In-Situ Upgrading of Heavy Oil/Bitumen During Steam Injection by Use of Metal Nanoparticles: A Study on In-Situ Catalysis and Catalyst Transportation
- Yousef Hamedi Shokrlu (University of Alberta) | Tayfun Babadagli (University of Alberta)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- July 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 333 - 344
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 4.3.3 Aspaltenes, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 843 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Studies on the application of transition-metal catalysts for heavy oil or bitumen in-situ upgrading were conducted in the absence of a porous medium, mainly measuring the characteristics of heavy oil in reaction with metal ions at static conditions with the help of a magnetic stirrer. Metal species in ionic form are not soluble in oil phase. Therefore, metal particles, as inhomogeneous catalysts, are considered in this paper. Furthermore, dynamic tests in porous media are needed to clarify the injection possibility of the metalparticles and their effect on in-situ upgrading of heavy oil. Injection of metal particles may deteriorate the recovery process by damaging porous media because of attractive forces such as van der Waals and electrostatic forces between particles and porous rock. A better understanding of these forces and their importance in the retention of particles is required. In this paper, the catalysis effect of pure nanometer-sized nickel during steam-injection application was compared with that of an industrial catalyst such as micron-sized Raney nickel. The changes in the viscosity, refractive index, and asphaltene content were measured after each test to analyze the catalysis effects. Nickel nanoparticles showed a better catalysis compared with Raney nickel. The approximate optimum concentration of the catalysts was determined. Then, the catalysis effect of nickel nanoparticles was studied in the presence of sandpack as a porous medium. The results showed accelerated catalysis in presence of the sands. Also, nickel nanoparticles improved the oil recovery factor. The next phase of this paper studies the injectivity and transport of nickel particles. The injected suspension was stabilized by use of xanthan gum polymer and ultrasonication. The effect of solution pH, which controls the magnitude of the repulsive electrostatic forces, was clarified. Stabilization of the metal particles' suspension was studied at different pH values through zeta-potential measurements. Also, the zeta potential of the recovered suspensions was studied to confirm the stability of the suspension during travel through the porous medium. Depending on the size, particles carry different charges and have different settling velocities. Therefore, the stabilization pH and dispersant concentration were different from one sample to another. The results of the injectivity tests confirmed the lower retention and better injectivity of nanoparticles in comparison with micron-sized particles.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Barrio, V.L., Arias, P.L., Cambra, J.F., et al. 2003. AromaticsHydrogenation on Silica-Alumina Supported Palladium-Nickel Catalysts. Appl.Catal. A-Gen. 242 (1): 17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00489-1.
Callaghan, C.A. 2006. Kinetics and Catalysis of the Water-Gas-ShiftReaction: A Microkinetic and Graph Theoretic Approach. PhD dissertation,Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts (2006).
Clark, P. D. and Hyne, J. B. 1984. Steam-Oil Chemical Reactions: Mechanismsfor the Aquathermolysis of Heavy Oils. AOSTRA J. Res. 1(1): 15-20.
Clark, P. D., Clarke, R. A., Hyne, J.B., et al. 1990a. Studies on the Effectof Metal Species on Oil Sands Undergoing Steam Treatments. AOSTRA J.Res. 6 (1): 53-64.
Clark, P. D., Clarke, R. A., Hyne, J.B., et al. 1990b. Studies on theChemical Reactions of Heavy Oils Under Steam Stimulation Conditions. AOSTRAJ. Res. 6 (1): 29-39.
Davidson, R. J. 1995. Electromagnetic Stimulation of Lloydminster Heavy OilReservoirs: Field Test Results. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 34 (4):15-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/95-04-01.
Fan, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, L., et al. 2002. The Study on Composition Changesof Heavy Oils During Steam Stimulation Processes. Fuel 81(13): 1733-1738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00100-X.
Fan, H., Zhang, Y. and Lin, Y. 2004. The Catalytic Effects of Minerals onAquathermolysis of Heavy Oils. Fuel 83 (14-15): 2035-2039.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.04.010.
Guangshou, S., Tiyao, Z., Linsong, C., et al. 2009. Aquathermolysis ofconventional heavy oil with superheated steam. Pet. Sci. 6(3): 289-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12182-009-0046-4.
Hamedi, S.Y. and Babadagli, T. 2010. Effects of Nano Sized Metals onViscosity Reduction of Heavy Oil/Bitumen during Thermal Applications. Paper SPE137540 presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and InternationalPetroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 19-21 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/137540-MS.
