Study of Alkaline/Polymer Flooding for Heavy-Oil Recovery Using Channeled Sandpacks
- Yongge Wu (University of Regina) | Mingzhe Dong (University of Calgary) | Ezeddin Shirif (University of Regina)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- June 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 310 - 319
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 5.3.4 Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow
- Flood test, Heavy oil, Chemical flooding, Alkaline/polymer flooding, Enhanced oil recovery
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,401 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
For heavy oils with viscosities ranging from 1000 to 10 000 mPa.s in western Canada, primary production and waterflood together can recover only 8-15% of original oil in place (OOIP) at their economic limits because of the adverse mobility ratio, severe water channeling, low reservoir pressure, and formation voidage. These heavy oils usually have a relatively high content of acids that can react with alkalis to form in-situ surfactants. The loosely consolidated sandstone formations in which these oils are deposited are characterized by high porosity, high permeability, and low reservoir temperature. These reservoir conditions are favorable for polymer application. Therefore, there is a potential to improve waterflood in these reservoirs by applying alkaline/polymer (A/P) flooding.
This paper presents the results of a laboratory study of A/P flooding for heavy-oil recovery, including viscosity measurements, flood tests conducted in channeled sandpacks, residual-resistance-factor (FRR) determination, and residual-oil-distribution tests. A heavy oil with a viscosity of 1,202 cp and an acid number of 1.07 (mg of KOH/g of oil) and produced brine collected from a heavy-oil reservoir in Alberta are used in this study. We found that the distribution of the injected chemical solution within the high-permeability channels leads to the diversion of the subsequently injected chemical solution to low-permeability zones with higher oil saturation because of the formation of blockage in the channel zones. Consequently, pressure buildup during chemical-slug injection is the key to the improvement of displacement efficiency. Flood tests also show that A/P flooding is more efficient than either alkaline flooding or polymer flooding. The optimal formulation for the heavy oil used in this study is 0.4% NaOH + 0.2% Na2CO3 + 1000 mg/L polymer, with a tertiary oil recovery of 25-30% of OOIP above that from waterflooding. Analysis of the results of the residual-oil distributions in the channeled sandpacks at the end of A/P flooding show that A/P flooding can effectively improve the sweep efficiency of waterflooding for the heavy oil.
|File Size||887 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Adams, D.M. 1982. Experiences With Waterflooding Lloydminster Heavy-OilReservoirs. J Pet Technol 34 (8): 1643-1650. SPE-10196-PA.doi: 10.2118/10196-PA.
Alam, M.W. and Tiab, D.U. 1987. Mobility Control of Caustic Flood. Paper SPE16179 available from SPE, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Albartamani, N.S., Farouq Ali, S.M., and Lepski, B. 1999. Investigation ofFoamy Oil Phenomena in Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper SPE 54084 presented at theInternational Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Bakersfield,California, USA, 17-19 March. doi:10.2118/54084-MS.
Alberta's Energy Reserves 2006 and Supply/Demand Outlook 2007-2016. 2007.Calgary: Alberta Energy and Utilities Board.
Alvarado, D.A. and Marsden, S.S. Jr. 1979. Flow Of Oil-in-Water EmulsionsThrough Tubes and Porous Media. SPE J. 19 (6): 369-377.SPE-5859-PA. doi:10.2118/5859-PA.
API RP 40, Recommended Practices for Core Analysis, second edition.1998. Washington, DC: API.
Castor, T.P., Somerton, W.H., Kelly, J.F. 1981. Recovery mechanisms ofalkaline flooding. In Surface Phenomena in Enhanced Oil Recovery, ed.D.O. Shah, 249-291. New York City: Plenum Publishing.
Chiwetelu, C.I., Neale, G.H., Hornof, V., and George, A.E. 1991. AlkalineWaterflooding of Saskatchewan Heavy Oil Reservoirs--Part 1: Screening ofCaustic Reagents. Paper No. 19 presented at the Petroleum Conference of theSouth Saskatchewan Section, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, 7-9 October.
Dong, M., Liu, Q., Zhou, W., Ma, S., and Wang, J. 2004. Displacement ofHeavy Oil through Interfacial Instability--A Study of an EOR Method for MurphyEast Bodo Heavy Oil Reservoir. Technical report, Petroleum Technology ResearchCentre (PTRC), Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Dusseault, M.B. 2001. Comparing Venezuelan and Canadian Heavy Oil and TarSands. Paper CIPC 2001-061 presented at the Canadian International PetroleumConference, Calgary, 12-14 June. doi: 10.2118/2001-061.
Forth, R., Slevinsky, B., Lee, D., and Fedemczil, L. 1997. Application ofStatistical Analysis to Optimize Reservoir Performance. J Can PetTechnol 36 (9): 36-42.
French, T.R. and Burchfield, T.E. 1990. Design and optimization of alkalineflooding formulations. Paper SPE 20238 presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced OilRecovery Symposium, Tulsa, 22-25 April. doi: 10.2118/20238-MS.
