Enhancing Production by Removing Zinc Sulfide Scale From an Offshore Well: A Case History
- Sandra L. Berry (Baker Hughes) | Joel L. Boles (Baker Hughes) | Amit K. Singh (Baker Hughes) | Imran Hashim (Newfield Exploration)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 318 - 326
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3.4.1 Inhibition and Remediation of Hydrates, Scale, Paraffin / Wax and Asphaltene, 4.3.4 Scale, 4.2.3 Materials and Corrosion, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.8 Formation Damage
- Scale, Treatment Formulation, Production Enhancement, Acidizing
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 527 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Deposition of mineral scales is the root cause of many production problems in oil and gas operations. These scale deposits have resulted in formation damage, production losses, significant rate and pressure reductions, and equipment failure because of corrosion issues. The most commonly encountered mineral scales in the oil field are carbonates and sulfate-based calcium sulfate, barium sulfate, and strontium sulfate scales. However, a more unusual form of these mineral scales, zinc sulfide, has recently been reported.
This paper focuses on the systematic study of a zinc sulfide scale and the operation that removed it from a well in the Gulf of Mexico. Identifying the scale form and composition and the factors affecting its dissolution resulted in a treatment that successfully removed the scale, thereby enhancing gas production from the well.
This scale was identified as wurtzite, a form of zinc sulfide scale. Extensive laboratory testing considered acid solubility and other scale-removal issues at downhole temperature and pressure conditions, as compared with the theoretical solubility of zinc sulfide in hydrochloric acid (HCl). The study also determined that other factors may affect the real-world dissolution efficiency of the acid: pressure changes, hydrogen sulfide scavenger concentration and type, the ratio of acid volume to scale weight, pre-treatment oxidizer use, and pH values that prevent reprecipitation of dissolved scale.
This paper will describe the prejob testing process and a field case history of a coiled-tubing acid scale treatment that effectively removed the zinc sulfide scale from tubulars and the formation. Data will be presented showing the composition of the acid-flowback samples as well as the treatment and production charts.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Anthony, J.W., Bideaux, R.A., Bladh, K.W., and Nichols, M.C., Eds. Handbookof Mineralogy. Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, VA 20151-1110, USA.http://www.handbookofmineralogy.org/.
Buschow, K.H.J., Cahn, R.W., Flemings, M.C., Ilschner, B., Kramer, E.J.,Mahajan, S., and Veyssière, P. 2001. Encyclopedia of Materials: Science andTechnology. New York: Pergamon Press.
Collins, I.R. and Jordan, M.M. 2003. Occurrence, Prediction, andPrevention of Zinc Sulfide Scale Within Gulf Coast and North SeaHigh-Temperature and High-Salinity Fields. SPE Prod & Oper 18 (3): 200-209. SPE-84963-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84963-PA.
Darby, J.G., Uhlig, D.A., Steckler, J.R., and Martin, J. 2009. ScalePrevention Application of a Chemical Technology That Has Been Effectively andEconomically Applied to a 420°F, 13,500-ft-Deep, Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Well toPrevent Lead and Zinc Sulfide Deposition. Paper SPE 124155 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124155-MS.
Wells, A.F. 1984. Structural Inorganic Chemistry, fifth edition. NewYork: Oxford University Press.