Hascakir, B. 2008. Investigation of Productivity of Heavy Oil Carbonates andOil Shales Using Electrical Heating Methods. PhD dissertation, Middle EastTechnical University, Ankara, Turkey (2008).
Hascakir, B., Babadagli, T. and Akin, S. 2008. Experimental and NumericalModeling of Heavy-Oil Recovery by Electrical Heating. Paper SPE 117669presented at the International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium,Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 20-23 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/117669-MS.
Hyne, J.B. and Greidanus, J.W. 1982. Aquathermolysis of Heavy Oils. Proc.,International Conference on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands, Caracas, Venezuela, Vol.II, 25-30.
Hyne, J.B. 1986. Aquathermolysis: A Synopsis of Work on the ChemicalReaction Between Water and Heavy Oil Sands During Simulated SteamStimulation. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Alberta Oil Sands Technology andResearch Authority.
Li, W., Zhu, J. and Qi, J. 2007. Application of Nano-Nickel Catalyst in theViscosity Reduction of Liaohe Extra-Heavy Oil by Aqua-Thermolysis. J. FuelChem. Tech. 35 (2): 176-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(07)60016-4.
Nguyen, Q.P., Currie, P.K. and Bouzanga, P.S.R. 2009. The Effect of Gas andFoam on the Injectivity of Particles in Sandstone. Paper SPE 121637 presentedat the European Formation Damage Conference, Scheveningen, The Netherlands,27-29 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/121637-MS.
Peña, J.A., Herguido, J., Guimon, C., et al. 1996. Hydrogenation ofAcetylene over Ni/NiAl2O4 Catalyst: Characterization,Coking, and Reaction Studies. J. Catal. 159 (2): 313-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1996.0093.
Pizarro, J. O. S. and Trevisan, A.V. 1990. Electrical Heating of OilReservoirs: Numerical Simulation and Field Test Results. J. Pet. Tech. 42 (10): 1320-1326. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/19685-PA.
Rahimi, P.M. and Gentzis, T.2006. The Chemistry of Bitumen and Heavy OilProcessing. In Practical Advances in Petroleum Processing, eds. C.S. Hsuand P.R. Robinson, Chap. 19, 149-179. New York City, New York: Springer NewYork.
Rodriguez, E., Roberts, M.R., Yu, H., et al. 2009. Enhanced Migration ofSurface-Treated Nanoparticles in Sedimentary Rocks. Paper SPE 124418 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana,4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124418-MS.
Ross, J. R. H. 1985. Metal Catalysed Methanation and Steam Reforming. InCatalysis, eds. G.C. Bond and G. Webb, Chap. 1, 1-45. London, UK: TheRoyal Society of Chemistry.
Sahni, A., Kumar, M. and Knap, R.B. 2000. Electromagnetic Heating Methodsfor Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper SPE 62550 presented at the SPE/AAPG WesternRegional Meeting, Long Beach, California, 19-22 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/62550-MS.
Shaw, J.E., 1989. Molecular Weight Reduction of Petroleum Asphaltenes byReaction with Methyl Iodide-Sodium Iodide. Fuel 68 (9):1218-1220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(89)90199-3.
Sigma-Aldrich. 2012. Sigma-Aldrich, www.sigmaaldrich.com (accessed November2012).
Skauge, T., Hetland, S., Spildo K., et al. A. 2010. Nano-Sized Particles forEOR. Paper SPE 129933 presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium,Tulsa, Oklahoma, 24-28 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/129933-MS.
Speight, J.G. 1992. A Chemical and Physical Explanation of Incompatibilityduring Refining Operations. Proc. Stability and Handling of Liquid Fuels: 4thInternational Conference, Orlando, Florida, 169.
Studart, A.R., Amstad, E. and Gauckler, L.J. 2007. Colloidal Stabilizationof Nanoparticles in Concentrated Suspensions. Langmuir 23(3): 1081-1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la062042s.
Tang, G., Mayes, M.A., Parker, J.C., et al. 2010. CXTFIT/Excel-A ModularAdaptive Code for Parameter Estimation, Sensitivity Analysis and UncertaintyAnalysis for Laboratory or Field Tracer Experiments. Comput. Geosci. 36 (9): 1200-1209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.01.013.