Increasing CO2-Storage Efficiency Through a CO2/Brine-Displacement Approach
- Oyewande Akinnikawe (Texas A&M University) | Anish Chaudhary (Texas A&M University) | Oscar Vasquez (Texas A&M University) | Chijioke Enih (Texas A&M University) | Christine A. Ehlig-Economides (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 743 - 751
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.10 Storage Reservoir Engineering
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 476 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Previous studies have shown that bulk carbon dioxide (CO2) injection in deep saline aquifers supplies insufficient aquifer storage efficiency and causes excessive risk because of aquifer pressurization. To avoid pressurization, we propose to produce the same volume of brine as is injected as CO2 in a CO2/brine displacement. Two approaches to CO2/brine displacement are considered--an external brine-disposal strategy in which brine is disposed of into another formation such as oilfield brine and an internal saturated brine-injection strategy with which the produced brine is desalinated and reinjected into the same formation. The displacement strategies increase the storage efficiency from 0.48% for the bulk-injection case to more than 7%. A conceptual case study with documented aquifer properties of the Woodbine aquifer in Texas indicates that the available volume is sufficient to store all the CO2 being generated by power plants in the vicinity for approximately 20 years only. However, the CO2/brine displacement increases storage efficiency enough to store the CO2 produced for at least 240 years at the current rate of coal-fired electric-power generation. Sensitivity analyses on relative permeability, permeability, and temperature were conducted to see the effects of these reservoir parameters on storage efficiency.
For bulk injection, increased permeability resulted in increased storage efficiency, but for the CO2/brine-displacement strategies, decreased permeability increased storage efficiency because this resulted in higher average pressure that increased CO2 storage per unit of pore volume (PV) and increased CO2 viscosity. Also, storage efficiencies for the displacement strategies were highly sensitive to relative permeability. There is an optimal CO2-injection temperature below which the formation-fracturing pressure is lowered and above which CO2 breakthrough occurs for a smaller injection mass. The CO2/brine-displacement approach increased capital expenditures for additional wells and an operating expense for produced-brine disposal, but these additional costs are offset by increased CO2-storage efficiency at least 12 times that achieved by the bulk-injection strategy.
|File Size||961 KB||Number of Pages||9|
Akinnikawe, O. and Ehlig-Economides, C.E. 2012. Geologic Model and FluidFlow Simulation of Woodbine Aquifer CO2 Sequestration, unsolicitedpaper submitted for SPE review.
Bene, J., Griffin, S.W, and Nicot, J.-P. 2007. Assessment of Groundwater Usein the Northern Trinity Aquifer Due to Urban Growth and Barnett ShaleDevelopment. Contract Number: 0604830613. Austin, Texas: Texas WaterDevelopment Board.
Bennion, B. and Bachu, S. 2005. Relative Permeability Characteristics forSupercritical CO2 Displacing Water in a Variety of PotentialSequestration Zones. Paper SPE 95547 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 9-12 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/95547-MS.
Bennion, B. and Bachu, S. 2008. Drainage and Imbibition RelativePermeability Relationships for Supercritical CO2/Brine and H2S/BrineSystems in Intergranular Sandstone, Carbonate, Shale, and Anhydrite Rocks.SPE Res Eval & Eng 11 (3): 487-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99326-PA.
Bureau of Economic Geology. 2010. Woodbine Formation, East Texas Basin. http://www.beg.utexas.edu/environqlty/co2seq/co2data/6woodbine.htm.
Burton, M., Kumar, N., and Bryant, S.L. 2008. Time-Dependent InjectivityDuring CO2 Storage in Aquifers. Paper SPE 113937 presented at theSPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 20-23 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/113937-MS.
FutureGen Alliance. 2006. Heart of Brazos Site Environmental InformationVolume. Washington, DC: United States Department of Energy.
FutureGen Alliance. 2007. FutureGen Initial Conceptual Design Report.Washington, DC: United States Department of Energy.
Kumar, N. 2008. CO2 Sequestration: Understanding the PlumeDynamics and Estimating Risk. MS thesis, Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering,University of Texas, Austin, Texas (<month> 2008).
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). 2007. Notice of PriorityGroundwater Management Area Report Completion and Availability. T.C.o.E.Quality.
Texas Water Development Board. 2007. State Water Plan. Austin, Texas: TexasWater Development Board.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2008. Existing ElectricGenerating Units in the United States (by Energy Source), http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/capacity/capacity.html.
Willhite, G.P. 1986. Waterflooding. Richardson, Texas: Society ofPetroleum Engineers.