Gogarty, W.B. 1967. Rheological Properties of Pseudoplastic Fluids in PorousMedia. SPE J. 7 (2): 149-160. SPE-15566-A. doi: 10.2118/1566-A.
Jennings, H.Y. Jr., Johnson, C.E. Jr., and McAuliffe, C.D. 1974. A CausticWaterflooding Process for Heavy Oils. J Pet Technol 26(12): 1344-1352. SPE-4741-PA. doi:10.2118/4741-PA.
Knight, B.L. and Rhudy, J.S. 1977. Recovery Of High-Viscosity Crudes ByPolymer Flooding. J Can Pet Technol 16 (4): 46-56. JCPTPaper No. 77-04-07. doi:10.2118/77-04-07.
Kumar, M., Hoang, V., Satik, C., and Rojas, D.H. 2008. High-Mobility-RatioWater Flood Performance Prediction: Challenges and New Insights. SPE ResEval & Eng 11 (1): 186-196. SPE-97671-PA. doi: 10.2118/97671-PA.
Larrondo, L.E., Urness, C.M., and Milosz, G.M. 1985. Laboratory Evaluationof Sodium Hydroxide, Sodium Orthosilicate, and Sodium Metasilicate as AlkalineFlooding Agents for a Western Canada Reservoir. Paper SPE 13577 presented atthe SPE Oilfield and Geothermal Chemistry Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, USA,9-11 April. doi:10.2118/13577-MS.
Liu, Q., Dong, M., and Ma, S. 2006. Alkaline/Surfactant Flood Potential inWestern Canadian Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper SPE 99791 presented at the SPE/DOESymposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 22-26 April. doi: 10.2118/99791-MS.
Ma, S., Dong, M., Li, Z., and Shirif, E. 2007. Evaluation of theeffectiveness of chemical flooding using heterogeneous sandpack flood test.J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 55 (3-4): 294-300. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2006.05.002.
Mai, A. and Kantzas, A. 2008. Improved Heavy Oil Recovery by Low RateWaterflooding. Paper SPE 117648 presented at the SPE/PS/CHOA InternationalThermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 20-23 October. doi: 10.2118/117648-MS.
Radke, C.J. 1982. Additives for Alkaline Recovery of Heavy Oil. Proc.,Annual DOE Conference on Heavy Oils, San Francisco, 27-29 July, 2-19.
Saskatchewan Energy and Mines. 2008. Crude Oil in Saskatchewan. Fact Sheet,Ministry of Energy and Resources, Saskatchewan, Canada (8 September 2008).
Seright, R.S. 1995. Improved techniques for fluid diversion in oil recoveryprocess. Second Annual Report No. DOE/BC/14880-10, Contact No.DE-AC22-92BC14880, US DOE, Washington, DC (March 1995).
Smith, G.E. 1992. Waterflooding Heavy Oils. Paper SPE 24367 presented at theSPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming, USA, 18-21 May. doi: 10.2118/24367-MS.
Subkow, P. 1942. Process for the Removal of Bitumen From BituminousDeposits. US Patent No. 2,288,857.
Symonds, R.W.P., Farouq Ali, S.M., and Thomas, S. 1991. A Laboratory StudyOf Caustic Flooding For Two Alberta Crude Oils. J Can Pet Technol 30 (1): 44-49. JCPT Paper No. 91-01-02. doi: 10.2118/91-01-02.
Wang, J. and Dong, M. 2007. A Laboratory Study of Polymer Flooding forImproving Heavy Oil Recovery. Paper CIPC 2000-178 presented at the CanadianInternational Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 12-14 June. doi: 10.2118/2007-178.
Wassmuth, F.R., Arnold, W., Green, K., and Cameron, N. 2007a. Polymer FloodApplication to Improve Heavy Oil Recovery at East Bodo. Paper CIPC 2007-184presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 12-14June. doi:10.2118/2007-184.
Wassmuth, F.R., Green, K., Hodgins, L., Turta, A.T. 2007b. Polymer FloodTechnology For Heavy Oil Recovery. Paper 2007-182 presented at the CanadianInternational Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 12-14 June. doi: 10.2118/2007-182.
Wu, Y. 2010. Experimental study of polymer enhanced alkaline flooding forWestern Canadian heavy oil recovery. MASc thesis, University of Regina, Regina,Saskatchewan.
Xie, J., Chung, B., Leung, L. 2008. Design and implementation of a causticflooding EOR pilot at Court Bakekken heavy oil reservoir. Paper SPE 117221presented at the SPE/PS/CHOA International Thermal Operations and Heavy OilSymposium, Calgary, 20-23 October. doi: 10.2118/117221-MS.
Zaitoun, A., Tabary, R., Fossey, J.P., and Boyle, T. 1998. Implementing aheavy oil recovery horizontal polymer flood in Western Canada. Proc.,7th Unitar International Conference on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands, Beijing,27-30 October, Paper No. 1998-191, 1787-1794.
Zhang, P. and Huang, S. 2008. Waterflood Additives for Improved Heavy OilRecovery. Final Report, PTRC No. 011-00144-SRC, SRC Publication No. 12274-1C08,Petroleum Technology Research Centre, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.