A Proposed Method for Planning the Best Initial Response to Kicks Taken During Managed-Pressure-Drilling Operations
- John R. Smith (Louisiana State University) | Bhavin M. Patel (Weatherford International)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- June 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 194 - 203
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.7.5 Well Control, 1.7.2 Managed Pressure Drilling
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 911 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
An industry-supported research project has investigated well-control methods for managed-pressure drilling (MPD) using the constant-bottomhole-pressure (CBHP) method. This paper proposes a method for planning the best initial response to be used when a kick occurs during CBHP MPD on the basis of conclusions from the research. That research (Davoudi et al. 2010) concluded that the three most widely applicable initial responses to kicks during MPD were increasing casing pressure until flow out equals flow in, shutting the well in, and using an adaptation of an MPD-pump shutdown schedule to detect and shut in a low-rate kick. Increasing pump rate until flow out equals flow in was concluded to have limited, but potentially still important, applications.
The proposed method uses a decision tree during the planning phase of a well to select the best kick response to be used for each hole interval for inclusion in the drilling program. This selection is based on the desired tolerance to kicks, equipment being used, well geometry, and conclusiveness of the kick warning signs. The equations necessary to calculate decision parameters, example calculations for an application of the decision tree, and comparison of simulation results to application of the decision tree are included. The decision tree indicates the response that maximizes kick tolerance within the well design, gives a basis for revising equipment or well design to maximize kick tolerance, and supports calculation of the expected kick-tolerance advantage of the increasing-casing-pressure response vs. a shut-in response.
|File Size||945 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Chirinos, J.E., Smith, J.R., and Bourgoyne, D.A. 2011a. AlternativeShut-In and Pump Start-Up Procedures for Kicks Taken During MPD Operations.Paper SPE 143094 presented at the IADC/SPE Managed Pressure Drilling andUnderbalanced Operations Conference & Exhibition, Denver, 5-6 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143094-MS.
Chirinos, J.E., Smith, J.R., and Bourgoyne, D.A. 2011b. A SimplifiedMethod to Estimate Peak Casing Pressure During MPD Well Control. Paper SPE147496 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver,30 October-2 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/147496-MS.
Das, A.K., Smith, J.R., and Frink, P.J. 2008. Simulations ComparingDifferent Initial Responses to Kicks Taken During Managed Pressure Drilling.Paper SPE 112761 presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Orlando,Florida, USA, 4-6 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/112761-MS.
Davoudi, M., Smith, J.R., Patel, B., and Chirinos, J.E. 2010.Evaluation of Alternative Initial Responses to Kicks Taken during ManagedPressure Drilling. Paper SPE 128424 presented at the IADC/SPE DrillingConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 2-4 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/128424-MS.
Grayson, M.B. 2009. Increased Operational Safety and Efficiency WithManaged-Pressure Drilling. Paper SPE 120982 presented at the SPE AmericasE&P Environmental and Safety Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 23-25March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/120982-MS.
Guner, H. 2009. Simulation Study of Emerging Well Control Methods forInfluxes Caused by Bottomhole Pressure Fluctuations during Managed PressureDrilling. MS thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana(May 2009).
Hannegan, D.M. and Fisher, K. 2005. Managed Pressure Drilling in MarineEnvironments. Paper IPTC 10173 presented at the International PetroleumTechnology Conference, Doha, Qatar, 21-23 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/10173-MS.
MMS. 2008. Notice to Lessees and Operators of Federal Oil, Gas, and SulphurLeases in the Outer Continental Shelf, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region: ManagedPressure Drilling Projects. Report, NTL 2008-G07, Minerals Management ServiceGOMR, New Orleans, Louisiana (15 June 2008), http://www.iadc.org/committees/ubo_mpd/Documents/MMS%20NTL%202008-G07.pdf(accessed October 2010).
Santos, H., Catak, E., Kinder, J., Franco, E., Lage, A., and Sonnemann, P. 2007. First Field Applications of Microflux Control Show VeryPositive Surprises. Paper SPE 108333 presented at the IADC/SPE Managed PressureDrilling & Underbalanced Operations, Galveston, Texas, USA, 28-29 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/108333-MS.
Santos, H., Reid, P., Jones, J., and McCaskill, J. 2005. Developingthe Micro-Flux Control Method--Part 1: System Development, Field TestPreparation, and Results. Paper SPE 97025 presented at the SPE/IADC Middle EastDrilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, 12-14 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97025-MS.
van Riet, E.J., Reitsma, D., and Vandercraen, B. 2003.Development and Testing of a Fully Automated System to Accurately ControlDownhole Pressure during Drilling Operations. Paper SPE 85310 presented at theSPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi,UAE, 20-22 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/85310-MS.
Watson, D., Brittenham, T., and Moore, P.L. 2003. Advanced WellControl, Vol. 10. Richardson, Texas: Textbook Series, SPE.