Acidizing-Induced Damage in Sandstone Injector Wells: Laboratory Testing and a Case History
- Abdullah Al-Mohammad (Saudi Aramco) | Mohammed H. Al-Khaldi (Saudi Aramco) | Saleh Haif Al-Mutairi (Saudi Aramco) | Ali Al-Zahrani (Saudi Aramco)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- September 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 885 - 902
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.8 Formation Damage, 4.3.4 Scale, 3.2.4 Acidising, 3 Production and Well Operations
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 689 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Throughout a well's lifetime, formation damage can occur during the activities of drilling, completion, injection, or well-stimulation treatments. Typically, remedial treatments to restore the well performance involve injection of reactive fluids capable of removing such damage. Therefore, understanding damage mechanism and type is critical for fluid selection and effective treatment design. Without this knowledge, the conducted stimulation treatment could cause a more-severe form of formation damage.
This report discusses the improper use of mud acid [at 9 wt% hydrochloric acid (HCl)/1 wt% hydrofluoric acid (HF)] in restoring the injectivity of Well N-510. The subject well was stimulated with two acid-stimulation treatments in an attempt to improve the poor results of a previous cleanout job, conducted to remove mud filter cake. These treatments were designed to remove the damage that has been limiting the well injectivity. However, it was found that these acidizing treatments created a new formation damage that resulted in the severe decline of well injectivity.
Integration of chemical-analysis techniques performed on return fluids and coreflood experiments was used to assess the effectiveness of all conducted treatments. This report demonstrates the techniques used to identify the source and type of formation-damage mechanism that occurred during each treatment. On the basis of these studies, it was found that the poor results of the cleanout job were caused by precipitation of calcium sulfate. This precipitation was a result of the mixing between spent cleanout acid, having a high amount of calcium, and the high-sulfate-content water. Most of this precipitation occurred in the wellbore vicinity during the preceding stages of the well flowback.
Calcium sulfate precipitation had a negative impact on the performance of the conducted acid-stimulation treatments. In the presence of this precipitation, the two successive mud-acid-stimulation treatments created another form of damage (i.e., in-situ fluoride-based scale). Initially, the fresh injected mud acid dissolved most of the calcium sulfate scale, and as a result, it contained a high amount of dissolved calcium ions. However, upon the spending of injected mud acid in the formation, calcium fluoride precipitated as a result of the increase of solution pH value.
The interactions between different acid systems and the constituents of the downhole environment, resulting in the precipitation of calcium sulfate and calcium fluoride, are discussed. In addition, this report provides recommended modifications for future stimulation treatments, conducted under similar conditions, so as to prevent the formation of these scales.
|File Size||6 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Ali, S.A., Ermel, E., Clarke, J., Fuller, M.J., Xiao, Z., and Malone,B. 2008. Stimulation of High-Temperature Sandstone Formations From West AfricaWith Chelating Agent-Based Fluids. SPE Prod & Oper 23(1): 32-38. SPE-93805-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93805-PA.
Aliaga, D.A., Wu, G., Sharma, M.M., and Lake, L.W. 1992. Barium andCalcium Sulfate Precipitation and Migration Inside Sandpacks. SPE FormEval 7 (1): 79-86. SPE-19765-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/19765-PA.
Carlberg, B.L. 1973. Solubility of Calcium Sulfate in Brine. Paper SPE 4353presented at the SPE Oilfield Chemistry Symposium, Denver, 24-25 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4353-MS.
Crowe, C.W. 1985. Evaluation of Agents for Preventing Precipitation ofFerric Hydroxide From Spent Treating Acid. J Pet Technol 37(4): 691-695. SPE-12497-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12497-PA.
Crowe, C.W. 1986. Prevention of Undesirable Precipitates from Acid TreatingFluids. Paper SPE 14090 presented at the International Meeting on PetroleumEngineering, Beijing, 17-20 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14090-MS.
Delorey, J.R., Allen, S., and McMaster, L. 1996. Precipitation ofCalcium Sulphate During Carbonate Acidizing: Minimizing the Risk. Paper 96-84presented at the Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, 10-12 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/96-84.
Gdanski, R.D. and Peavy, M.A. 1986. Well Return Analysis CausesRe-Evaluation of HCl Theories. Paper SPE 14825 presented at the SPE FormationDamage Control Symposium, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 26-27 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14825-MS.
He, J., Mohamed, I.M., and Nasr-El-Din, H.A. 2011. Mixing HydrochloricAcid and Seawater for Matrix Acidizing: Is It a Good Practice? Paper SPE 143855presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, Noordwijk, TheNetherlands, 7-10 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143855-MS.
Li, Z. and Demopoulos, G.P. 2005. Solubility of CaSO4 Phases in Aqueous HCl+ CaCl2 Solutions from 283 K to 353 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 50 (6): 1971-1982.
Moghadasi, J., Jamialahmadi, M., Müller-Steinhagen, H., et al. 2003. ScaleFormation in Iranian Oil Reservoir and Production Equipment During WaterInjection. Paper SPE 80406 presented at the International Symposium on OilfieldScale, Aberdeen, 29-30 January. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/80406-MS.
Nasr-El-Din, H.A. and Zabihi, M. 2006. Restoring Injectivity of WellsDrilled in Sour Carbonate Formations. Paper SPE 102860 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102860-MS.
Pan, H.B. and Darvell, B.W. 2007. Solubility of calcium fluoride andfluorapatite by solid titration. Arch. Oral Biol. 52 (9):861-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.03.002.
Raju, K.U., Nasr-El-Din, H.A., Hilab, V., Siddiqui, S., and Mehta, S.2005. Injection of Aquifer Water and GOSP Disposal Water into Tight CarbonateReservoirs. SPE J. 10 (4): 374-384. SPE-87440-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87440-PA.
Raju, K.U.G. and Nasr-El-Din, H.A. 2004. Calcium Sulfate Scale: Field Testsand Model Predictions. Paper NACE 04397 presented at the NACE InternationalCORROSION 2004 59th Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, 28 March - 1April.
Ramsdell, L.S. and Partridge, E.P. 1929. The crystal forms of calciumsulphate. Am. Mineral. 14: 59-74.
Shuchart, C.E. and Gdanski, R.D. 1996. Improved Success in Acid Stimulationswith a New Organic-HF System. Paper SPE 36907 presented at the EuropeanPetroleum Conference, Milan, Italy, 22-24 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36907-MS.
Silcock, H.L. 1979. Solubilities of Inorganic and Organic Compounds,Vol. 3, 754-755. New York: Elsevier.
Smith, C.F., Nolan III, T.J., and Crenshaw, P.L. 1968. Removal andInhibition of Calcium Sulfate Scale in Waterflood Projects. J PetTechnol 20 (11): 1249-1256. SPE-1957-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1957-PA.
Vetter, O.J.G. and Phillips, R.C. 1970. Prediction of Deposition of CalciumSulfate Scale Under Down-Hole Conditions. J Pet Technol 22 (10):1299-1308. SPE-2620-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2620-PA.