Experimental Investigation of Near-Miscible Water-Alternating-Gas Injection Performance in Water-Wet and Mixed-Wet Systems
- S. Mobeen Fatemi (Heriot-Watt University) | Mehran Sohrabi (Heriot-Watt University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- January 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 114 - 123
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5.4.9 Miscible Methods
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 924 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Laboratory data on water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection for non-water-wet systems are very limited, especially for near-miscible (very low IFT) gas/oil systems, which represent injection scenarios involving high-pressure hydrocarbon gas or CO2 injection. Simulation of these processes requires three-phase relative permeability (kr) data. Most of the existing three-phase relative permeability correlations have been developed for water-wet conditions. However, a majority of oil reservoirs are believed to be mixed-wet and, hence, prediction of the performance of WAG injection in these reservoirs is associated with significant uncertainties. Reliable simulation of WAG injection, therefore, requires improved relative permeability and hysteresis models validated by reliable measured data.
In this paper, we report the results of a comprehensive series of coreflood experiments carried out in a core under natural water-wet conditions. These included water injection, gas injection, and also WAG injection. Then, to investigate the impact of wettability on the performance of these injection strategies, the wettability of the same core was changed to mixed-wet (by aging the core in an appropriate crude oil) and a similar set of experiments were performed in the mixed-wet core. WAG experiments under both wettability conditions started with water injection (I) followed by gas injection (D), and this cyclic injection of water and gas was repeated (IDIDID).
The results show that in both the water-wet and mixed-wet cores, WAG injection performs better than water injection or gas injection alone. Changing the rock wettability from water-wet to mixed-wet significantly improves the performance of water injection. Under both wettability conditions (water-wet and mixed-wet), the breakthrough (BT) of the gas during gas injection happens sooner than the BT of water in water injection. Ultimate oil recovery by gas injection is considerably higher than that obtained by water injection in the water-wet system, while in the mixed-wet system, gas injection recovers considerably less oil.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Agbalaka, C.C., Dandekar, A.Y., Patil, S.L. et al. 2008. The Effect ofWettability on Oil Recovery: A Review. Paper SPE 114496 presented at the SPEAsia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, 20-22October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/114496-MS.
Akin, S. and Kovscek, A.R. 2003. Computed tomography in petroleumengineering research. In Applications of Computerized X-ray Tomography inGeology and Related Domains, ed. P. Jacobs, F. Mees, R. Swennen, and M. VanGeet, No. 215, 23-38. London: Geological Society.
Awan, A.R., Teigland, R., and Kleppe, J. 2008. A Survey of North SeaEnhanced-Oil-Recovery Projects Initiated During the Years 1975 to 2005. SPERes Eval & Eng 11 (3): 497-512. SPE-99546-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99546-PA.
Blunt, M.J. 2000. An Empirical Model for Three-Phase Relative Permeability.SPE J. 5 (4): 435-445. SPE-67950-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/67950-PA.
Buckley, J.S., Liu, Y., and Monsterleet, S. 1998. Mechanisms of WettingAlteration by Crude Oils. SPE J. 3 (1): 54-61.SPE-37230-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37230-PA.
Caudle, B.H. and Dyes, A.B. 1958. Improving Miscible Displacement byGas-Water Injection. In Transactions of the American Institute of Mining,Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, ed. Vol. 213, 281-284. Dallas,Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Christensen, J.R., Stenby, E.H., and Skauge, A. 2001. Review of WAG FieldExperience. SPE Res Eval & Eng 4 (2): 97-106. SPE-71203-PA.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71203-PA.
DiCarlo, D.A., Sahni, A., and Blunt, M.J. 2000a. Three-Phase Relativepermeability of Water-Wet, Oil-Wet and Mixed-Wet Sandpacks. SPE J. 5 (1): 82-91. SPE-60767-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/60767-PA.
DiCarlo, D.A., Sahni, A., and Blunt, M.J. 2000b. The Effect of Wettabilityon Three-Phase Relative Permeability. Transport Porous Media 39 (3): 347-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1006653323374.
Element, D.J., Masters, J.H.K., Sargent, N.C. et al. 2003. Assessment ofThree-Phase Relative Permeability Models Using Laboratory Hysteresis Data.Paper SPE 84903 presented at the SPE International Improved Oil RecoveryConference in Asia Pacific, Kuala Lumpur, 20-21 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84903-MS.
Gozalpour, F., Danesh, A., Todd, A.C. et al. 2005. Viscosity, density,interfacial tension and compositional data for near critical mixtures ofmethane + butane and methane + decane systems at 310.95 K. Fluid PhaseEquilib. 233 (2): 144-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2005.03.032.
Jadhunandan, P.P. and Morrow, N.R. 1995. Effect of Wettability on WaterfloodRecovery for Crude-Oil/Brine/Rock Systems. SPE Form Eval 10(1): 40-46. SPE-22597-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22597-PA.
Kulkarni, M.M. and Rao, D.N. 2005. Experimental investigation of miscibleand immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) process performance. J. Pet. Sci.Eng. 48 (1-2): 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.05.001.
Shahverdi, H., Jamiolahmady, M., Sohrabi, M. et al. 2011. Evaluation ofThree-Phase Relative Permeability Models for WAG Injection Using Water-Wet andMixed-Wet Core Flood Experiments. Paper SPE 143030 presented at the SPEEUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 23-26 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143030-MS.
Shahverdi, H., Sohrabi, M., and Jamiolahmady, M. 2010. A New Algorithm forEstimating Three-Phase Relative Permeability from Unsteady-state CoreExperiments. Paper SCA2010-42 presented at the 24th International Symposium ofCore Analysts, Halifax, Canada, 4-7 October.
Skauge, A. and Aarra, M. 1993. Effect of Wettability on the Oil Recovery byWAG. Paper presented at the 7th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery,Moscow, 26-28 October.
Sohrabi, M. 2001. Water Alternating Gas Injection (WAG) Studies. PhDthesis, Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh,Scotland.
Sohrabi, M., Danesh, A., and Jamiolahmady, M. 2008b. Visualisation ofResidual Oil Recovery by Near-miscible Gas and SWAG Injection UsingHigh-pressure Micromodels. Transport Porous Media 74 (2):239-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-007-9193-5.
Sohrabi, M., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D.H. et al. 2008a. Microscopic Mechanismsof Oil Recovery by Near-Miscible Gas Injection. Transport Porous Media 72 (3): 351-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-007-9154-z.
Sohrabi, M., Fatemi, M., Shahverdi, H. et al. 2011. Reliable Prediction ofWater Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Performance. Paper presented at the 8thAnnual European Production and Development Conference and Exhibition (DEVEX2011) Aberdeen, 11-12 May.
Sohrabi, M., Shahverdi, H., Jamiolahmady, M. et al. 2010. Experimental andTheoretical Three-phase Relative Permeability for WAG Injection in Mixed-Wetand Low IFT Systems. Paper presented at the 24th International Symposium ofCore Analysts, Halifax, Canada, 4-7 October.
Sohrabi, M., Tehrani, D.H., Danesh, A. et al. 2004. Visualization of OilRecovery by Water-Alternating-Gas Injection Using High-Pressure Micromodels.SPE J. 9 (3): 290-301. SPE-89000-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89000-PA.
Suicmez, V.S., Piri, M., and Blunt, M.J. 2007. Pore-scale Simulation ofWater Alternate Gas Injection. Transport Porous Media 66(3): 259-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-006-0017-9.
Tiab, D. and Donaldson, E.C. 2004. Petrophysics: Theory and Practices ofMeasuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties, second edition.Oxford, UK: Gulf Professional Publishing.