Characterization of Filter Cake Generated by Water-Based Drilling Fluids Using CT Scan
- Salah Elkatatny (Texas A&M University) | Mohamed A. Mahmoud (Texas A&M University) | Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- June 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 282 - 293
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 2 Well Completion
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 1,345 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Filter-cake characterization is very important in drilling and completion operations. The homogeneity of the filter cake affects the properties of the filtration process such as the volume of filtrate, the thickness of the filter cake, and the best method to remove it. Various models were used to determine the thickness and permeability of the filter cake. Most of these models assumed that the filter cake was homogeneous. The present study shows that the filter cake is not homogeneous, and consists of two layers of different properties.
The objective of this study is to measure the filter-cake thickness and permeability of water-based drilling fluids by a new approach and compare the results with previous models. A high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) filter press was used to perform the filtration process under static conditions (225°F and 300 psi). A computed-tomography (CT) scan was used to measure the thickness and porosity of the filter cake. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to provide the morphology of the filter cake.
The results obtained from the CT scan showed that the filter cake was heterogeneous and contained two layers with different properties under static and dynamic conditions. Under static conditions, the layer close to the rock surface had a 0.06-in. thickness, 10- to 20-vol% porosity, and 0.087-µd permeability, while under dynamic conditions, this layer had a 0.04-in. thickness, 15-vol% porosity, and 0.068-µd permeability. The layer close to the drilling fluid had a 0.1-in. and 0.07-in. thickness under static and dynamic conditions, respectively, and it had zero porosity and permeability after 30 minutes under static and dynamic conditions. SEM results showed that the two layers contained large and small particles, but there was extremely poor sorting in the layer, that was close to the drilling fluid, which led to zero porosity in this layer. Previous models underestimated the thickness of the filter cake by almost 50%. A new method was developed to measure the thickness of the filter cake, and various models were screened to identify the best model that can predict our permeability measurements.
|File Size||7 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Al-Abduwani, F.A.H., Bedrikovetsy, P., Farajzadeh, R., van den Broek, W.,and Currie, P.K. 2005. External Filter Cake Erosion: Mathematical Model andExperimental Study. Paper SPE 94635 presented at the SPE European FormationDamage Conference, Sheveningen, The Netherlands, 25-27 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94635-MS.
Bourgoyne, A.T., Millheim, K.K., Chenevert, M.E., and Young, S.F. 1991.Applied Drilling Engineering, second (revised) printing, Vol. 2.Richardson, Texas: Textbook Series, SPE.
Civan, F. 1994. A Multi-Phase Mud Filtrate Invasion and Wellbore Filter CakeFormation Model. Paper SPE 28709 presented at the International PetroleumConference and Exhibition of Mexico, Veracruz, Mexico, 10-13 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28709-MS.
Civan, F. 1996a. A Multi-Purpose Formation Damage Model. Paper SPE 31101presented at the SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium, Lafayette, Louisiana,USA, 14-15 February.
Civan, F. 1996b. Interactions of the Horizontal Wellbore Hydraulics andFormation Damage. Paper SPE 35213 presented at the Permian Basin Oil and GasRecovery Conference, Midland, Texas, USA, 27-29 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/35213-MS.
Civan, F. 1998. Practical model for compressive cake filtrationincluding fine particle invasion. AIChE J. 44 (11):2388-2398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690441107.
Jiao, D. and Sharma, M.M. 1994. Mechanism of Cake Buildup in CrossflowFiltration of Colloidal Suspensions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 162 (2): 454-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1994.1060.
Khatib, Z.I. 1994. Prediction of Formation Damage Due to Suspended Solids:Modeling Approach of Filter Cake Buildup in Injectors. Paper SPE 28488presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans,25-28 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28488-MS.
Li, W., Kiser, C., and Richard, Q. 2005. Development of A Filter CakePermeability Test Methodology. Paper presented at the American Filtration &Separations Society 2005 International Topical Conferences & Exposition,Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 19-22 September.
Martinez, M.D., Mayne, J.D., Ortega, C., Trujillo, and Maestas, A. 2000. Theadvantages of using a Multiple Leaf Filter System in a Chloride SeparationsProcess. Paper presented at the 25th MAES International Symposium and CareerFair.
Osisanya, S.O. and Griffith, J. 1997. Evaluation of Cement Slurry QualityUsing Filter Cake Permeability And Thickness. Paper PETSOC 97-136 presented atthe Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, 8-11 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97-136.
Rautela, M.S. 2000. A Method for Determination of the Permeability of theFilter Cake at Wellsite. Paper SPE 50692 available from SPE, Richardson,Texas.
Tien, C., Bai, R., and Ramarao, B.V. 1997. Analysis of cake growth in cakefiltration: Effect of fine particle retention. AIChE J. 43(1): 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690430106.
Tiller, F.M. 1990. Tutorial: Interpretation of filtration data, I.Fluid/Part. Sep. J. 3 (1): 85-94.
Tiller, F.M. 2002. Theory and Practice of Solid-Liquid Separation,fourth edition. Houston, Texas: University of Houston.