Integrating Mini-DST-Derived Permeability With Other Sources: A Case Study
- Iwan Harmawan (Hess Corporation) | C. Shah Kabir (Hess Corporation) | Shabir M. Habib (Hess Corporation) | John Kennedy (Hess Corporation) | Jo Henson (Hess Corporation) | Haq N. Minhas (Petronas Carigali)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- June 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 361 - 369
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.6.3 Pressure Transient Testing, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing
- mini-DST with formation testers, integration of permeability from different sources
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,010 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Permeability is the cornerstone of any reservoir-flow modeling that leads to field development and production management. Typical sources of permeability include cores, logs, wireline formation tests [or minidrillstem tests (mini-DSTs)], and conventional DSTs. However, integrating various sources of permeability at different scales is problematic. Anchored in mini-DST-derived permeability, this study endeavors to integrate various sources of permeability, leading to reservoir description in a turbidite sandstone reservoir in the Sabah basin, Malaysia.
Pressure-transient-test data recorded during a mini-DST operation differed significantly from data gathered during a conventional DST. Even though test quality was excellent, interpretation challenges were numerous in this well. Consequently, multidisciplinary information was brought to bear for integration of data derived from mini-DSTs. Other sources of information included sidewall cores, spot pressure measurements, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and microelectrical imaging logs. This case study demonstrates that, in this particular setting, the use of mini-DSTs was cost-effective and yielded the subsurface information required to plan field-development options.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Bertolini, C., Tripaldi, G., Manassero, E., Beretta, E., Viberti, D., andVerga, F. 2009. A Cost Effective and User Friendly Approach for mini-DSTsDesign. Paper SPE 122886 presented at the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference andExhibition, Amsterdam, 8-11 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/122886-MS.
Coelho, A.C.D., Camargo, C., Kato, E.T., and Legrand, V.M.Q.F. 2005.Utilizing Mini-DST for Formation Evaluation. Paper SPE 94963 presented at theSPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Rio deJaneiro, 1-4 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94963-MS.
Contreiras, K.D., Van-Dùnem, F., Weinheber, P., Gisolf, A., and Rueda,M. 2008. Improved Techniques for Acquiring Pressure and Fluid Data in aChallenging Offshore Carbonate Environment. Paper SPE 115504 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 21-24 September.
Daungkaew, S., Harfoushian, J.H., Cheong, B.C., Akinsanmi, O.B.,Toulekima, S.B., and Yeo, J.Y.S. 2007. Mini-DST Applications for ShellDeepwater Malaysia. Paper SPE 109279 presented at the Asia Pacific Oil and GasConference and Exhibition, Jakarta, 30 October-1 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/109279-MS.
Elshahawi, H., Hite, R.H., and Hows, M.P. 2008. The State of Optimum ValueTesting—The Vision and the Reality. Paper IPTC 12075 presented at theInternational Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 3-5 December. http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/12075-MS.
Frimann-Dahl, C., Irvine-Fortescue, J., Rokke, E., Vik, S., and Wahl, O.1998. Formation Testers vs. DST--The Cost Effective Use of Transient Analysisto Get Reservoir Parameters. Paper SPE 48962 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27-30 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/48962-MS.
Gok, I.M., Onur, M., Hegeman, P.S., and Kuchuk, F.J. 2006. Effect of anInvaded Zone on Pressure-Transient Data From Multiprobe and Packer-ProbeWireline Formation Testers. SPE Res Eval & Eng 9 (1):39-49. SPE-84093-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84093-PA.
Kamal, M.M. 2009. Transient Well Testing, No. 23. Richardson, Texas:Monograph Series, SPE.
Kuchuk, F.J., Ramakrishnam, T.S., and Dave, Y. 1994. Interpretation ofWireline Formation Tester Packer and Probe Pressures. Paper SPE 28404 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 25-28September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28404-MS.
Kumar, N.K., Joshi, S., Banerjee, R., and Sundaram, K.M. 2008. A New Methodfor Gas Well Deliverability Potential Estimation Using MiniDST and Single WellModeling: Theory and Examples. Paper SPE 113650 presented at the SPE Indian Oiland Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Mumbai, India, 4-6 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/113650-MS.
Ramaswami, S.R., Elshahawi, H., and El-battawy, A. 2010. Integration ofWireline Formation Testing and Well Testing Evaluation--An Example from theCaspian. Paper SPE 139837 presented at the SPE Caspian Carbonates TechnologyConference, Atyrau, Kazakhstan, 8-10 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/139837-MS.
Samuelsen, E.H., Gisolf, A., Achourov, V.V., Seri, G., and Eriksen, K.O.2009. Extending the Limit: Interval Pressure Transient Testing inLow-Permeability Reservoirs in the North Sea. Paper SPE 124842 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124842-MS.