Net CO2 Stored in North American EOR Projects
- John E. Faltinson (Alberta Innovates Technology Futures) | Bill Gunter (G. Bach Enterprises Incorporated)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- April 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 55 - 60
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 6.11.1 CO2 Sequestration
- CO2 emissions, Enhanced-oil recovery (EOR), CO2 storage, CO2 utilization
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 773 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
One promising method for reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions when storing CO2 in oil reservoirs is CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR). In order to make a significant contribution to mitigating climate change from emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), CO2 EOR must actually reduce CO2 emissions by storing net positive volumes of CO2. This requires that CO2-EOR schemes store more CO2 in the subsurface than the execution of the project emits (net positive storage of CO2). Fugitive emissions associated with CO2 EOR primarily include the burning of fossil fuels (fuel gas) to power CO2-injection compressors and the on-site consumption of electric power, which results in CO2 emissions off site, where the power was generated. Evaluating the effectiveness of CO2 EOR in reducing CO2 emissions must be conducted in an unbiased way in which only relevant fugitive emissions that are directly connected with the CO2-EOR project are deducted. It has been suggested that fugitive emissions from downstream oil refining and consumption of the transportation products should be deducted from the net CO2 stored by CO2-EOR projects. This presumes that these emissions (refining and consumption) are incremental to world aggregate oil-consumption emissions and would not occur if the EOR project was not executed. World oil production is determined by world oil demand and if CO2-EOR projects were not undertaken, some other source of oil would step forward and fill the gap. Therefore, executing CO2-EOR projects will not result in incremental aggregate refining and consumption emissions. When downstream-refining and product-consumption fugitive emissions are excluded from the calculation of project-life-cycle CO2-EOR storage, it is clear that CO2 EOR does result in net positive CO2 storage.
|File Size||478 KB||Number of Pages||6|
GPSA. 2004a. Compressors and Expanders. In GPSA Engineering Data Book(FPS), twelfth edition, Vol. 1, Sec. 13, 4-11. Tulsa, Oklahoma: GasProcessors Suppliers Association.
GPSA. 2004b. Prime Movers for Mechanical Drives. In GPSA Engineering DataBook (FPS), twelfth edition, Vol. 1, Sec. 15, 22. Tulsa, Oklahoma: GasProcessors Suppliers Association.
Khoo, H.H. and Tan, R.B.H. 2006. Life Cycle Investigation of CO2 Recoveryand Sequestration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (12):4016-4024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es051882a.
McCann, T. and Magee, P. 1999. Crude Oil Greenhouse Gas Life Cycle AnalysisHelps Assign Values for CO2 Emissions Trading. Oil & Gas Journal 97 (8): 38-44.
Pyo, K., Damien-Diaz, N., Powell, M., and Van Niewkerk, J. 2003. CO2Flooding in Joffre Viking Pool. Paper 2003-109 presented at the PetroleumSociety's 4th Canadian International Petroleum Conference (CIPC 2003), Calgary,10-12 June.
Stalkup, F.I., Lake, L.W., Stein, M.H., Saidikowski, R.M., and Folger, L.K.1999. CO2 Flooding, No. 51, 7-87. Richardson, Texas: SPE Reprint Series,SPE.