A Method for Estimating Hydrocarbon Cumulative Production Distribution of Individual Wells in Naturally Fractured Carbonates, Sandstones, Shale Gas, Coalbed Methane and Tight Gas Formations
- Roberto Aguilera (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- August 2010
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 53 - 58
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.8.3 Coal Seam Gas, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 5.8.6 Naturally Fractured Reservoir, 5.8.1 Tight Gas
- cumulative production distribution, naturally fractured reservoirs
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 1,403 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
A method, based on factual observations of naturally fractured reservoirs in several countries, is presented for estimating distribution of hydrocarbon cumulative production in wells drilled in fractured reservoirs of Types A, B or C. These observations indicate that in reservoirs of Type C, most of the cumulative production is provided by just a few wells, while the majority of the wells contribute a small part of the reservoir cumulative production. In reservoirs of Type B, the number of wells contributing significantly to cumulative production becomes larger relative to the case of Type C reservoirs. Finally, in reservoirs of Type A, a large number of wells contribute to field production, as compared with Type B reservoirs.
The method is shown to be useful for tackling problems of practical importance in naturally fractured reservoirs, including performing or not performing infill drilling, estimating the variation in cumulative hydrocarbon production per well in a given reservoir and estimating the number of wells that might be required for a given field hydrocarbon recovery. The method is illustrated using data from various fractured reservoirs, including the Barnett shale and sandstone reservoirs in the United States, carbonate reservoirs in Mexico and Venezuela and coalbed methane reservoirs and tight gas sands in Canada.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||6|
1. Haseman, W.P. 1930. A Theory of Well Spacing. SPE-930146-G.Trans., AIME, 86.
2. Nelson, R.A. 2001. Geologic Analysis of Naturally FracturedReservoirs, second edition. Woburn, Massachusetts: Gulf PublishingCompany.
3. McNaughton, D.A. and Garb, F.A. 1975. Finding and Evaluating PetroleumAccumulations in Fractured Reservoir Rock. Exploration and Economics of thePetroleum Industry 13: 23-49.
4. Aguilera, R.F. 2006. Assessing the Long Run Availability of Global FossilEnergy Resources. PhD Dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden,Colorado.
5. Aguilera, R.F. 2008. The Availability of Global Fossil Energy: HowLong Will it Last? Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
6. Boone, D. 2006. Evaluation of the Barnett Shale: The Process and ResultsUsing PowerTools and Production data. IHS presentation given at the User Forum(Technical Track), Houston, 18 May.
7. Aguilera, R.F., Harding, T., Krause, F., and Aguilera, R. 2008. NaturalGas Production from Tight Gas Formations: A Global Perspective. Paper presentedat the 19th World Petroleum Congress, Madrid, Spain, 29 June-3 July.
8. Stotts, G.W.J., Anderson, D.M., and Mattar, L. 2007. Evaluating and Developing Tight GasReserves-Best Practices. Paper SPE 108183 presented at the SPE Symposium onRocky Mountain Oil and Gas Technology, Denver, 16-18 April. doi:10.2118/108183-MS.
9. Solano, N., Zambrano, L., and Aguilera, R. 2010. Cumulative GasProduction Distribution on the Nikanassin Tight Gas Formation, Alberta andBritish Columbia, Canada. Paper SPE 132923 prepared for presentation the SPETrinidad and Tobago Energy Resources Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad, 27-30June.
10. Aguilera, R. 2010. Flow Units: From Conventional to Tight Gas to ShaleGas Reservoirs. Paper SPE 132845 prepared for presentation the SPE Trinidad andTobago Energy Resources Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad, 27-30 June.