With Connectors in CurvedWellbores. SPE Drill & Compl 18 (1): 22-32. SPE-67727-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/81819-PA.
Mitchell, R.F. and Miska, S. 2006. Helical Buckling of Pipe With Connectorsand Torque. SPE Drill & Compl 21 (2): 108-115. SPE-87205-PA.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87205-PA.
Mitchell, R.F. 2008. Tubing Buckling--The State of the Art. SPE Drill& Compl 23 (4): 361-370. SPE-104267-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/104267-PA.
Paslay, P.R. and Bogy, D.B. 1964. The Stability of a Circular Rod LaterallyConstrained to Be in Contact With an Inclined Circular Cylinder. J. Appl.Mech. 31 (4): 605-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3629721.
Paslay, P.R. and Cernocky, E.P. 1991. Bending Stress Magnification inConstant Curvature Doglegs With Impact on Drillstring and Casing. Paper SPE22547 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas,6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22547-MS.
Qiu, W., Miska, S., and Volk, L. 1998. Drill Pipe/Coiled Tubing BucklingAnalysis in a Hole of Constant Curvature. Paper SPE 39795 presented at the SPEPermian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, USA, 23-26March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39795-MS.
Qiu, W. 1999. Force Transmission of Coiled Tubing in Horizontal Wells. PaperSPE 54584 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anchorage, 26-27 May.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/54584-MS.
Suryanarayana, P.V.R. and McCann, R.C. 1994. Experimental Study of Bucklingand Post-Buckling of Laterally Constrained Rods: Part 1--Frictional Effects.Presentation given at the ASME Energy-Source Technology Conference andExhibition, New Orleans, 23-27 January.
Suryanarayana, P.V.R. and McCann, R.C. 1995. An Experimental Study ofBuckling and Post-Buckling of Laterally Constrained Rods. J. Energy Resour.Technol. 117 (2): 115-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2835327.